The man believes himself to be pious by prosecuting the wrongdoer, in this case, his father. This is because murder, even if unintentional, is wrong and therefore should not go unpunished. Socrates rebuts this claim with the knowledge that there is more to being pious than only prosecuting wrongdoers, so this one action cannot define all things pious and impious. Euthyphro agrees to better answer the question, and in doing so, he changes his answer. “What is dear to the gods is pious, and what is not is impious,” (8) the man states. Again, Socrates finds a suitable argument for this answer. He says that if what Euthyphro stated were true, and if all of the gods were different, then piety toward one god would not be piety toward another. They agree that piety is that which all of the gods love, and impiety is that which all of the gods do not
The man believes himself to be pious by prosecuting the wrongdoer, in this case, his father. This is because murder, even if unintentional, is wrong and therefore should not go unpunished. Socrates rebuts this claim with the knowledge that there is more to being pious than only prosecuting wrongdoers, so this one action cannot define all things pious and impious. Euthyphro agrees to better answer the question, and in doing so, he changes his answer. “What is dear to the gods is pious, and what is not is impious,” (8) the man states. Again, Socrates finds a suitable argument for this answer. He says that if what Euthyphro stated were true, and if all of the gods were different, then piety toward one god would not be piety toward another. They agree that piety is that which all of the gods love, and impiety is that which all of the gods do not