Preview

Absolutism DBQ

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism DBQ
Mike Chang 11/1/08 Mrs. Lee Global DBQ

In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries there were two main forms of government. The two main forms of government were democracy and absolutism. Both of these types of government were effective in there own ways. Absolutism was the most effective type of government during that time period. Absolutism is when the ruler has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people of their nation. Many rulers had a democracy government but absolutism was more effective because the rulers had all the power and it was hard to take advantage of them instead of a democracy where many rulers can get over thrown by the people of that country.

Two forms of government that were used during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries were democracy and absolutism. Both of these forms of governments were effective in there own ways, absolutism was more effective. Machiavelli wrote "The Prince" which was a simply a textbook on monarchy. He said the best way to rule was to be feared. Machiavelli wrote in his book that "Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared, for love is held by a bond of obligation which, as men are wicked, is broken whenever personal advantage suggests it" (Document 1). King James I also believed that absolutism was the way to rule. He thought that kings were like gods therefore he believed in divine right. Divine Right is the authority to rule directly from God. "The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth; for kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth, and sit upon God's throne, but even by God himself they are called gods" (Document 2). Another person that ruled in absolutism was Thomas Hobbes. He felt that people were naturally cruel unless controlled strictly by law. He was not very popular because John Locke overshadowed him. Hobbes wrote a book named "Leviathan" says that life would be constant warfare without a strong government to control

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Can you believe that in the past the governments were very different compared to today’s government? The English government was very different compared to the French government, they both had their different ways. Besides the limited government of the English and the absolute government of the French they both have their weaknesses and strengths. I personally believe that the French form of absolutism was the more efficient form because of its strong stability, acceptable rights to the people, and able to make overall progress.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism created a time of prosperity throughout the 1500s and the 1600s. At this point of history, absolutism was an efficient way of running a government. Absolutist leaders were vigorous, assertive and a potent symbol of authority. The amount of industrial growth in countries such as Russia was both efficient and effective because the power of authority was concentrated into one person’s hands. Absolutism enabled Peter the Great to modernize and adapt Russia for war, commerce and industrial growth. Additionally, absolutism gave people a powerful leader they needed to trust in and depend on for their country's sake. This type of regnant is most evident King James I of England and King Louis XIV of France. For example, King James…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Motivated by several crises in the Seventeenth century, rebellions and civil wars for instance The Thirty Years War, the need for states to create larger armies to attain greater monarchial power, to sustain that power and armies they had to find ways to fund their armies and still maintain control over the state (William J. Duiker and Jackson J. Spielvogel World History, vol. 1, 434). In response to this people searched for order. Many sought stability, but in order to obtain it they had to increase their monarchial power. The end result of this absolute monarchial power became well known as absolutism or absolute monarchy. In Absolutism the king claims to rule by divine right: the idea that Kings received their power to rule directly from…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq 11 Absolutism

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to The Prince, by Machiavelli, who was from the Italian City-States during the rule of the Medici, portrayed that absolutism worked best when the ruler ruled through fear and not love. This was effective because “…fear is accompanied by the dread of punishment, which never relaxes.” This quote shows that people are scared of being punishment for wrong doing, and will be think twice before disobeying or disrespecting the Prince in any way. (Doc.1) Two Treatises on Government, by John Locke, who was in favor of democracy, stated in his work that the best types of government had a limitation of paper and that the citizens agreed with their thoughts.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Which form of government was most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries? Absolutism or Democracy?…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 17th century two future rulers, Peter the Great of Russia and Louis XIV of France, were born who would push absolutism to new heights. Absolutism is a form of government where all the power is in the hands of one individual. Absolute monarchies are the most common form of absolutism.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three major forms of government in the early modern period in Europe could be summarized by looking where the power is centralized. The first form, Absolutism also known as divine right kingship, is centralized to where the power was held by the Monarch and Monarch alone. The second form, Constitutionalism, is centralized by the idea of limited power. The existence of a fundamental governing law that made no one body of the ruling government, too powerful. The third and final form, Enlightened Despotism, is similar to Absolutism but it had limiting ideas which conflicted each other, they limited their growth with the rigid class structures and liberal ideas that were not implemented efficiently. The governments of the early modern period…

    • 153 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people in Europe preferred absolutist systems and many people also preferred the constitutional systems. Thomas Hobbes justified absolute authority and Locke provided the basis for constitutionalism. The both of them argued that all…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is a concept that rose during the late sixteenth century and early seventeenth century. The idea of Absolutism consisted of a belief that each country has a divine right from G-d to rule. Within each country, an absolute monarch rose to power. Each absolute monarch was economically in charge of taxes and politically in charge of mobilizing an army. Over time, Absolutism transforms into a social movement in which a king is in total control of his kingdom economically and politically.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, there were various forms of government, including democracy and absolutism. Not only is this an important topic because it deals with the government, but it also deals with the citizens and their perception of the government. However, at this time democracy was a better form of government because the people share the power with the government, the person in power does not have absolute power, and it protects the rights of the people.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke Vs Hobbes

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Leviathan, Thomas Hobbe’s argued that ordinary people were incapable of governing themselves and should willingly submit to the sovereignty of a supreme ruler. They carry out the ruler’s demands, and the ruler, in return, agrees to keep the peace. This type of political theory is know as Absolutism.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism

    • 717 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Prussia is not a state which possesses an army, rather an army that possesses a state.”…

    • 717 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism Vs Democracy

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page

    Democracy was the more effective form of government for the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe. With absolutism, a colony can refuse to obey any laws or commands once things are not going according to plan into making their nation powerful. A ruler can abuse their power, and start becoming selfish or injusticely in order to keep having more power. There is a possibility for an absolute monarch succeeding into increasing and strengthening the power of their empire. However it is also likely for a ruler to a mistake after another, making the empire taking matters into their own hands.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism in France

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the reign of the Bourbon dynasty of France, a distinct form of government known as absolutism developed, hoping to counteract the intensifying religious conflicts and the social fragmentation in Europe. Within the rule of the great Henry IV of Navarre, his son Louis XIII, and the prominent Louis XIV, the supreme authority of the monarch of France expanded exponentially, bringing about stability, prosperity, and public order. And through an unsettled, irresolute, and altering relationship with the nobility, the kings of France were able to exercise their immeasurable power over their kingdoms.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hobbes + Machiavelli

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Two of the greatest philosophers of all time are Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli. Hobbes was born in 1588 in England, when absolutism was taking hold in Europe. His most famous work was "Leviathan", written in 1651. Hobbes discussed the ideal state and innate laws of man and nature, among other things. Machiavelli was born in Italy in 1469, a time when his home country was ruled mostly by foreign powers. His hometown, Florence, was still independent. Machiavelli's most famous work, "The Prince", tells of his ideal state and ideal ruler. Machiavelli goes on to describe the perfect prince, a picture of cruelty and cunning. Though both genius philosophers, their views differ greatly. Hobbes believed in a minimalist government where the state only interfered with the lives of the citizens when it had to. The ideal kingdom was the kingdom of God, in Hobbes' mind. In Machiavelli's "The Prince", he describes his ideal government with a strong monarch, and fearful subjects. In Hobbes' system, a close relationship was kept with God, while in Machiavelli's reason was the only rule. The most important and most dealt-with area of dialogue is the "ideal" government.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays