Preview

Adjudication Chapter 7 Outline

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
433 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adjudication Chapter 7 Outline
Chapter 7: Defense Attorneys
I. Interpret the Four Major Legal Issues Surrounding the Right to Counsel
A. After Gideon v. Wainwright established a right to counsel for indigent felony defendants, courts have wrestled with four areas:
1. Right to counsel in nonfelony prosecutions
2. Stages of the criminal process
3. Ineffective assistance of counsel
4. Self-representation

II. Discuss How the Courtroom Work Group Affects How Defense Attorneys Represent Their Clients
A. Lawyers who work within the parameters of the courtroom work group receive benefits for their clients, including more case information from prosecutors and perhaps better plea bargains. Lawyers who are less cooperative find that they do not get favorable case-scheduling considerations and get less favorable plea bargains.

III. Why Most Lawyers Do Not Represent Criminal Defendants
A. Most lawyers practice civil law because it is more lucrative, they have higher prestige, and they have fewer problems dealing with clients.

IV. Compare and Contrast the Three Systems of Providing Indigents with Court-Appointed Attorneys
A. The three major ways of providing indigents with court appointed attorneys are:
1. Assigned counsel
2. Contract systems
3. Public defender
B. Studies find no major differences between these three systems in the results achieved.

V. Possible Tensions between Lawyers and Clients
A. Lawyers sometimes view their clients as not telling them the whole truth about a case and at times seeking to manipulate their lawyers. Defendants may view their attorneys as not fighting hard enough for them and seeking to accommodate the judge and prosecutor.

VI. Analyze the Importance of Legal Ethics to the Defense of Criminal Defendants
A. Legal ethics seek to ensure that lawyers will zealously advocate for their clients. Lawyers must assert valid defense and ensure confidentially. But legal ethics places professional limits on how far that advocacy may go, including not using perjured or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Clients and Witnesses are key factors in a legal cause. However the roles they play and how the legal team deals with them during the overall case, are drastically different.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule 1.9 includes the duties to former clients, and after the termination of a client-lawyer relationship, a lawyer has certain continuing duties with respect to confidentiality and conflicts of interest and thus may not represent another client except in conformity with this Rule. (ABA, n.d) The provisions of this Rule are for the protection of former clients and can be waived if the client gives informed consent. This rule is important for lawyers because they still have an obligation of confidentiality to their former clients, and the lawyer cannot reveal anything the former client had said unless the client gives consent to do so. The former client cannot be an example for the new client, and cannot be treated the same as the former client was.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    · Assess the past, present, and future impact that victim rights laws have on court proceedings.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wainwright trial. 2They left and impact felt by everyone who steps into the courtroom today. 3Gideon and Betts push to change the precedent paid off. 4In 1972 the precedent was changed to "require counsel for any defendant who would spend even one day in jail if found guilty" ("Gideon v. Wainwright"). 5As the same law was tried many times, it changed each time it was brought into court. 6During its second run through the court, changing the law was denied, and Betts lost his case. 7According to Roberts, the Fourteenth Amendment "does not compel states to provide counsel to any defendant" ("Betts v. Brady"). 8This case resulted in the decline of Betts, an exceptionally diverse in comparison to Gideon v. Wainwright. 9Even though justices doubted Betts claim, Gideon made them believe in it; resulting in a case that made American…

    • 2093 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963), is a landmark case in United States Supreme Court history. In the case, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that state courts are required by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution to provide lawyers in criminal cases for defendants unable to afford their own attorneys.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Civil law deals with the definition and enforcement of all public and private rights. Whereas criminal law defines and governs the actions that constitute crimes. Criminal law has to do with wrongful actions committed against society for which society demands redress.…

    • 872 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal system of the United States has been overwhelmed by underfunding and excessive caseloads, which has placed a substantial burden on public defenders. Unfortunately, public defenders are the hardest working attorneys and sector of the legal system because they are severely understaffed. Therefore, they are represented by public defenders, which is a granted constitutional right in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright. This case specified that states are required to provide defense attorneys to defendants convicted of a felony or serious crime that cannot provide attorney representation for themselves. According to Brunt (2015), “approximately 80% of the offenders that are charged with a felony are indigent.” This is a relatively large number…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the groundbreaking case Gideon vs. Wainwright we are given a prime example of a Supreme Court case and its impact on federalism. Gideon was accused of felony burglary charges after an eyewitness placed him at the scene of a robbery. Although there was no evidence of him committing the crime, police arrested him and charged him with the theft based solely on an eye witness report. The sequences of events that would follow would change the way states were ordered to provide due process and create a fair and balanced trial for all felony trials.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Next research what role ethics have played in the development of American law and how ethics are used every day by lawyers and paralegals.…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tim Masters Case

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is my job to defend my client and make sure they don’t get punished for a crime they did not commit. Due to the Sixth and Fourteen amendments, every defendant regardless of their ability to pay will have the right to a defense lawyer in most court cases. My client Tim Masters was accused of murdering Peggy Hattrick, in a field close to his house, I have to prove this was not true. All the evidence they has against my client was circumstantial, the prosecution used inadmissible evidence in court to convict Tim Masters. The great news is years later after two denied appeals, my client Tim Masters was exonerated of all charged and set…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    USpreme Court Case Study

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In June 1961, Clarence Gideon was arrested and charged with breaking and entering in Bay Harbor. He was tried in a Florida Circuit Court in August 1961. Gideon stated in Court that he was unable to afford a lawyer and asked the Judge to appoint one for him. The Judge said he was sorry but he could not do that, because the laws of Florida called for appointment of counsel only when a defendant was charged with a capital offense [where the death penalty might be imposed]. When the Florida courts denied his claim, he went to the Supreme Court. In his prison he submitted a petition, handwritten in pencil, arguing that Florida had ignored a rule laid down by the Supreme Court: " that all citizens tried for a felony crime should have aid of counsel." Oral arguments were heard on January 15,1962 and the decision was announced on March 18, 1963.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gideon Vs Wainwright Case

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wainwright case that that everyone that ends up going to court has to be appointed a counsel to help defend themselves. People who can’t afford a counsel gets to get one through the state. They might not be the best person to help you though the case, but at least you get somebody to help you defined yourself during court. No matter how much money you have or don’t have you are required to have somebody no matter if you're the one who finds your counsel or if the supreme court finds the counsel for you. You are required to have one no matter what case it is or who it is against, even if they know you won’t come out free they are still inquired to give you a counsel. The impact that this court case made has help a thousand of people today win or lose cases. Hopefully many times it was helping them because your person you get for your counsel is suppose to make your case better and help you out not make it worse for…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lawyers rely on the members of the team because of the amount of work that has to be accomplished to prepare a case. Law firms have assigned duties and responsibilities for these members and they work collectively to accomplish their goals.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights contains seven clauses that protect the rights of the accused. The amendment assures the accused that “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” (U.S. Const. Amend. 6) One of the most important parts of this amendment is the right to counsel. The right to counsel guarantees the accused is provided with an attorney who is both competent and well – versed in the law. In this day and age, even the defendants that cannot afford counsel are provided with public defenders.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Questions Week 3

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are many advantages and disadvantages when it comes to plea bargaining. Among the advantages the defendants could possibly receive a lighter sentence, they can end up with a lesser charge, and most importantly they move through the criminal justice system a lot faster than if they were to fight a case. As for disadvantages both the defendants and the victims would be affected by plea bargaining. The defendant might not be guilty however he/she knows not enough evidence exists to prove their innocence and so they accept the plea, thus accepting punishment this not deserved. Victims are affected by plea bargaining because they almost always feel cheated as though the accused did not get what he/she deserved and as though justice was not served.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays