Preview

Acesite Corporation vs. Nlrc

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
484 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Acesite Corporation vs. Nlrc
Acesite Corporation vs. NLRC
Facts:
* Leo A. Gonzales (Gonzales) was a Chief of Security of Acesite Corporation. * Gonzales took several leaves (sick leave, emergency leave, and vacation leave), thereby using up all leaves that he was entitled for the year. * Before the expiration of his 12-day vacation leave, Gonzales filed an application for emergency leave for 10 days commencing on April 30 up to May 13, 1998.The application was not, however, approved. * He received a telegram informing him of the disapproval and asking him to report back for work on April 30, 1998. However Gonzales did not report for work on the said date. * On May 5, 1998, Acesite sent him a final telegram in his provincial address containing in order for Gonzales to report back to work. * Gonzales, who claims to have received the May 5, 1998 telegram only in the afternoon of May 7, 1998, immediately repaired back to Manila on May 8, 1998 only to be “humiliatingly and ignominiously barred by the guard (a subordinate of [Gonzales]) from entering the premises.” * It appears that on May 7, 1998, the issued notice of termination was thru an inter-office memo. * Gonzales thus filed on May 27, 1998 a complaint against Acesite for illegal dismissal with prayer for reinstatement and payment of full backwages, etc. * Acesite claims, Gonzales “showed no respect for the lawful orders for him to report back to work and repeatedly ignored all telegrams sent to him,” and it merely exercised its legal right to dismiss him under the House Code of Discipline. * LA - the complaint for lack of merit, its holding that Gonzales was dismissed for just cause and was not denied of due process. * NLRC - reversed that of the Labor Arbiter. * CA - finding that Gonzales was illegally dismissed, affirmed with modification the NLRC decision.
Issue:
* WON Gonzales was legally dismissed for just cause.
Held:
* No. there appears to have been no just cause to dismiss

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-3708 > , Defendant-Appellee. N On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. No. 02-00708—James G. Carr, Chief District Judge. Argued: June 23, 2006 Decided and Filed: July 22, 2008 Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge; BELL, Chief District Judge.* _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves, LAW OFFICE, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee ON BRIEF: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves,…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Officers asked Rojas what was the issue was about. Rojas explained that she had been in a fight. When the officers stepped into the apartment they spotted the petitioner, who had a shaved head with a gang symbol tattooed on his head inside the kitchen wearing only boxer shorts and sweating. Assuming that the assault was recent they decided to separate them. Fernandez responded to the officers “you don't have any rights to come here, i know my rights.” The officers physically removed Fernandez despite his warning and took him into custody. After removing Fernandez from the property he was later identified as the lead assailant in the Lopez…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Garcetti V Ceballos

    • 2803 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Richard Ceballos had been employed since 1989 as a deputy district attorney for the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office, which at the time was headed by Gil Garcetti. After the defense attorney in a pending criminal case contacted Ceballos about his motion to challenge a critical search warrant based on inaccuracies in the supporting affidavit, Ceballos conducted his own investigation and determined that the affidavit contained serious misrepresentations. Ceballos contacted the deputy sheriff who had sworn out the affidavit, but was not satisfied by his explanations. Ceballos then communicated his findings to his supervisors and submitted a memorandum in which he recommended dismissal of the case. A meeting was subsequently held to discuss the affidavit with his superiors and officials from the sheriff's department, which Ceballos claimed became heated and accusatory of his role in handling the case. Despite Ceballos’ concerns, his supervisor decided to proceed with the prosecution. The criminal trial court held a hearing on the motion, during which Ceballos was called by the defense to recount his observations about the affidavit. The trial court nevertheless denied the motion and upheld the warrant.…

    • 2803 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    to concede them in his negotiations with a Spanish minister (Document 6). Rights were not…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dog Bite Memo

    • 3149 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Under the Georgia false imprisonment statute, whether Charlene Miller has a valid claim against the Center for Independent Performers and Artists (CIPA) when the security guards (1) searched Charlene suspecting her of having stolen a CD; and (2) confiscated the iPhone for inspection suspecting her illegal recording?…

    • 3149 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Upon return to location, a message was logged in the staff to staff book, about this and on reflection through staff discussion, decided that his best interest would be not to take him there again.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The parties in this case are Elian Gonzalez with Lazaro Gonzalez and Attorney General Janet Reno. In November 25, 1999 the United States Coast Guard intercepted two fishermen who had rescued five- year- old Elian Gonzalez floating on an inner tube in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast from Florida. Elian’s mother had died during the voyage from Cuba to the United States. The United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”) granted Plaintiff a temporary deferral of his inspection and placed him in the care of his paternal great uncle, Lazaro Gonzalez, who resides in Miami, Florida.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ucmj Article 86

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Going further into absence from unit, organizaton, or place of duty with intent to avoid maneuvers or field exercises.…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    BODY: A Message to Garcia is a small but inspirational essay written in 1899. It tells the story of the initiative of a soldier, a class of 1881 West Point graduate. This essay exhorts the reader to apply this attitude to his or her own career and in life as an avenue to success. It starts by telling us about the conflicts growing between the United States and the Spanish, who at the time ruled Cuba. President at the time William McKinley saw a great value in establishing contact with the Cuban rebels who he thought would make a valuable ally in case of war with Spain. President McKinley asked Colonel Arthur L. Wagner to suggest a dependable officer to make contact with Calixto Garcia, one of the leaders of the rebels. Colonel Wagner suggested a man by the name of Andrew Rowan, a Captain at the time. He was assigned and accomplished a daunting mission, giving a message to Garcia. Rowan asked no questions, made no objections, requested no help, but accomplished his mission. Rowan met Garcia in the…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    J.E.B. is the petitioner, the state of Alabama, (representing T.B. - an un-wed mother of a minor child), is the respondent. The petitioner’s claim is that, by striking men from his jury, Alabama violated his constitutional rights. According to the text, J.E.B. appealed to the U.S Supreme court since the Alabama State Supreme court denied, certiorari (which involves an order of a lower court to send the record of case to the Supreme Court).…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    couldn’t bring it upon himself to tattle on Beterli and force him out of the candidacy.” (126)…

    • 731 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Digest Crim Pro

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Held: NO denial of due process. Petitioners were given several opportunities to present their side at the pre-trial investigation, first at the scheduled hearing of February 12, 1990, and then again after the denial of their motion of February 21, 1990, when they were given until March 7, 1990, to submit their counter-affidavits. On that date, they filed instead a verbal motion for reconsideration which they were again…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The sole issue to be determined is whether the Court of Appeals committed grave abuse of discretion in affirming the finding of the ECC that petitioner’s ailment is not compensable under Presidential Decree No. 626, as amended.…

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Order No.3 – The President ordered that all executive departments, bureaus, offices, agencies and instrumentalities of the National Government, government owned or controlled corporations, as well all governments of all the provinces, cities, municipalities and barrios should continue to function under their present officers and employees, until otherwise ordered by the President or by his duly designated representatives. The President further ordered that the Judiciary should continue to function in accordance with its present organization and personnel, and should try and decide in accordance with existing laws all criminal and civil cases, except certain cases enumerated in the Order.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics