Absolute Monarchy Comparison The three absolute monarchs that are being compared are Philip II of Spain, Queen Elizabeth I of England, and Louis XIV of France. There are many things that are similar and many that are different in their rules. It is valuable to find parallels in their rules and compare mistakes and successes made every one of these monarchs in the three most important areas of government. The three areas of rule that are being specifically looked at are their foreign policy, their religious policy, and the economic concerns and decisions of their respective rules. Each one of these areas are intertwined and effect each other largely so looking for similarities is imperative for learning. The first area, and the area that affected the monarchs decisions in other areas the most, was religion. While Philip II and Louis XIV were both catholic, Queen Elizabeth was protestant, and were Philip II and Louis XIV were both very strict in enforcing a state religion Queen Elizabeth was much more lax. Because of their religious policy both Philip II’s and Louis XIV’s economy was irrevocably influenced. Philip II lack of religious tolerance combined with constant suspicion of the Marranos and the Moriscos both had immense effects on his economy. The constant support of the inquisitions tactics and suspicion caused the Moriscos to revolt. The Moriscos were defeated and expelled from the country. The animosity towards the Protestants caused a revolt by the Dutch and a humiliating defeat dealt to the Spanish Armada by the English Navy. The defeat of the Armada marked the decline of Spain’s naval power while the Dutch revolt marked the start of both English and Dutch “Sea Dogs” reign of terror on Spanish ships. Louis XIV was also apposed to Protestants and this also had devastating affects on his country. In sixteen-eighty-five the Edict of Nantes was repealed. This meant the Huguenots would no longer be able to practice their Protestant religion in France. This resulted in two hundred thousand Huguenots migrating out of the country. Among these people were skilled workman, military leaders, and prosperous merchants. This deprived the economy of a massive amount of jobs. As opposed to the last two monarchs Queen Elizabeth was very tolerant, although she did kill Queen Mary of the Scots because of her Catholic faith. In regards to religion Philip II and Louis XIV were very similar, but Louis XIV seemed to be much less extreme. The second area was the economy. Philip II’s wars drained Spain’s monetary supply which forced him to borrow from other countries. He also suffered from inflation caused by the supply of precious metals that were streaming in from his oversea empire. Because of these debts coupled with inflation taxes were raised sharply on the middle class which caused many skilled Muslims and Jews to leave the country. Louis XIV also amassed a large dept by the end of his rule. He spent large amounts of money on salaries for the nobles, the War of Spanish Succession, and also on the arts. He also sparred the noble, clergy, and various other government officials from taxation. This left a huge burden on the lower class that was forced to pay taxes. Queen Elizabeth’s kingdom was badly in dept when she inherited it and badly in dept when she died. She spent lavishly in when it came to her court, but was very frugal in other matters. She tightly controlled all work by passing the Statutes of Apprentices which required everyone to work where they were born. She also passed the poor laws which required each area to take care of their poor and homeless. Every one of these three monarchs amassed large amounts of dept throughout their time as the ruling monarch. The third area was foreign policy. Philip II fought in his own country, but also against the English and the Ottoman Turks. While he defeated the Turks the English navy obliterated his armada. Louis XIV fought in the War of the Spanish Succession which lasted twelve years. Peace was reached in seventeen thirteen when the Treaty of Utrecht was signed. The treaty made sure that Spain and France never be united under the same crown, it also gave England a trade agreement with Spain and forced France to give up Acadia. Queen Elizabeth made her country a balancing country to make sure no one country got to powerful. She also fought the Spanish Armada.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Louis 2 did not support the Edict of Nantes that had been adopted in the previous century. Protestant clergy men were exiled from the land, and supporters of this faith were condemned to live a life of slavery and their children were baptized as Catholics against their…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state…
- 402 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
He collected taxes without the consent of the estates general in order establish many things, fund a series of wars, build a bigger and stronger military and to build his palace, the Palace of Versailles, when it was built he insisted that the nobles spend more time there (Doc 2). This eventually led the nobles into debt because they spent most of their time and money at the Palace of Versailles. The nobles being in debt meant that they lost status and power, which ultimately fed the basis for the French Revolution. Document 3 states; “The aftermath of the revocation was disastrous for France. Many of those who abjured [gave up] their Protestant religion repented of their weakness.”(Doc 3) This demonstrates that the removal of the Edict of Nantes drove people insane because it granted the people France substantial rights, however when the rights were removed by Louis XIV people became infuriated, which is another reason to why the French Revolution occurred. Fundamentally, the actions that Louis XIV took had a great impact towards his people. His actions ultimately led the people of France initiate the French Revolution, which left France and its people at a vulnerable…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The 17th and 18th centuries were a period filled with nation building and expansion across the globe as extensive, and often overseas, holdings became an indicator of a strong and wealthy country in this politically competitive era. However, the extent of a ruler's control was not their only concern. Many monarchs throughout Europe took great initiative to consolidate and increase their power, building absolute monarchies in which they held absolute power. The pursuit of political absolutism frequently stemmed from past conflict involving the various monarchs and included practices such as increasing the authority and control over the nobility, building standing armies, and independently collecting funds, the manner of which were similar between many rulers. An increase in the subjugation and control of nobles is most evident in the reigns of Louis XIV of France as well as…
- 2606 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
European monarchy was in full force between 1400 and 1800, in a variety of nations and ways. Phillip II of Spain and Fredrick William the 1st of Prussia were monarchs with similar approaches in terms of absolutist reign accompanied by a strong military, yet they differed on foreign policy, economics, and religion.…
- 648 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…
- 747 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After he took power, Louis XIV made the nobility tax exempt, so the heavy burden of the taxes lied on the peasants, which made their already hard lives even tougher. In document 3, it explains how Louis XIV keeps his courtier in line so that they stay diligent in pleasing him. The documents also depicts his oppressiveness, stating that Louis XIV had many spies that tattled on anyone of any class which ruined the person’s life since the king was a prejudice who did not bother to ask for explanations. Other cruel changes he made during his rule was revoking the Edict of Nantes, which tolerated the Huguenots in France and gave them religious rights. In place of the Edict of Fontainebleau, which allowed the destruction of all Protestant churches and schools throughout France. During the War of the Spanish Succession, Louis XIV prioritized his personal interests above his country’s because he wanted to insure his grandson's, Philip V, right to inherit the Spanish Empire. The war weakened France and situated the country in a huge financial debt, which was blamed on Louis XIV. This shows his views on how to be a proper role of an absolute monarch; apparently, you can do whatever you want since you hold the power and as long as you keep those who have the ability to rebel under control. It also implies that his views are that…
- 1168 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
As King Louis XVI reined over France during the French Revolution his actions heavily impacted the revolution. When he took over as king in 1774 the country was in severe financial crisis; extravagant spending for the American Revolution left the country on the brink of bankruptcy (History.com Staff 2009). Heavy taxes were imposed which were impossible for the Third Estate (the common people) to pay due to low harvests. King Louis XVI was not popular by the citizens which resulted in outbreaks to overthrow him.…
- 417 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
They hoped to gain power by sanctioning the monarch. Bands of fighters, led by nobles, terrorized and plundered the lower classes around the country in an effort to deteriorate the king's authority. Eventually, they hired Spanish troops to carry on their fight, even though Spain and France were presently at war. Although the movement failed, it left an enduring imprint on the general public as to the worth of having a commanding monarch to safeguard them from things in analogous nature to the revolt. When the Cardinal died in 1661, Louis XIV, whom Cardinal Mazarin had been governing for a while, took supremacy. Louis XIV became the absolute, resilient ruler that France had been looking for to reestablish order in France. Louis XIV took hold of the country and put himself at the head of government. An excerpt from Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture states, “Without this absolute authority, the king could neither do good nor prevent evil. His power must be such that no one can hope to escape him”. It also states that, “Royal power is absolute”, and, “All the power of the individual subjects is united in the person of the king” (Bishop Jacques Bossuet). The Estates General was never called together, and most of the…
- 949 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
3.) The Bourbons were a high-class family who championed the Calvinists. The Bourbons were important because they unified France with the small kingdom of Navarre, which helped overthrow the monarchy during the French Revolution. (1577) 4.) The Edict of Nantes was issued by King Henry VI, which granted limited toleration to the Huguenots. The Edict of Nantes was significant because it allowed Protestants to worship in their own homes; it protected the rights of the minority, and opened public office to the Huguenots.…
- 150 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
Louis XIV, Peter the Great, and Tokugawa Ieyasu all considered their own power and strengthened their states in many different ways but their actions were all similar. They united their states, introduced reforms and assessed their power and the effect that they could have on others. Although their techniques were different, the ways these monarchs ruled their states show great similarities.…
- 655 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In addition, the way the absolute monarch governed was fairly liked by the citizens in this time period since the monarch provided the people with their needs, such as roads, and public buildings. Absolute monarch was beneficial for the people and that is why no one really tried to revolt in 17th and 18th centuries. However, later in the…
- 429 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
An important characteristic of “new monarchs” of the late 15th and 16th centuries was their strong sense of royal authority and national purpose.…
- 1938 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
When Louis XIV came into power, he was too young to rule the nation on his own for he was only 5 years old. His chief minister, Cardinal Mazarin, who ruled until his death in 1661, had one goal in mind, absolute rule by the royal administration. For 3 years, French noblemen rebelled against this with the claim that they were not rioting against the king, but merely the appointed. At the same time, James VI of Scotland became James I of England and created the Stuart Dynasty. The Stuart Dynasty’s main objective was the same as France, absolute power, leaving the nobles and the elites handicapped. They, however, rebelled victoriously against the new law. In both countries, the monarchy wanted complete absolutism. One prevailed and the other compromised.…
- 592 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the early 16th and seventeenth century various absolute monarchs had positive and negative effects on their place of rule in europe. Philip II of spain, son of Charles XI,an absolute monarch of Spain brought to power by the divine right ( when someone states god gave them the right to do something.) Philip II a superstitious king who ruled Spain ultimately affects the country negatively . In the year 1527 Philip II of Spain is born, son of Charles the fifth (the current king of Spain at that time) and mothered by Isabella of Britannica and Portugal.…
- 925 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays