Preview

Abolish Marriage

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
595 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Abolish Marriage
The article “Abolish Marriage” by Michael Kinsley is about why we should get rid of the institution of marriage. Kinsley proposes that marriage should be taken out of federal government and be put into the hands of private organizations. Kinsley argues that if marriage was privatized, the gay marriage debate as well as a lot of the controversy on marriage would be eliminated. Although Kinsley makes an interesting argument, it is bad idea and only simply will not work with today’s society. Kinsley’s solution to the gay marriage debate is to end the institution of government-sanctioned marriage. His idea for marriage is to simply privatize it and let organizations such as churches, department stores, casinos and other such place to have it. He wants to let couples celebrate marriage however and wherever they want and under any rules the couple prefers. Kinsley even suggests if a person wants to marry themselves or even three or more people want to marry, let them do it. Firstly, if marriage were abolished, would it eliminate the various state and federal benefits couples enjoy? Most of us today are concerned about money and how we can save and make the most of it. Federal and state benefits provide benefits to married couples such as tax credits, spousal veterans’ benefits, joint insurance plans, martial confidence privileges, and much more. If marriage were privatized, would most of these benefits go away because they are federally established benefits for married couples? This point alone would sway most married couples away from privatizing marriages because of the fear of it hurting their bank account. What about the confidence privilege? If federal marriage was ended, a spouse could be asked to testify against their spouse in court. Basic laws are in place for married couples to forbid this. This would be a huge disadvantage because married couples know should know each other better than anyone else. Secondly ending federal marriage would lead to it being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A lot of time is spent attempting to decide the legal definition of a domestic partnership. What is the definition of a loving, committed relationship and what is achieved by preventing non-traditional relationships from receiving legal rights? In the article “Here Comes the Groom: A Conservative Case for Gay Marriage,” Andrew Sullivan attempts to answer this question and makes a reasonable argument for promoting the legalization of gay marriage. This article was originally published in The New Republic in August 1989. The New Republic is a magazine that was founded in 1914 and covers current political topics. It is headquartered in Washington, DC. Andrew Sullivan has a doctorate from Harvard in political science. He was formerly the editor of The New Republic magazine and is a respected…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pa250 Unit 1

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One of the basic rights we hold sacred in this country is the freedom to marry whomever we choose. While that seems like a given in the US, because we don’t have the strict class hierarchy of Europe, or the arranged unions found in certain Eastern and African cultures that define who marries whom. We have had, and still do for that matter, rigid restrictions on marriage, when they seem counter-intuitive to social mores. When social feelings begin to shift towards a more progressive outlook, challenges to the status quo are bound to occur, especially when the emotionally charged aspect of marriage is involved. Two perfect examples are the cases of Loving v. Virginia 388 US 1, 87 S Ct1817(1967), and Goodridge v. Department of Public Health 440 Mass 309, 798 NE 2d 941(Mass.2003).…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William J. Bennett, a great spokesman for American conservatives, has powerfully argued as the title indicates in his article "Against Gay Marriage." One does not have to agree with Bennett to appreciate the strength and goodness of his mind. Still, although he raises serious objections to same-sex marriage, his argument overall reads more like an outline, lacking specifics and expert opinions, referring to only one organized, careful study, and committing a number of logical fallacies which muddy and weaken his argument.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In his essay "Against Gay Marriage," William Bennett, a great spokesman for conservatives and former Secretary of education under President Reagan, maintains his conservative stance that allowing same-sex couples to marry would have a harmful and lasting effect on our society 's intrinsic values and, in his view, would stretch the "fragile" institution of marriage beyond recognition (409). Bennett, as the title indicates, presents a powerful argument "Against Gay Marriage." He argues that allowing gay marriage would change the meaning of marriage, the ideal of marriage as being an "honorable estate," and would have a large role in molding sexuality (409).…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gay Marriages: Make Them Legal is an article written by Thomas B. Stoddard, an executive director of a gay rights organization called the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund. In the aforementioned article, he painfully illustrates the injustices and imbalance of the typical “traditional marriage” and its impact on average, devoted homosexual couples. More than just state his opinion on marriage between homosexuals, he emphasizes the injustice by accentuating real world situations. Not only does Stoddard denote the negative effects on loving gay couples, he illuminates the idea of gay marriage as something beneficial not only to gay partners, but society as a whole (722).…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of same sex marriage is one that causes great debate in today’s society. There are many views on weather it should or should not be allowed and the effects it could have on the United States if it were allowed. The debate has been an ongoing one and as more states begin contemplating legalization the debates have become more heated. In an article written by Katha Pollitt, entitled What’s Wrong with Gay Marriage? , she argues for the legalization of same sex marriage making a multitude of valuable points. In an opposing article entitled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide by Charles Colson her argues in opposition against same sex marriage using statistics and history to make his valid points. Both writers argue their points exceptionally but Pollitt’s essay is the better one as it is incredibly fair and reasonable and argues the opposition’s points perfectly.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the world has developed-and is still developing- controversial topics like gay marriage are still prominent is today’s society. William J. Bennett, an influential figure in America, strongly voiced out his standpoint on the topic of same-sex marriage through his article “Against Gay Marriage.” His concerns persistently argue that the rights for gay marriages are “pointless and even oxymoronic” (Bennett, 2011, p.409). One does not need to fully agree with his assertions to acknowledge the intensity and goodness of his mind. Although Bennett’s stance constructs serious opposition and serves as a valuable argument, committing numerous logical fallacies in his text weaken his argument and made his overall reasoning less credible.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article ”For Gay Marriage,” author Andrew Sullivan argues for homosexuals to have equal rights as heterosexuals and that turning down these rights from them is taking away from their equality. Sullivan begins explaining his point on gay marriage by arguing with the definition of marriage. He explains that marriage simply just a strong, compelling bond between two individuals. He then continues the article by providing examples of…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "The Secular Case Against Gay Marriage." The Tech (M.I.T.) February 20th, 2004: "Homosexual relationships do nothing to serve the state interest of propagating society, so there is no reason to grant them the costly benefits of marriage. [...] When a state recognizes a marriage, it bestows upon the couple certain benefits which are costly to both the state and other individuals. Collecting a deceased spouse's social security, claiming an extra tax exemption for a spouse, and having the right to be covered under a spouse's health insurance policy are just a few examples of the costly benefits associated with marriage. In a sense, a married couple receives a subsidy. Why? Because a marriage between to unrelated heterosexuals is likely to result in a family with children, and propagation of society is a compelling state interest. For this reason, states have, in varying degrees, restricted from marriage couples unlikely to produce…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A battle has been in progress for years over whether equal rights and equal protection against discrimination should be extended to homosexual unions. Recently this has expanded into the area of marriage. The topic of homosexual marriage is a topical issue. There is absolutely no legal logical or governing reason that same- sex couples cannot be wed. It’s extremely unconstitutional to refuse them the right to marry. In 2012, we still have not legalised gay marriage in Australia when countries such as Spain and South Africa have. We live in a democratic country that is about rights and freedom of choice. Besides constitutional rights there are a number of economic issues which suggests equal rights for gay people could positively affect our economy.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marriage is considered a celebration, a right of passage, and in most religions, a holy union. It’s the happy ending in fairy tales, the front page of gossip magazines, and the premise for many romantic comedies. The legal benefits, while less glamorous than a cinderella wedding, are an important part of marriage that are often overlooked. According to Lifetips, a gay marriage advocate site, married couples have rights like inheritance, and property rights. Property rights refer to owning houses together, and being able to pay joint mortgages. Another important right that marriage allows is-of-kin, or conservator rights. These rights allow someone to make important medical decisions if their spouse is gravely ill. (Idealaunch) Married couples are also able to gain health insurance from one person’s employer, receive social security, Medicare and obtain disability benefits from ones husband or wife. (Marriage Rights & Benefits) Arguably one of the most important marriage rights is the ability to file for…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who is to say who we can and cannot marry? The main issue is that homosexuals cannot explore the chance of marrying the one the love, while heterosexuals can marry freely. This action of not being allowed to being married is an act of being inferior than others, and dehumanizing. Sullivan and Bennett aren’t the only ones with beliefs on gay marriage; there will always be an opinion of gay marriage. Now that gay marriage is a possibility across America, people have become more open minded, time is changing. Who knows maybe gay marriage will be accepted as straight…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gay marriages have been one of the hottest and controversial topics in our society. There are still problems concerning this issue of homosexuality and gay marriages. Same sex marriages are legal in Hawaii, but in all other states couples must be of the opposite sex to form a marriage. Hawaii’s decision to legalize same sex marriages is considered a milestone victory for gays and may cause a ripple affect for similar action in other states. Those who support gay marriages justify their position by the concept of love. These supporters of gay marriages feel as though gay people are being deprived of their right to love. Many people believe that gay people deserve the right to love and to take that love and form a marriage. These people believe that gays want to feel justified, meaning that as a couple they should be able to define their own marriage for themselves and make their own set of rules. Supports of same-sex marriages feel as though homosexuals are being deprived of their God given right to get married. They believe that arguments against same sex marriages are unconstitutional, and they simply do not justify a ban on same sex marriages. It is not the idea of two people of the same sex getting married that frightens people so much, but it is the thought of change and the fact that the federal government will redefine marriage to allow same sex unions. When people picture the results of same sex marriages, they see images of unstable homes. Everyone would probably agree that homosexuality has changed our society, and legalizing same sex marriages is not likely to be an exception. It would be an injustice to discriminate against a person if he or she were…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    For heterosexuals, straight marriage would remain the most significant--and only legal social bond. Gay marriage could only delegitimize straight marriage if it were a real alternative to it, and this is clearly not true. To put it bluntly, there's precious little evidence that straights could be persuaded by any law to have sex with--let alone marry--someone of their own sex. The only possible effect of this sort would be to persuade gay men and women who force themselves into heterosexual marriage (often at appalling cost to themselves and their families) to find a focus for their family instincts in a more personally positive environment. But this is clearly a plus, not a minus: gay marriage could both avoid a lot of tortured families and create the possibility for many happier ones. It is not, in short, a denial of family values. It's an extension of…

    • 3059 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Marriage is one of the most important experiences of a person’s life, but like any legal process, it can get complicated. (How Marriage Works). “When you need license to do something it means either people in general are not mature enough to do it or it needs special skills, which are to be tested before you can be allowed to do it. So, if you have license to do something, it means you are different and special from the rest of the herd.” (What is a marriage license). Since it is obvious that there are no special skills needed for marriage, it is safe to assume that maturity is the issue at hand. Allowing people of any age to marry would be preposterous. For example, girls in foreign countries such as India and Afghanistan traditionally wed before their twelfth birthday. Many of these relationships proved to be hostile to the girls involved. The United States has enough domestic violence with age requirements on marriage. We don’t need to add the element of adding no age requirement to marriage. The idea of abolishing marriage as a legal entity is foolish. Doing so would be like attempting to recreate the heavens and earth. Just to name a few legal benefits married people receive that single people do not…Tax benefits such as filing joint tax returns, the ability to receive Medicare, Social Security, disability and veteran’s benefits for a spouse, and discount or family rates for auto, health and homeowners insurance.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics