Preview

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Athens

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
771 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Athens
Give me balance, give me equality. In all fairness I believe Athens had the better system of government. I have come to this conclusion that Athens had a better system because anyone could hold office and they had more equal rights as a citizen in the government. Moreover, addressing the 11 million undocumented immigrants, I strongly believe that the United States should allow the immigrants to continuously live in the United States under some conditions. The Athenian Democracy remains a novel and captivating analysis in direct majority rules system where the general population doesn't choose delegates to vote for their sake yet vote on enactment and official bills in their own privilege. The Roman Republic was more represented …show more content…
All the 40,000 Athenian Citizens were able to attend the assembly which was held 40 times a year by a hillside called a Pnyx. All of the male citizens of Athens were eligible to join the Consul of 500; the Consul of 500 were chosen equally from a list of men 30 years and older by a lot. Finally, the members of the Consul of 500 had only 1 year to serve in the Consul and, so every citizens had the chance to be in the Consul of 500. Additionally, the Athens were able to keep power and balance in their government because the citizens were able to lower the power of powerful people. Despite the fact that it was difficult to become a citizen of Athens, it was easy to become a Roman citizen, however, each citizen had limited citizenship rights; the more wealthy and powerful families had more rights and citizenships than others. For example, there was a census every five years to determine the ranks of the native and non-native citizens which also determined how much citizenship they had. For example, the Latini, who were from the Italian peninsula, were able to live and do business in rome but could not have an official …show more content…
I have arrive at this conclusion that Athens had a superior framework due to the fact that anybody could hold office and they had more equivalent rights as a native citizen in the legislature. This was proven true by me because even though it was easier to become a Roman citizen, the citizenship were less fair than that of Athenians. The immigrants may have a hard time earning their citizenship, however it is just fair that they do it. As the 44th President Barack Obama once said “we’re not a nation that kicks out strivers and dreamers who want to earn their piece of the American Dream. We’re a nation that finds a way to welcome them.” Because our nation is the land of the free and the home of the brave, we should allow them to become prideful citizens of our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    #2 Athenian democracy became from an imperialism system is a process of transformation. While Imperialism creation of cities were they controlled trade, military, and commerce, they believed citizens have the right to be part on the decision making of codes and laws creating on this way the assembly system were men owner of property and older than 18 were allow to vote and participate on the assembly. Being a little contradictory because not all Athenians were consider citizens and also excluding gran part of them from the right to vote.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gerousia Dbq

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To be considered a “citizen” in Sparta, you had to be: male, could not be a Helot, or Perioikoi, or a slave. There was an assembly of all male citizens, an elder council of men over 60, the Gerousia, and the Ephors that consisted of 5 magistrates. The Gerousia, was an elite elder council of 30 men and was the Spartan equivalent of the senate. The Gerousia was made up of the wealthier and more conservative men. When one of the 30 seats became available in the Gerousia, it was the assembly who chose the man to fill the Gerousia vacancy. The Ephors were elected each year for one, one-year term by the members of the assembly. The assembly consisted of all male Spartan citizens. Becoming an Ephor was the only way to for non-aristocratic citizens to gain political power. The assembly passed laws and was responsible for making decisions concerning war, but it was the Ephors and the Gerousia that selected which matters would be decided by the assembly and the Ephors and the Gerousia could veto the decisions made by the Assembly so the Ephors and the Gerousia generally monopolized the city-states decisions.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then after 507 BCE, all free men can be selected for public office holders. To be selected for public office holders someone must be selected by Athenian people, must be a male resident of Athens (women, foreigners and slaves, were excluded from the political system), and must be 20 years old or older. To join Athenian Popular Assembly, someone must be an adult male citizen of 20 years and older. He had to meet the Assembly two or three times per month and vote there if he showed up that day. They were paid to attend the assembly.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The ancient Romans had a better system in regards to government and citizenship than the Athenians. Unlike the Athenians, the Romans allowed people living in conquered lands to become citizens with limited rights. Native-born Roman women and children were considered citizens while in Athens, only free, native-born adult males are citizens. The Romans also had a better-organized government system.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Athenian government was the first democracy known to the world. Athens had a government where all of the citizens took part in the decision making. Thus, everyone who qualified as a citizen could participate and did not have to be an elected representative. For one to be considered a citizen they first had to be born in Athens and had to be free. Next, once turned eighteen years of age he had to have at least two years of military training then serve in the navy or army. After he has served he could then vote. After the age of thirty he could be considered for council. The women of Athens were also considered to be citizen however they did not posses any political power. The Athenian democracy had three main branches which were the assembly, the council, and the jurymen. The assembly had the reasonability of making the policies for Athens. The assembly could be considered the legislative branch and it was made of eligible Athenian citizens. The council enforced administrative matters and the policies. They were also in control of the military and finances. The council was made of five hundred citizens and could be considered the executive branch. The jury men had the important yet tedious job of resolving disputes of the people. There were six thousand jurymen to manage…

