Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Adr Clause for Learning Team Charter Paper3344

Satisfactory Essays
387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adr Clause for Learning Team Charter Paper3344
Running head: ADR CLAUSE FOR LEARNING TEAM CHARTER PAPER

ADR Clause for Learning Team Charter Paper
Melissa D. Johnson
University of Phoenix

Business Law – Law 531
Instructor: Shannon Wall

August 10, 2009

ADR Clause for Learning Team Charter Paper

An Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause will be created to identify what disputes are subject to resolution in learning teams. This clause will identify all provisions necessary to enable Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). The process needed in order for the ADR to work effectively.
ADR Clause To be able to handle disputes in the learning teams types of ADR to be used will be arbitration and peer review. The team needs to pick one member to be the leader of the team. This member will be the arbitrator and can make binding or non-binding final decisions for the group. By having a designated arbitrator this will assure things work effectively. If the group doesn’t feel the decision is what is best for the team they may have a peer review to try to come to a better agreement. The following disputes will enable ADR; the dispute to remove someone from the group, the time line for an assignment and who will be responsible for what portion of the assignment. For ADR to be used someone must complain about a specific issue. When they make the complaint the appointed leader/arbitrator may make the decision then allow for a peer decision. If the decision is based on wanting to remove someone from the group due to not attending required times to forum or not turning in assignments in on time. The arbitrator can recommend non-binding recommendation but it must be a peer review decision. If members of the team are in disagreement on the due date of assignments then the arbitrator can make a binding decision on the due date of the assignment. The arbitrator can make the final decision if two people want to do the same portion of an assignment. The arbitrator can make a binding decision if even after a peer review an agreement can not be reached.
Conclusion
Through arbitration and peer review disputes can be handle and the best solution can be achieved. In learning teams those involved should be willing to come to an understanding and handle any disputes amicably.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is ADR? ADR Approaches of Arguments Resolution Negotiation Why Negotiation? Proceedings Implication…

    • 397 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This paper will discuss an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clause that might be used by a Learning Team to resolve a disagreement among members. This paper will identify all provisions and information necessary to enable the ADR to occur and function effectively.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has come to my attention that there has been a state level business dispute which is submitted to ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution). So here, I will discuss about the various methods of ADR. Also, I will suggest/recommend which method of ADR should be used to resolve this case out of court. Further, there will be some discussion on differences between traditional litigation process and ADR.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus Law 531 Week 1

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) over the years has grown in popularity with over 90% of all cases resolved through some form of ADR. The advantages of ADR over trial include such things, as it is less formal and less intimidating. ADR has a more rapid resolution and is less expensive and is normally heard by an arbitrator or mediator. ADR enables parties to address underlying issues and interests. It permits more creative and flexible solutions. Trial by comparison is a more formal process. Traditional litigation requires that a complaint is filed in the court and the plaintiff most respond. This is followed by a pre-trial and a trial in which each party is allowed to present their case and it is settled either by jury or a judge. Trials are also a slower process and require a higher amount of time, more expensive, and as well as stress and emotional disarray. In traditional litigation businesses may get certain documents, testimony, and other evidence, which may not apply to ADR…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law/531 Adr Analysis

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years, litigation has been the one thing in reference to the law that traditionally resolves lawsuits and disputes. There are many facts that need to be considered when one compares or contrasts traditional litigation methods to the nontraditional litigation methods (Alternate Dispute Resolution). Handled outside of litigation in court, ADR is a unique resolution. ADR’s types include “arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation. Conciliation is sometimes included as a fifth category” (Alternate Dispute Resolution Law, 2011).…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. After learning of the disputed issues from each party, the Mediator will prepare a list of disputed issues. If the parties cannot agree about the proper wording of these issues, then both parties’ issues will be presented individually to the Mediator during the ADR process.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to Dictionary.com innovation strategy is a plan made by an organization to encourage advancement in technology or services, usually by investing in research and development activities. An organizations innovation strategy must align with its mission and vision statements, along with aligning with the organizations statements it must also align with outside sources strategies like suppliers and manufacturing. If the process and products strategy do not align this could quickly drive up cost and risk for the organization. There are three pillars of innovation strategy (1) research and development ideation, (2) Life cycles and product innovation strategy, (3) information/idea transference and customer feedback, using these an organization can focus on to help ensure that it is successful.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The definition of ADR is an acronym for alternative dispute resolution. Alternative dispute resolution is a program put in place to help resolve civil cases reach an agreement prior to entering the court. This program helps the court and individuals reach an agreement in a cost effective manner. It is also a requirement in certain counties across the nation in order to avoid costly litigations and give chance to resolution without involving the court.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xcom 285 Wk 6 Checkpoint

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When working in a group, conflicts usually arise and should be dealt with immediately and directly. Ignoring conflict or disagreements will cause the team to be lose focus, become less productive. Most conflicts result from poor communication and misinterpretations. To resolve conflicts, it is important to locate where the break-down in communication happened. By talking through the conflict with the members of the group, and redefining tasks and objectives, the team can resolve these types of issues. To foster good communication within a group every member must listen to each other, work collaboratively to make decisions, adapt to changes and communication styles, assign specific tasks, set clear deadlines and expectations, and conduct follow-up meetings to…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Midterm Review

    • 2002 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Identify the correct statement regarding an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) program attached to the court.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The key issue in the case study is leadership and leadership styles. While it appears that the assistant principal was reassigned due to his appearance, the assistant principal’s appearance reflected a leadership style that the superintendents felt was not in the best interest of the school and chose not to support. In addition, the reassignment of the assistant principal sends a message to the school principal to pay closer attention to the leadership messages of his staff as they are a reflection on the school and its leadership including the principal and superintendents. Clawson (2009) notes that going through the day without really observing or thinking about what’s taking place around them is a common habit that people lapse into. In this case the principal appeared to “go with the flow” in regards to the assistant principal, which in the superintendents minds may have signaled a laissez-faire leadership style toward the assistant principal. Northouse (2009) explains that some have labeled that style “nonleadership.” More, under laissez-faire leadership, subordinates have freedom to do pretty much what they want to do whenever they want to do it. The major effect is that very little is accomplished because people are directionless, find the atmosphere chaotic, and are at a loss to know what to do. So, they tend to do nothing. While in some situations, people will thrive on this direction-less freedom, laissez-faire leadership will be unsuccessful and unproductive (pp. 45). Challenging the status quo is an important leadership skill (Kouzes & Posner, 2007).” In their action, the superintendents were alerting the principal that he was leading a group of people, not just himself, and should have greater concern about what those who are following are doing. Furthermore, people are not only watching the leader. They are watching everyone in the organization, and so should the leader. Consistency between word and deed is not just created…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    learning team charter

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Sarah Dowling- It is our goal as a team to work collaboratively to ensure all members’ thoughts, ideas, and input are shared, discussed, considered, and incorporated into the learning team assignments and projects. It is people’s duty to be accountable for his or her individual portion of the project and to strive to do their personal best. As a group we will seek out opportunities within each other’s strengths to improve our quality of work and assist those team members who may struggle to do so. In the event disagreement occurs between cohorts in regards to any one idea, including but not limited to: substance, quality, or timeline of work submitted, team members will vote to decide if the individual/ idea will continue to work with the group or project. Each member must be committed to the team’s academic achievement and success.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the United States, a traditional litigation refers to the process of bringing, defending and maintaining a lawsuit (Cheeseman, 2010). Traditional litigation goes through a structured process of answer, discovery trial and jury. Whereas the nontraditional litigation process, alternative dispute resolution, known as ADR is a more flexible, less expensive, not as time consuming, and confidential process. There are several forms of alternative dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, negotiation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding and utilizing a judicial referee. Arbitration and mediation are similar to where it is a form of negotiation and a neutral party settles the dispute. Negotiation is where the two parties negotiate to settle the dispute. A mini-trial is a shortened version of a traditional litigation trial. Fact-finding situations call for the parties to employ a third party to investigate the facts to come to a resolution. Lastly, a judicial referee is much like a mini-trial but both parties reserve the right to appeal. Ninety percent of cases are resolved through alternative dispute resolution (Harms, 2011). The next several paragraphs will identify risks associated with traditional litigation and the advantages of the alternative dispute resolution in reducing those risks.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Members should be on time with assignments and responsibilities agreed to. If they are not going to be on time, post a message ASAP stating late or absent. They should check the Learning Team Forum every day for questions and late/absent notices. Lastly, communicate when you are having trouble or struggling and need assistance.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay Paper

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Porter, S. (2003). Managing conflict in learning teams. p. 4. University of Phoenix, Learning Team Toolkit. Retrieved from www.apollolibrary.com/Library/Itt/download/ManagingConflict.pdf.…

    • 1885 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays