First of all, people can see wild, beautiful, exotic animals. They can see how animals live and behave. Secondly, animals have good life conditions in zoos. They do not starve because they have food and water. People take care of animals. Moreover, animals are safe. People do not kill them. Animals live as close to the natural habitat as possible. For instance, water and other natural barrieres are used to separate animals from each other and from the visitors.
On the other hand, keeping animals in zoos is harmful for them. The animals are forced to live in a unnatural habitat. There is not enough living space in the zoos, when often makes animals unhappy and restless. It is also true that, some animals do not proliferate in zoos. Secondly, animlas should live in freedom, because it is their natural habitat. Moreover, animals in the zoos live under stress. The worst thing is that animals in the zoos will never be able to exsist in their natural habitat alone. They have will not any chance to survive.
In conclusion, it seems that keeping wild animals in zoos is more benefical than harmful. I think that it is profitable for all animals, because they have good protection. They can feel safe.
Should animals be kept in zoos? It is hard to decide for me whether it is good or bad. Keeping animals in zoos does indeed have a lot of advantages.
Firstly, animals are provided with food and water. They must not worry about it. In zoos, the endangered species are protected. If it weren't for zoos, the great panda-one of the endangered species would be extinct now. Animals have a chance to breed freely.
In addition people have a chance to see various animals of the world. Also, people get to know a lot about life of animals.
On the other hand keeping animals in zoos is a disadvantage. Animals live in cages. After living