    • 606 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the past and present, human beings have had a natural tendency to believe they are better than average. The people of Athens were certainly no exception. They wanted to believe that they were the best humanity had to offer. The Athenians valued freedom and for every man to fulfill his own life and desires in peace. They claimed their sense of independence was balanced out through the fact that everyone upheld fair and just laws. They prided themselves on not sacrificing their individual identities (as the Spartans did) for the sake of military discipline and superiority. They ultimately held themselves as the pinnacle of versatility, a city full of people who were jack-of-all-trades. But the reality fell quite short of the perception.…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens Citizenship Dbq

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    5. How could you use this document to argue that Athens had a better system of citizenship than Rome?…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our first speaker praised our wondrous military. I will be continuing my team's argument that Athens is far superior to Sparta by examining the mindset of the Athenian government. To prove/support my belief that the Athenian government was superior to that of Sparta, I will be arguing 2 major points. Firstly, that the government in Athens was fairer than theirs and secondly, that the system of governing was stronger than theirs.…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like Mesopotamia, Athens might be well known for their system of law and order. Athens saw the beginning of democracy and government like we know it today. In Athens, government now included citizens, not just representatives like in previous systems. For one of the first times in history, regular citizens could play key roles in how their community and government was…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Athens Vs Sparta Essay

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Did you know that Spartans were so harsh and strict, they banished citizens that were overweight! Spartans were hostile and stern, which made them very powerful. They were solitary people that were simple but strong. Also, they were very protective, and fearful of other city-states trying to weaken the government through new ideas. On the other hand, Athenians were cultured and artistic people. They had creative minds, and loved to socialize with other city-states to spread new ideas. Athenians and Spartans had many diversities and differences, thus causing the Peloponnesian War that had tragic effects which impacted Greece for many years.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One thing that the ancient Greek affected western civilization is politics. It was the Greeks who developed a democracy, they were the very first. Pericles stated that he wanted all citizens to have an equal opportunity to serve the public. In both the US democracy and the Greeks democracy, political privilege can be use by citizens. (Doc.3). An example of a political privilege can be use by citizens in Greek was that laws were voted upon and to able to nominate by the assembly of all citizens. In the US when citizens are 18 and older they are granted the right to vote. In the US most of the democratic system that the government uses is either identical or very similar to the Ancient Greek system.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Citizenship Dbq

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Becoming a citizen of Athens was much harder than Rome. A lot of Rome’s success came from their acceptance of other people coming in into their empire and contributing in any way possible to the great Roman Empire. Athens, on the other hand, didn't really allow other people to become citizens and contribute to their society. On Document A it states that only free, native-born adult males were able to be citizens of Athens. In Rome free, native-born adult males, free, native-born adult females, free, native-born male children, female children and sons of freed slaves could have been citizens.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are reasons why many of history’s greatest empires have tended to be either oligarchic or monarchial in nature. In observing the development of two of the ancient world’s most prominent models of representative government, the Athenian democracy and the Roman Republic, it can be concluded that when coupled with the political, economic, and social changes that come with expansion, the complications inherent with systems with democratic design prove incapable of running an empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman citizenship, republican system, and social standings are overall better than the Athens systems because Roman citizenship requirements gave more freedom towards their people. Although a lot of the Roman society is based on social class which can lead to biased towards those of different “rankings”, the Romans conducted census to control the benefits and privileges of citizenship. According to Claudius, in Document C, Athens had conquered aliens (conquered people or foreigners) and made citizenship difficult for aliens to still be in the same society. However, Romans gave those who were conquered more freedom to rejoin the society, treating their people as a republican system. Roman citizenship requirements allowed much of their people to become citizens, providing their citizens with more freedom than the Athenian system.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Sparta, as a girl I could help with farming. I don’t like slavery, but as a Spartan I could support the conquering of other people to become slaves. The slaves did the hard work and were treated harshly, but if they worked hard enough they could buy their freedom. In Athens, the slaves could have lots of jobs like tutors, but could never be free. Also in Athens they used the sea harbors to trade to make money. Athenians’ land was not that good, so they could not farm as much. Athens had huge marketplaces called Agora, where they used coins to trade. Spartans like life to be simpler. They did not like to trade. They made their money from conquering people and farming. In Sparta the government was ruled by two kings and twenty-eight other men for their entire lives. They were nobles with power to stop and make laws. I like the fact you know who is in charge. In Athens, citizens were randomly chosen to serve for one year. The citizens could suggest laws. I don’t think I would like to serve in government. I rather do what I want to do. Also in Athens everyone has to vote on each…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays