Preview

Acadians

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Acadians
Pittman 1

University of Nipissing

The expulsion of the Acadians in the Eyes of the British Officials

Miranda Pittman
0574359
HIST 1405
Dr. Darren Ferry
Tuesday October 16, 2012
Pittman 2 Charles Lawrence, Governor of the province of Nova Scotia made the decision of deporting the Acadians and his major superiors thought it was an intelligent dispatch [...] (Griffiths, 128). There are many different reasons to why the British Officials went through with this deportation. The British Officials conducted the expulsion of the Acadians between 1755 and 1758 from Nova Scotia. The Acadians were not fully trusted and became an obstacle for the British Officials to take full control of Nova Scotia. The British Officials wanted to follow through with the deportation because the Acadians wanted to remain neutral, the rising tension with the French and the Acadians refusal to sign the Oath of Allegiance caused the British to doubt the Acadian’s resolve to remain neutral. The British Officials wanted the Acadians to take the Oath of Allegiance, but the Acadians wanted to remain neutral between the British and the French. The Acadians stood their ground by not taking the Oath of Allegiance. Therefore, the biggest problem the British had for the Acadians was their neutrality. By staying neutral to both, the British could not trust that the Acadians would be more favourable to the French in a time of conflict. ‘The councilman also cited the Acadians recent behaviour. Those who favoured removing them argued that they had helped supply the French army and Mi’kmaq warriors and refused to sell provisions to the British except at exorbitant prices. [...], and the councilman assumed that they provided the French and Mi’kmaq useful intelligence’ (Plank, 110).
This quotes shows that the British Officials had suspicions that some of the Acadians were already working against them. The British Officials knew and understood they could not fully trust all

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffery Amherst served as commander-in-chief of the British army in North America during the French and Indian War where his success as a leader helped to defeat the French in North America. He is now best remember as a man with contempt towards Aboriginal people in North America and suggesting the idea of infecting these people with smallpox in an attempt to counter the Aboriginal forces threatening the civilians. His daily journal provides a higher level view of the situation and provides an indication to the direction the British were taking as well as the opinions of the Aboriginal people.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nor was the problem of the imperial debt the only one facing British leaders in the wake of the Seven Years' War. Maintaining order in America was a significant challenge. Even with Britain's acquisition of Canada from France, the prospects of peaceful relations with the Indian tribes were not good. As a result, the British decided to keep a standing army in America. This decision would lead to a variety of problems with the colonists. In addition, an Indian uprising on the Ohio frontier--Pontiac's Rebellion--led to the Proclamation of 1763, which forbade colonial settlement west of the Allegany Mountains. This, too, would lead to conflicts with land-hungry settlers and land speculators like George Washington (see map above).…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Britain had to do this to help loyal Canada on the northern frontiers and unite the Indians against Americans. The American authority also did not take any drastic action against British presence at the beginning because they better realized that if England had not been war-weary, she might have crushed the colonial armies. According to Vergennes, the French minister, ‘ . . You will notice that the English buy the peace more than they make it. Their concessions, in fact, as much as to the boundaries as to the fisheries and loyalists, exceed all that I should have thought possible.’ However, it was neither England’s unexpected generosity nor Shelburne’s foolishly ‘the dishonorable surrender’ as his critiques claimed. In fact, Shelburne wanted to shake off ‘the white men’s burden’ and desired to establish profitable commercial relationship and keep the United States away from French post-war influence as well as to avert future friction with the United States. What Shelburne aimed was to win over his three European foes i.e. France, Spain and Netherlands by reducing America from the ranks of enemy. Thus, he tried to lure Americans into a loose tie with the British Empire. This trend of Anglo-American relationship developed afterwards and stretched to the present though some bitter incidents occurred between…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    500 to 1000 black loyalists who were held as slaves by patriots, escaped to British lines and joined the British army. about 62,000 Loyalists relocated to Canada, and others to Britain (7,000) or to Florida or the West Indies (9,000. Nearly all black loyalists left for Nova Scotia, Florida, or England, where they could remain free.[123]Since Sir Guy Carleton intended to honor the promise of freedom, the British proposed a compromise that would compensate slave owners, and provide certificates of freedom plus the right to be evacuated to one of the British colonies to any Black person who could prove his service or status. The British transported more than 3,000 Black Loyalists to Nova Scotia, the greatest number of people of African descent to arrive there at any one time. One of their settlements, Birchtown, Nova Scotia was the largest free African community in North America for the first few years of its existence.Most died of disease but Britain took the survivors to Canada as free men. Black Loyalists found the northern climate and frontier conditions in Nova Scotia difficult, and were subject to discrimination by other Loyalist settlers, many of them slaveholders. In July 1784 Black Loyalists in Shelburne were targeted in the Shelburne Riots, the first recorded race riots in Canadian history. The Crown officials granted land to the Black Loyalists that was lesser quality, more rocky and hard to cultivate compared to that given to White…

    • 1759 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The French and Indian war had an interesting effect on the colonies. The overall morale within the colonies grew much and Britain gained much loyalty from its colonies. Document C emphasizes on the loyalty to the Crown, expressed by George Washington. It is clearly evident that there was much pride amongst the settlers as well as eagerness to serve the Mother Country. Britain's victory also continued to stir up colonial pride. In Document E, Rev. Thomas Bernard goes on to praise for the colonies' "indulgent Mother." The large growth of land from the French and Indian war became an odd factor in that it raised morale, yet after awhile, it began to destroy the unity between the British and the colonies.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French and Indian War Dbq

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The expansion of borders through the Treaty of Paris in 1763 caused political trouble between the colonists and the British. During the French and Indian war the Indians worked with the French with the hopes that defeating the English would halt the westward expansion into Indian Territory. The French forfeited all of this Indian land to the English with the Treaty of Paris. Most of the Indians thought that white settlers had no right to settle in these lands (Doc. B). Even after the war ended, there were still active attempts of retaliation by the Indians. Leader of these tribes, Pontiac, led a brutal campaign to drive the Englishmen out of the Ohio Country. They eventually overran all but three British posts west of the Appalachians. To avoid future conflict between Indians and the settlers, the British issued the Proclamation of 1763. This proclamation prohibited future settlement beyond the Appalachians. Colonists were enraged by this statement because they thought they were finally free to explore the land that their great grandfathers have gotten for them (Doc. E). After the war the colonists thought themselves as equal to their British brothers but this proclamation increased their…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I began my journey in August under the leadership of the great General Washington after he received news that the French would join us in September. Although I was extraordinarily skeptical at first, I must admit that our former enemies have been vital to this war for independence. However, my dislike for them still holds somewhat true, being as they were always criticizing the not-as-well equipped Americans. It seems to me that they were not here to fight for our independence, but that they were here to simply see the British lose part of their empire. I’m grateful for their help, but it irks me knowing that they were not here for the right reasons.…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlottetown Conference

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cartier felt that if he could persuade the Maritimes to join in a union, together their population would balance that of Upper Canada. In contrast, Brown wanted an end to what he considered French domination of English affairs - the end of a political stalemate. Macdonald was worried about American aggression and felt that the united British colonies, perhaps, could resist their powerful neighbour.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Letter of Father Jacques Bigot, respecting the mission of the Abnaquis at St. Missel de Sillery The Letter of Father Jacques Bigot, respecting the mission of the Abnaquis at St. Missel de Sillery (June 24th, 1681) from The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents Vol. LXII was written to relate recent events at the mission to Bigot’s recently departed predecessor Jacques Vaultier. Bigot mentions several positive changes in the seven months after Vaultier’s departure, notably, an increase in the indigenous population at the mission (Bigot mentions in a later passage how one hunter has left the mission to bring members of his family back) a decrease in their intoxication and an increase in their baptism. In support of these claims, he recounts of the baptism of a twenty-five person family: “there was but one woman who had once been slightly intoxicated, and who on that account felt deep regret when she saw her three adult children baptized, without her securing the same happiness.”…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    So the Indians and French told the colonies to go back to their place, but they did not listen. So…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acadian Research Paper

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page

    By the 1850s the Acadians were a larger minority than the Loyalists or Mi'kmaq in the Maritimes (although still less than 10% of the total population). They resided in small communities insulated by their own language.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment: 1763 marked the end of the French and Indian War, the final defeat of the French and their Native American allies in America. For America’s English colonists, this was a cause for great celebration and pride in the their English identity. But only twelve years later, these same American colonists found themselves locked in a bitter and violent conflict with the mother country that had so recently been the object of their proud respect. Even today the reasons behind this abrupt transition of England and her American colonies from allies to enemies are debated.…

    • 529 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes Of The Yamasee War

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the colonies, the English had not only African American slaves, but also Native American slaves. Native American slaves were seen as very profitable, as Ramsey tells, “a single slave sometimes [brought in] the same price as two hundred deerskins” (Ramsey, 36). It would be beneficial for the English to get more Native American slaves rather then African American. Some of the English, such as Thomas Nairne, had other hopes for the Indian slave trade. Nairne hoped that the slave trade would “in som few years . . . reduce these barbarians to a farr less number” (Ramsey 37). This quote shows the hostility of the English towards the Indians. The English wanted to get rid of the Native Americans and have them for slavery. Therefore, slavery was growing in South Carolina and it “became a slave society before it developed a plantation regime” (Ramsey, 51). Slavery stripped the Native Americans of some of their traditions. They were often found naming their children non-Nate American names. One important thing that Ramsey takes the time to point out is that “It may indicate, for instance, that white Carolinians considered Indian identity a greater potential threat than African identity” (Ramsey, 39). Ramsey’s point proves that the English knew what they were doing. If the Indians had their identity, it made them stronger. Stripping them of their identities left them vulnerable. Overall, the Native Americans were taken advantage of and used. Slavery added to the conflicts that gave way to the Yamasee…

    • 603 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I was a Acadian back in the 1755’s to the 1763’s I would take the oath of allegiance. My first, reason of why I would take the oath of allegiance is that if I didn’t take the oath I would be tortured and even be killed. By that I mean if didn’t take the oath of allegiance I would be tortured like would not get food or water and then eventually would be killed by the British. Also instead of being tortured in such bad ways I rather take the oath. Even though that isn’t fair because everybody's rights should matter. My second, reason of why I should take the oath of allegiance is that if I didn’t my house, land and everything else that belonged to me would have been set on fire. The reason behind the British doing this would be so I wouldn’t…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The British government never seemed to care about what the colonist wanted or what was best for them. All they cared about was themselves and what could benefit them in the long run. “Great Britain, without consideration, that her motive was interest not attachment; that she did not protect us from our enemies on out account, but from her enemies on her own account….” (Michael P. Johnson, p. 95) From that statement you can conclude that because the British didn’t think about how the colonist felt that’s what led them to there up…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays