Advanced Rocket Nozzles
Gerald Hagemann* DLR, German Aerospace Research Center, Lampoldshausen 74239, Germany Hans Immich† Daimler – Benz AG, Munich 81663, Germany Thong Van Nguyen‡ GenCorp Aerojet, Sacramento, California 95813 and Gennady E. Dumnov§ Keldysh Research Center, Moscow 125438, Russia
Several nozzle concepts that promise a gain in performance over existing conventional nozzles are discussed in this paper. It is shown that signi cant performance gains result from the adaptation of the exhaust ow to the ambient pressure. Special attention is then given to altitude-adaptive nozzle concepts, which have recently received new interest in the space industry. Current research results are presented for dual-bell nozzles and other nozzles with devices for forced ow separation and for plug nozzles with external freestream expansion. In addition, results of former research on nozzles of dual-mode engines such as dual-throat and dual-expander engines and on expansion – de ection nozzles are shown. In general, ow adaptation induces shocks and expansion waves, which result in exit pro les that are quite different from idealized one-dimensional assumptions. Flow phenomena observed in experiments and numerical simulations during different nozzle operations are highlighted, critical design aspects and operation conditions are discussed, and performance characteristics of selected nozzles are presented. The consideration of derived performance characteristics in launcher and trajectory optimization calculations reveal signi cant payload gains at least for some of these advanced nozzle concepts.
Nomenclature
A F h I l m Ç p r ¯ r x, y « amb c cr e geom ref sp t = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = area thrust ight altitude impulse length mass ow rate pressure mass ratio oxidizer/ fuel mixture radius coordinates nozzle area ratio ambient combustion chamber critical exit plane geometrical
References: Manski, D., and Hagemann, G., ‘‘In uence of Rocket Design Parameters on Engine Nozzle Ef ciencies,’’ Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1996, pp. 41 – 47. 2 ‘‘Liquid Rocket Engine Nozzles,’’ NASA Space Vehicle Design Criteria, NASA SP-8120, 1976. 3 Dumnov, G. E., Nikulin, G. Z., and Ponomaryov, N. B., ‘‘Investigation of Advanced Nozzles for Rocket Engines,’’ Space Rocket Engines and Power Plants, Vol. 4, No. 142, NIITP, 1993, pp. 10.12 – 10.18 (in Russian). 4 Nguyen, T. V., and Pieper, J. L., ‘‘Nozzle Flow Separation,’’ Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Propulsion in Space Transportation (Paris, France), 1996. 5 Manski, D., ‘‘Clustered Plug Nozzles for Future European Reusable Rocket Launchers,’’ German Aerospace Research Establishment, 643-81/7, Lampoldshausen, Germany, 1981 (in German ). 6 Horn, M., and Fisher, S., ‘‘Dual-Bell Altitude Compensating Noz1 634 HAGEMANN ET AL. zles,’’ NASA CR-194719, 1994. 7 Immich, H., and Caporicci, M., ‘‘FESTIP Technology Developments in Liquid Rocket Propulsion for Reusable Launch Vehicles,’’ AIAA Paper 96-3113, July 1996. 8 Summer eld, M., Foster, C., and Swan, W., ‘‘Flow Separation in Overexpanded Supersonic Exhaust Nozzles,’’ Jet Propulsion, Sept. 1954, pp. 319 – 321. 9 Schmucker, R., ‘‘Flow Processes in Overexpanding Nozzles of Chemical Rocket Engines,’’ Technical Univ., TB-7,-10,-14, Munich, Germany, 1973 (in German ). 1 0 Hagemann, G., Schley, C.-A., Odintsov, E., and Sobatchkine, A., ‘‘Nozzle Flow eld Analysis with Particular Regard to 3D-Plug-Cluster Con gurations,’’ AIAA Paper 96-2954, July 1996. 1 1 Dumnov, G. E., ‘‘Unsteady Side-Loads Acting on the Nozzle with Developed Separation Zone,’’ AIAA Paper 96-3220, July 1996. 1 2 Nave, L. H., and Coffey, G. A., ‘‘Sea-Level Side-Loads in High Area Ratio Rocket Engines,’’ AIAA Paper 73-1284, July 1973. 1 3 Pekkari, L. O., ‘‘Advanced Nozzles,’’ Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium of Propulsion in Space Transportation (Paris, France), 1996, pp. 10.4 – 10.11. 1 4 Manski, D., Goertz, C., Saßnick, H.-D., Hulka, J. R., Goracke, B. D., and Levack, D. J. H., ‘‘Cycles for Earth-to-Orbit Propulsion,’’ Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1998, pp. 588 – 604. 1 5 Hagemann, G., Kru lle, G., and Hannemann, K., ‘‘Numerical ¨ Flow eld Analysis of the Next Generation Vulcain Nozzle,’’ Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1996, pp. 655 – 661. 1 6 Voinow, A. L., and Melnikov, D. A., ‘‘Performance of Rocket Engine Nozzles with Slot Injection,’’ AIAA Paper 96-3218, July 1996. 1 7 Forster, C., and Cowles, F., ‘‘Experimental Study of Gas Flow Separation in Overexpanded Exhaust Nozzles for Rocket Motors,’’ Jet Propulsion Lab., Progress Rept. 4-103, California Inst. of Technology, Pasadena, PA, May 1949. 1 8 Hagemann, G., and Frey, M., ‘‘A Critical Assessment of DualBell Nozzles,’’ AIAA Paper 97-3299, July 1997. 1 9 Immich, H., and Caporicci, M., ‘‘Status of the FESTIP Rocket Propulsion Technology Program,’’ AIAA Paper 97-3311, July 1997. 2 0 Luke, G., ‘‘Use of Nozzle Trip Rings to Reduce Nozzle Separation Side Force During Staging,’’ AIAA Paper 92-3617, July 1992. 2 1 Chiou, J., and Hung, R., ‘‘A Study of Forced Flow Separation in Rocket Nozzle,’’ Alabama Univ., Final Rept., Huntsville, AL, July 1974. 2 2 Schmucker, R., ‘‘A Procedure for Calculation of Boundary Layer Trip Protuberances in Overexpanded Rocket Nozzles,’’ NASA TM X64843, 1973. 2 3 Goncharov, N., Orlov, V., Rachuk, V., Shostak, A., and Starke, R., ‘‘Reusable Launch Vehicle Propulsion Based on the RD-0120 Engine,’’ AIAA Paper 95-3003, April 1995. 2 4 Clayton, R., and Back, L., ‘‘Thrust Improvement with Ablative Insert Nozzle Extension,’’ Jet Propulsion, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1986, pp. 91 – 93. 2 5 Parsley, R. C., and van Stelle, K. J., ‘‘Altitude Compensating Nozzle Evaluation,’’ AIAA Paper 92-3456, July 1992. 2 6 ‘‘ARPT— Advanced Rocket Propulsion Technology Program, Final Reports Phase 1 and 2,’’ European Space Agency— European Space Research and Technology Centre, The Netherlands, 1996. 2 7 Rommel, T., Hagemann, G., Schley, C.-A., Manski, D., and Krulle, G., ‘‘Plug Nozzle Flow eld Calculations for SSTO Applica¨ tions,’’ Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 13, No. 6, 1997, pp. 629 – 634. 2 8 Tomita, T., Tamura, H., and Takahashi, M., ‘‘An Experimental Evaluation of Plug Nozzle Flow Field,’’ AIAA Paper 96-2632, July 1996. 2 9 Angelino, G., ‘‘Theoretical and Experimental Investigations of the Design and Performance of a Plug Type Nozzle,’’ NASA TN-12, July 1963. 3 0 Lee, C. C., ‘‘Fortran Programs for Plug Nozzle Design,’’ NASA TN R-41, March 1963. 3 1 Nguyen, T. V., Spencer, R. G., and Siebenhaar, A., ‘‘Aerodynamic Performance of a Round-to-Square Nozzle,’’ Proceedings of the 35th Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute, 1997. 3 2 Beheim, M. A., and Boksenbom, A. S., ‘‘Variable Geometry Requirements in Inlets and Exhaust Nozzles for High Mach Number Applications,’’ NASA TM X-52447, 1968. 3 3 Valerino, A. S., Zappa, R. F., and Abdalla, K. L., ‘‘Effects of External Stream on the Performance of Isentropic Plug-Type Nozzles at Mach Numbers of 2.0, 1.8 and 1.5,’’ NASA 2-17-59E, 1969. 3 4 Mercer, C. E., and Salters, L. E., Jr., ‘‘Performance of a Plug Nozzle Having a Concave Central Base with and Without Terminal Fairings at Transonic Speeds,’’ NASA TN D-1804, May 1963. 3 5 Wasko, R. A., ‘‘Performance of Annular Plug and Expansion-Deection Nozzles Including External Flow Effects at Transonic Mach Numbers,’’ NASA TN D-4462, April 1968. 3 6 Smith-Kent, R., Loh, H., and Chwalowski, P., ‘‘Analytical Contouring of Pintle Nozzle Exit Cone Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,’’ AIAA Paper 95-2877, 1995. 3 7 Ewen, R. L., and O‘Brian, C. J., ‘‘Dual-Throat Thruster Results,’’ AIAA Paper 86-1518, 1986. 3 8 Nguyen, T. V., Hyde, J. C., and Ostrander, M. J., ‘‘Aerodynamic Performance Analysis of Dual-Fuel/Dual-Expander Nozzles,’’ AIAA Paper 88-2818, 1988. 3 9 Hagemann, G., Kru lle, G., and Manski, D., ‘‘Dual-Expander En¨ gine Flow eld Simulations,’’ AIAA Paper 95-3135, July 1995. 4 0 Manski, D., Hagemann, G., and Saßnick, H. D., ‘‘Optimization of Dual-Expander Rocket Engines in Single-Stage-to-Orbit Vehicles,’’ Acta Astronautica, Vol. 40, No. 2 – 8, 1997, pp. 151 – 163.