Should a principal or other school authority be able to silence other forms of student speech? If so, under what conditions? How does speech by an individual student differ from speech by the school newspaper?…
I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…
In the majority opinion, Chief Justice Burger in the majority opinion stated, “The process of educating our youth for citizenship in public schools is not confined to books, the curriculum, and the civics class; schools must teach by example the shared values of a civilized social order… The schools, as instruments of the state, may determine that the essential lessons of civil, mature conduct cannot be conveyed in a school that tolerates lewd, indecent, or offensive speech and conduct such as that indulged in by this confused boy.” The decision was made in favor of the district because the speech was classified as “immature conduct” which means that the school has the power could act on this…
Josh Renville, an 18 year old student attending Fargo North High School has petitioned against the school in question for violating his first amendment right to freedom of speech. The school prohibited Renville from using a photograph in which he his holding his favorite rifle for his senior portrait in the yearbook. Renville claims that by prohibiting the photograph, the school is infringing on his rights to freedom of symbolic speech. Despite Renville’s claims, the actions taken by the administrators at Fargo North High were completely constitutional. Fargo North was acting well within their constitutional limits to promote the ideals of public education, to properly monitor any media that would have been associated with the school, and to limit any action that inherently interfered with the school’s disciplinary…
The reason why judges voted YES is because they say that Childrens are not necessarly guaranteed the full extent of the First Amendment. They add that the students did not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the school.…
It was simple to me. The school newspaper is about representing the whole school, not individual students themselves. Both sides could agree that the students were presenting their own views, but then this is where the sides start to split. The minority believed that since the students were expressing their own views, that the Tinker standard should apply. But, this was not applied because the students are not suppose to use the school newspaper as a public forum for discussion. The school newspaper is suppose to represent the whole school, and not just those writers. Therefore, the principal was doing nothing wrong by restricting the student’s rights when he censored and prevented the release of the articles in the…
In the case of Tinker v. Des Moines five brave students decided to wear black armbands to school in protest of the Vietnam War. Even though they were threatened with suspension they still decided to wear them. They got suspended until they would agree to not wear the armbands but still wore all black clothes to school for the rest of in year. Students should be able to protest in schools because of the first amendment, their opinions matter just as much as adults, and while some think they should students don’t just give up their constitutional rights just because they’re at school.…
In addressing your second question of Donnie’s rights being violated due to his writing “Zero Tolerance Sucks” on his t-shirt, A public school has an obligation to provide a safe and secure educational environment for all students. This is a very sensitive subject in our society. What one person deems to be perfectly fine is seriously offensive to another. School boards across the country are having to monitor and…
Schools may regulate student speech that results in a material and substantial disruption within the school. Tinker v. Des Moines Indep. Cmty. Sch. Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 509, 513 (1969). Garner Vo-Tech must show either that there was an actual disruption within the school or that officials reasonably anticipated a material and substantial disruption was likely to occur. Alternatively, the Court could expand the exception found in Morse that waives the disruption requirement and include speech that calls for the bullying and harassment of a specific student. Morse v. Fredrick, 551 U.S. 393, 407 (2007).…
The author, Seamus Deane, discusses the two greatest pieces that stood out and impacted his own writing style. He does so not by just writing down what exactly changed his mind, but rather presenting his two encounters and the following reactions.…
- court agreed that searches by school officials do not violate the Fourth Amendment as long as the official has “ reasonable grounds to believe that a student possesses evidence of illegal activity or activity that would interfere with school discipline…
First of all, Schools should be less harsh when it comes to disciplining students. Schools are punishing students for the most absurd reasons. For example, a New York girl was hauled out of class in handcuffs. Why? Because apparently she wrote on her desk with a erasable marker. In Houston, Texas an eighth grader was suspended for wearing rosary beads in memory of her late grandmother and the school insisted that the beads interpreted as gang involvement. The rules are too harsh and it seems like a child can't go to school without offending someone there. To me, this is completely ridiculous, students need to have a good learning environment in order for them to learn. With rules and policies like this, students might be too busy worrying about breaking rules to focus on whats really important and the whole reason why they're at school, their education.…
In 1965, a group of students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War. On December 15th, two students, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt, displayed armbands. The two students were sent home. The day after, John Tinker wore a black armband, and again, was sent home. The parents then sued the school district. The question at hand is whether or not the students’ First Amendment rights are being violated when they are prohibited from displaying armbands, in a public school, in the form of a protest. Both the district court and the 8th Circuit U.S. Court of appeals stated that it was within the schools jurisdiction to suspend the students. The Supreme Court ultimately…
The school will win the debate due to the fact that the school, of which the players were on was a private school. Since its a private organization they have the ability to enforce whatever it declares right or wrong, regardless of what the Bill of Rights states. It is due to this that the school-the private school- will win the case. It, just like the NFL is a private organization, and can enforce whater they find just within their system and will win. However, if this case were in the perspective of a public school, where the students are being punished for kneeling, have the ability to sue since there is state action- the schools decisions- and also they most likely will win since their was isn't any forms of negative freedom of speech. The court case will be brought up to the supreme court since there was state action(the school). The students will most likely win since the freedom speech can be considered as a type of silence, which does not perform any form of negative connotation. Since it wasn't negative the students will most likely win the…
Cyberbullying is not a disruptive factor to school systems as the public school systems are making it out to be. In the J.S v. blue mountain school district case, J.S created a Myspace profile about her middle school principle, the profile did not include the name of the principle or the school name just a picture of him. Students of course at the school talked about it but they have that right according to the 1st amendment it is the right to free speech. I feel that what she did didn’t cause harm to the principle or physical dangers of other students merely a simple joke. I feel that for her being suspended was an unreasonable action. The facts simply do not support the outcome that the school district could assume it disrupted any school ordinary day functions.…