In my situation I can say I
In my situation I can say I
As can be seen, Dr. King rather uses non-violent direct action. It created a crisis which created a tension among the white people. It made them force to approach an issue even after refusing to negotiate. This action lead to many success at the end which granted “freedom”. As of now, it seems like we are heading into a similar situation in the near future. I would follow Dr. Kings steps to persuade the audience to create friendly environment where quality, diversity, and generosity exist throughout the whole…
King’s leadership resulted in one of the the greatest non-violent mass protests in the history of the western world. King represented a sense of hope and promise to the followers of the Civil Rights Movement. The most important aspect to understand in this debate is King’s non-violence. With many other African-American leaders, such as Malcolm X, taking a more aggressive, violent approach to change, King saw the potential in Ghandi’s peaceful protests. As Fairclough writes, “Few blacks believed that the city’s businessmen would have accepted desegregation but for the double pressure of the demonstrations and the economic boycott of downtown stores” (209). The only effective events in the Civil Rights movements were those that followed King’s system of non-violence. While Carson argues that rather than King’s presence, “the success of the black movement required the mobilization of black communities…”(219), this assertion is made under the assumption that a non-violent leader would organize the masses. Without King’s leadership, there may have been an violent uprising that only led to more tensions between the…
The general argument made by King in his letter titled “ Letter from Birmingham Jail” is that in order for Blacks to get their rights they must use non-violent resistance. More specifically, King argues that they must demand that they get their rights and he states that with time, the non-violent resistance will make situations which will force whites to negotiate. There are two distinct sides to this very complicated issue, and while King argues that non-violent resistance is the key to acquiring their rights, one can see that the counter-argument that violence can be used as a tactic to acquire their rights may also be valid under the following circumstances such as the commence of the Zapatista movement, the American Revolution, and the…
The main point of Dr. Kings speech was that an injustice had been done to the black people. They were promised freedom from the emancipation proclamation, and up to that point they still were not free. They were segregated and treated like second class citizens. Were they supposed to just sit down and let white men at that time humiliate them, beat them, bomb their houses, and strip them of human dignity? NO! Dr. King was preaching to all who listened, that now was the time to metaphorically cash this check, a check that will give them upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice. But to do this, not with violence or retaliation, “we must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence “ (bourne, 1998). This would be the way Dr. King would want to see his dream played out, with non-violence. Were all his efforts done in vain?…
However, these clergymen did not necessarily agree that a nonviolent approach would bring about the necessary events that would provide a means for a legal change to the civil rights of African Americans. Although the clergymen disagreed that a nonviolent approach would be successful, King was determined to prove them wrong. Despite the numerous violent attacks toward African Americans, police brutality, and multiple bombings of African American’s houses King remained calm. King’s determination, perseverance, and courage is what led to his success in the Civil Rights Movement.…
In “The Ways of Meeting Oppression,” Martin Luther King Jr. primarily uses ethos to promote the practice of non-violent resistance against the struggle of oppression. In this persuasive piece, King uses ethos to appeal to the African Americans' sense of responsibility. By encouraging them to step up instead of passively accepting injustice, he is implying that he trusts they can do it. His argument is based on moral obligations rather than the practicality of the issue. His use of shared values or ethos such as “religion reminds every man that he is his brother's keeper,” enables the argument to remain in the realm of abstractness, which in turn remove the human tension. That makes it easier for him to change the attitudes of people, making…
A great example of this idea is and can be shown from Dr. King’s “I Have a Dream” speech. A fragment of his speech that stands out states, “ In the process of gaining our rightful place, we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plain of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protests to degenerate into physical violence” (lines 56 - 60) For that reason this statement is an excellent example of how African Americans had to struggle and attempt to acquire freedom and be respected as black men and women of the United States of America. In addition, this statement also proves that people must fight, not with fists but with words and behave in a civilized fashion. An additional sample of the struggle for freedom also comes from Dr. King’s speech, especially when he tells us that, “I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia, sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood.” This quote supports the idea of struggling for Freedom by stating on how the “sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners” be able to enjoy the magnificence of…
King uses logic and evidence to convince the reader about his reason for engaging in the nonviolent campaign. In the beginning, he explains that he is in Birmingham because injustice is prevalent, and that local affiliates had invited him to participate in the nonviolent action. Additionally, he made a promise and when the hour came, he fulfilled that promise. Dr. King is a man of God, and a man of God does not break a promise, especially when one is in need. Dr. King goes on to explain that it is unfortunate that current white power structure has left the African-American community with only one available course of action. He states that, "Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue"(301). Simply put, the African-American community would like to confront the issue with negotiations, but the white moderate is unwilling, and the most effective way to force a community to confront an issue is with a nonviolent direct action. Additionally, Dr. King goes on to state, "Lamentably, it is an historical fact that privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily"(301). Moreover, Dr. King expresses that Birmingham is one of the most thoroughly segregated cities in the United States. Also, it has a readily known ugly record of brutality. This simply strengthens his argument on the reason for their campaign in Birmingham, and brings in evidence that many people in the country know of the segregation that is so prevalent there. Dr. King backs up the logical course of action that was taken by bringing in evidence to the reader, especially the eight clergymen, showing that they are simply lacking knowledge of what truly is going on in Birmingham, and they misunderstood the true intentions for the nonviolent…
King maintains that there are four basic steps in nonviolent campaign which are “collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist, negotiation, self-purification, and direct action” (paragraph 6). He says that Birmingham is the most segregated city in the United States and he and his fellows have been through all those steps in Birmingham. He states that “Negros” have been through “unjust treatment”. In addition, African Americans are threatened by unsolved violent actions such as Bombing. With these situations, “Negro” leaders desired to negotiate with city councilor. When he had a chance to discuss with the people who are controlling economics in Birmingham about removing the racial signs in stores, they betrayed even though they agreed to forbid the discrimination (paragraph 7).…
“I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up, live out the true meaning of its creed: We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal.” All throughout history black have been mistreated. Whether it was slavery in early American history or segregation until the mid 1900’s. In the past, blacks were always being treated with such a condescending manner. Beyond question they have never received their God given rights of freedom. Martin Luther King Jr. was on a mission to give blacks the freedom they deserved and have been waiting for all throughout time. King was the leader of the nonviolent civil rights movement. While incarcerated in Birmingham jail King wrote a letter to eight clergymen (priest or minister of a Christian church) to get them to join his nonviolence movement. King utilizes allusions, anaphora, and pathos to convey his disappointed yet hopeful tone to explain why a nonviolent movement is necessary and attempt to persuade people to join him.…
Summary: Martin Luther King Jr.’s “The Ways of Meeting Oppressions”, clearly states his beliefs on how African American’s should rise against oppression in the South. Mr. King believed that people could become so overcome with oppression that they give up fighting their oppressor. He did not believe that giving in to oppression was the answer to solving civil rights issues in the south. King also believed physical violence was not the answer either, stating “Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral” in paragraph 4 of his writing. King believed that non-violent resistance was the way to fight for justice. By using non-violent resistance as a way to fight oppression, King believed it would be possible for African Americans to remain living in the South as they fought for their rights.…
MLK and Malcolm X once again are at their differences. MLK wanted to solve this problem with non violence whereas Malcolm X wanted to use violence to solve the problem. “Bomb our homes and threaten our children; send your hooded perpetrators of violence into our communities and drag us out on some wayside road, beating us and leaving us half dead, and we will still love you. But we will soon wear you down by our capacity to suffer” (Doc H) This is what MLK said in his Stride Toward Freedom book when he was finally starting the move of segregation being put to an end. He was saying that no matter how badly or how much the white people beat up the blacks, the blacks will still love them and respect them for who they are and not fight back because if they fought back it would just make everything worse. You can not fight one wrong with another wrong, two wrongs don’t make anything right. In the other hand, Malcolm X thought the best way to fix the racism was to fight it with violence. “ I believe we should protect ourselves be any means necessary when we are attacked by racists.” (Doc K) Malcolm is literally saying that if anyone gets attacked that they should fight back even though that isn’t always the safest plan. The safest way to go at this point would to just take in the beatings until the whites get sick of it and give up because it would be pointless to just fight back and…
There have been many forms of oppression throughout history. While many forms of oppression have been eradicated, many forms still exist in today’s society. Concerning the forms of oppression that have been eradicated, the question that comes to mind is how these forms of oppression were dealt with and what led to them being eradicated. The process of dealing with oppression in turn brings to light another question in how successful are the resistors’ approaches in dealing with oppression. There are two main distinct approaches to oppression which are violent resistance and non-violent resistances. Since there have been many oppressed groups that have seen success from nonviolent resistances to oppression, the focus of this paper will be taking a stance in proving that the oppressed do see success in nonviolent approaches. In analyzing this notion, I will discuss the forms of oppression portrayed in the film Pride by Stephen Beresford and Angela Davis’s chapter “Class and Race in the Early Women’s Rights Campaign.” I will then discuss the resistors’ approaches in dealing with oppression and give my opinion of the most effective way to resist oppression which is a union of many forms of resistances coming together. Finally, I will discuss how much power really…
Martin Luther King Jr. is a prime example as to why peaceful resistance to laws has a positive effect on a free society. King was a marquee figure in the civil rights movement in the 1960’s. King encouraged his followers to be peaceful in protest and not retaliate when punished for their civil disobedience. King goes about the protest in this way because of the effect the tactic of civil disobedience has on the opposition. When people are being subjected to beating and jail time, it shows strength and gets the point across of how important it is to change the current situation. if people are willing to be jailed and beat. Also it shows, the opposition that those who they are persecuting will not bring themselves to the level that they themselves are at. King.states “Do to us what you will and we still love you” and “In winning our freedom we will…
Martin Luther King, Jr. emerged as a pivotal leader in the Civil Rights Movement. Dr. King was an advocate for civil disobedience and peaceful protest. In 1963, following his arrest during a protest in Birmingham, Alabama, Dr. King wrote “Letter from Birmingham Jail” where various sources of oppression were described along with how to combat such oppression. In the letter, Martin Luther King, Jr. explained promises made to the African Community for equality that were never met. As a result of the broken promises, Dr. King called for pressure to be put on the authority figures who instigated such oppression. Dr. King described the pressure as a “direct action” and that the pressure would force negotiation to occur. Negative emotions were in the African American Community. Martin Luther King, Jr. wrote that these emotions could manifest themselves a violence, if not expressed. However, Dr. King warned against acts of violence to achieve the desired end of equality. In the letter, Martin Luther King, Jr. revealed to white leaders the racism faced by African Americans and the difficulties faced by the children of this…