Abstract and over Veiw on Euthanasia

Euthanasia and assisted suicide has become a strong subject on which all types of people have tried to find common ground and agree upon a decision. Most people argue in a sense of morals when I believe that this should be discussed based upon a set of basic ethics that most psychologists use now a days. If it is decided based mostly on morals then euthanasia will never become legalized. This essay is written based on a strong belief that Euthanasia and assisted suicide should be legalized. This essay contains a proposal that will benefit both the “moral” and “ethical” side of this ongoing topic by offering a system of checks and balances before the procedure. I will be addressing the counter arguments and problems that may occur with the proposal, the critiques of the proposal, and go into full detail of the said “proposal”. I will also provide accurate research based on a collection from various databases and my own experiments. The main purpose of this essay is to convince the reader to re consider euthanasia and think of it not as a form of “suicide“or “murder” but as a right to die with dignity. After all, it is impossible to perform euthanasia without the full consent and agreement of the subject that will undergo the decision. One of the most important public policy debates today surrounds the issues of euthanasia and assisted suicide. This issue is not only state-wide, it is also worldwide. Many have debated over the admittance of this policy and have tried to answer the question “Should the government allow and provide aid, resources, and etc. to the process of “mercy-killing”?” The outcome of that debate will profoundly affect family relationships, interaction between doctors and patients, and concepts of basic ethical behavior. With so much at stake, more is needed than a duel of one-liners, slogans and sound bites. Oregon, Washington, Montana, the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg are the only jurisdictions in the world where laws specifically