Preview

Absolutism - 2

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
550 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism - 2
Europe’s nobility saw absolutism as a complete loss of political power and influence. Absolutism was the governmental principle that the reigning monarch has a great, divine power, which is hindered by no one else within the country they rule. The 17th and 18th centuries was period in which nobles once held power and influence over government was diminished to the precipice of oblivion. King Louis XIV in France, the Hohenzollerns of Prussia, and Peter the Great of Russia all sought complete control of their territories. Although their economic statuses remained, the power of the European nobles had weakened. After the Sun King stated, “I am the state,” the people of France knew that he was the only, divine ruler of their country, and were made to believe that anything he does is infallible. During his reign, the nobility didn’t have much say in the French laws, foreign policies, or commerce, but were house at Louis’ palace at Versailles to keep them close and happy. Most nobles were exempt from taxation and boasted great wealth, but had no political influence. A majority of Louis’s reign was spent in war, which forced many nobles to fulfill their obligation as soldiers. The French nobility preserved their privileged position under Louis XIV, but never obtained the political titles taken over by ministers, bishops, and France’s top thinkers Russia’s Tsar, Peter the Great, had a great dominance of power during his reign and never distributed it with the nobility . St. Petersburg, a port city with western influence, became the new capital of Russia after its move from Moscow. The Tsar forced his nobles to cut off their beards (a sign of God’s favorability), wear common clothes, and live a western lifestyle as commoners. The creation of the Table of Ranks made sure that nobles who sought to serve high positions were “important” enough to do so. As is custom with most nobles, the Russian nobles owned vast amounts of land and serfs, much like the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To make a long story short, Louis XIV tried to have power over everything and everyone possible, including the clergy. Absolutism became a well-known term during this period and basically was a political theory that sought to ? encourage rulers to claim complete sovereignty within their territories.? As an absolute monarch you could ?make laws,…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 17th and 18th centuries were a period filled with nation building and expansion across the globe as extensive, and often overseas, holdings became an indicator of a strong and wealthy country in this politically competitive era. However, the extent of a ruler's control was not their only concern. Many monarchs throughout Europe took great initiative to consolidate and increase their power, building absolute monarchies in which they held absolute power. The pursuit of political absolutism frequently stemmed from past conflict involving the various monarchs and included practices such as increasing the authority and control over the nobility, building standing armies, and independently collecting funds, the manner of which were similar between many rulers. An increase in the subjugation and control of nobles is most evident in the reigns of Louis XIV of France as well as…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Louis XIV was one of France’s most effective and powerful monarchs. He strengthened his rule with a policy of absolutism. Where the king gained authority directly from God or the divine right to rule. There were no legal limits to the powers that the king could exercise, however, during his rule a monarch had certain influential groups of people who the king needed to negotiate and consult in order to establish an effective functioning government. Among these groups where the land owning nobility, royal officer nobles, the royal commissioners, the Catholic Church, the bourgeoisie and the peasants. More notably seen the King Louis XIV is regarded as the “sun king” because of the great grandeur he exemplified during his reign. The book, Louis XIV and Absolutism by William Beik, presents a balanced outlook into the first half of Louis’ rule in France and how he was able to use absolutism to solidify his reign.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Enlightenment is touted by modern historians as a time of intellectual and social advancement, an era of optimism and freedom unheard of in earlier times. The era of absolutism is seen as a time of mounting liberty that contributed to the rise of democracy in the Americas and elsewhere. In reality, the "Enlightened Despotism" of the absolutist leaders was more in keeping with the tyrannical rulers of the pre-reformation Holy Roman Empire than with the democratic republic of modern America. Three of the most prominent absolutist leaders were Catherine the Great of Russia, Frederick the Great of Prussia and Louis XIV of France - these three leaders are perfect examples of the avarice, tyranny and lust for power that characterizes the Enlightened Despots.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Motivated by several crises in the Seventeenth century, rebellions and civil wars for instance The Thirty Years War, the need for states to create larger armies to attain greater monarchial power, to sustain that power and armies they had to find ways to fund their armies and still maintain control over the state (William J. Duiker and Jackson J. Spielvogel World History, vol. 1, 434). In response to this people searched for order. Many sought stability, but in order to obtain it they had to increase their monarchial power. The end result of this absolute monarchial power became well known as absolutism or absolute monarchy. In Absolutism the king claims to rule by divine right: the idea that Kings received their power to rule directly from…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism was very prominent in Europe during the 16th century. Absolutism is a basic historical term meaning monarchial power that is unaffected by other bodies of power. This can include churches, legislatures, or social elites. This was brought up from the assumption of power. This also brings in the term of the belief of the "Divine Right". This power was very strong and meant that a certain person was chosen by God to be a King, Queen, or any position in high power. Both Eastern and Western Europe were very similar and contrasted in the way they used absolutism. In the body paragraphs below, it will be explained why they are similar and differ.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Louis XIV came into power, he was too young to rule the nation on his own for he was only 5 years old. His chief minister, Cardinal Mazarin, who ruled until his death in 1661, had one goal in mind, absolute rule by the royal administration. For 3 years, French noblemen rebelled against this with the claim that they were not rioting against the king, but merely the appointed. At the same time, James VI of Scotland became James I of England and created the Stuart Dynasty. The Stuart Dynasty’s main objective was the same as France, absolute power, leaving the nobles and the elites handicapped. They, however, rebelled victoriously against the new law. In both countries, the monarchy wanted complete absolutism. One prevailed and the other compromised.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism was the most significant cause of the French Revolution because it forced a weak leader such as Louis XVI to have the power to ruin a whole country. Absolutism is a form of government in which the king or queen has absolute control over the land and people. King Louis XIV, an absolute monarch and heir, inherited the French throne at his grandfather’s death in 1643. He was only 5 at the time he started to rule. Louis XIV has been perceived in history as someone who is lazy, shy and awkward, characteristics that are not supposed to describe a leader.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In France, starting with Henry IV, the status of nobility started to fall when Henry started the idea of "nobles of the robe" in which middle class citizens could buy nobility from the king. This diluted the nobles, which weakened their power and hurt them considerably. Louis XIII and his son continued this and took more of their power away as well. Cardinal Richelieu started the intendant system, which recruited members of the middle class t watch the nobles and report back to the king. This took away power from the nobles to have less influence in the government of France. Continuing the intendant system, Louis XIV had also built the palace of Versailles and forced the nobles to move in. This caused the nobles to fight for the attention of the king and they focused less on the issues of France. Also, living in the palace of the king, one could always watch the nobles to make sure they weren't planning, for example, an uprising. In conclusion, French kings took steps to ensure absolute power and took away the power of the nobles.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xvi

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Louis XIV is known as being one of the most remarkable monarchs in history. He reined for seventy-two years (1643-1715) and from 1661, he personally controlled French government. The 17th century is labelled as the age of Louis XIV. Louis XIV, was a strong believer in “absolutism” - term used to describe a form of monarchical power that is unrestrained by any other institutions, such as churches, legislatures, or social elites. In other words, the monarch has complete power over the state and its individuals who inhabit this state. Absolutism focuses on three main aspects: the first is to create war and peace, the second to regulate religion and the third was to oversee economic activity. Throughout his reign, he was able to follow these standards and maintain success. This essay will take a look at what exactly is absolutism, what Louis XVI thinks some of the qualities an effective monarch possesses and some of the obstacles to absolute rule.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In central and Eastern Europe absolutism was built on social and economic power. During the period from 1050 to 1300 personal and economic freedom for peasants increased, but after 1300 princes and nobles restored harsh serfdom on peasants. The serfdom would ban peasants from leaving the land without the lords permission, lords would take more of the land and impose heavier obligations on the peasants. Later, the hereditary serfdom was reestablished in Poland, Russia, and Prussia. The hereditary serfdom accompanied the growth of estate agriculture.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Graded Absolutism

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ethics is a system of moral principles that “deals with what is morally right and wrong” (Geisler). The Bible clearly demonstrates that a hierarchy of Divine moral values exist which should govern all of our moral decisions in life, but sometimes there are moral laws are combined with principals and conflicts arise. In Normal L. Geisler’s book Christian Ethics: Contemporary Issues & Options he gives direction when two divine commands conflict each other and how ethical situations can be concluded as right versus wrong or absolute versus non-absolute. Absolute morals are based upon Christian ethics. According to Geisler there are six ethical systems or ways to approach conflicting moral absolutes. Three of these ethical systems are absolute and 3 are non absolute. Graded absolutes and generalism are two of the ethical systems that have conflicting moral principles or obligations.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays