Preview

Advantages Of Mandatory Sentencing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
888 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages Of Mandatory Sentencing
Mandatory Sentencing

“A mandatory sentence is a court decision setting where judicial discretion is limited by law. Typically, people convicted of certain crimes must be punished with at least a minimum number of years in prison.” – Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia

The difference between normal and mandatory sentencing is the process that this happens in as normal sentencing sets a range of penalties, which allows the judge and the magistrates to see out the sentence according to the circumstances of the offence and the offender. So far Western Australia, NSW and Queensland have Mandatory sentencing but the northern territory has abolished mandatory sentencing.

The NSW government introduced Mandatory sentencing laws as a part of a range
…show more content…
This is a response to the drive by shootings involving bikie gangs in Western Sydney. The Government was considering introducing five year minimum mandatory sentencing for these crimes.

The objectives of this new law of mandatory sentencing for the other new law of one punch offences under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol is to lower the rate of “king hits” or “Coward Punches”. This subject of “coward punches” is being spread around the media and Sydney is getting a bad name for drug and alcohol related offences.

So the Australian government was witnessing all these intoxicated people committing the “coward punch” which was leading to a lot of innocence young people to suffer blunt force trauma to the head and get knocked unconscious, which would lead to the victim to hit their head on the pavement and/or hard surface. This affected them very badly and caused their brain to start swelling and a lot of these “coward punch” would unfortunately die. So the government introduced the mandatory sentencing to target these offences and try to reduce the amount of “coward punch”
…show more content…
1. A proposed new law, or changed law, is discussed in cabinet. Often, people in Australia put pressure on the government to change something. A decision is then made on what to do.
2. If the government decides to proceed, government lawyers are asked to draft a bill. A bill is basically a “first draft” of an act of parliament.
3. Copies of the given to all members of the House of Representatives. The members read the material in their own time. This is known as the “first reading”
4. The bill goes through a “second reading”. During this stage, the responsible minister (for example, the minister for immigration if the bill is to do with migrants) describes the main purpose and likely benefits of the bill. Speakers form the government and opposition say what they think about it. Debates may take weeks. Then there us a vote. If the majority vote in favour, the bill moves to the next stage.
5. The bill is debated again, this time bit by bit. This stage is known as the committee stage, as the debate occurs in parliamentary committees. Changes to the bill may be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Moviegoers and online game players often notice products from a part of the script or scene. Companies pay for this privilege: They agree to a payment scheme in return for the marketing benefits that come as a result of a Hollywood star using their product. The same is true of video games, where everyday players navigate through a world populated with products they can find in their local store.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 23 - Law - P7

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An act of parliament creates a new law or changes an existing law. An act is a bill approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords and agreed to by the monarch who is in reign. Once implemented an act is law and applies to the UK as a whole or to specific areas of the country.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSW LIQUOR LAWS

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe this legislation is essential for reducing the amount of intoxicated, alcohol-fuelled violence, which occurs on Sydney streets. The…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pre-legislation stage consists of someone coming up with an idea for a bill which is presented to the cabinet, they must approve the principles of the bill for it to reach the next stage which is the drafting of the bill. This part consists of Parliamentary counsel drafting the bill. This is a government body of trained lawyers which job is to draft a bill whilst making sure that it is not contradicting to current legislation or the constitution. When a formal and legitimate bill is drafted it can then be initiated into the originating house. This involves the bill being tabled for the first reading along with a notification to the house of new proposal.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kornhauser, R. 2016. “The effectiveness of Australia’s drug courts”. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. doi: 10.1177/0004865816673412…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As substantiated by amendments to Crimes Act 1900, Bail Act 1989 and the Firearm Act 1989 the effectiveness of Law reform in NSW is established in the scope of domestic violence. This reflects the changing social standards and sense of public morality as to the role and protection of women and children in society.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law unit 2

    • 575 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First reading- this is when all the members of the parliament and the public get together in a court and you present your bill to all of them.…

    • 575 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When debating MPs are able to express their views to influence policy in the debates on current events and actions. Every proposed piece of legislation must be debated at least twice, this is good as the policies may need amendments applied to them, or they may just be policies that would not be in the interest of most of the country. The MPs are able to subject bills to scrutiny, especially if they have a major impact on their constituency; this is to their advantage, as the policies may not go into action and completely discarded. The ministers are forced to present all policies to the House of Commons before any public announcements are to be made.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -if ONE senator disagrees, then there are no rules for debate (other than general parliament procedure…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    House committees are responsible for most of the work involved in the creation of new laws. After a bill is introduced in the House, it is referred to a committee. The committee studies the bill and may hold public hearings on it or suggest amendments. If the bill has the support of a majority of committee members, it is reported to the House, which then debates it and votes on it. The Committee on…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Australia has nine sentencing jurisdictions with each jurisdiction possessing its own criminal justice system. Federal, state and territory criminal legislation generally specify offences with a prescribed maximum penalty which allows a court to determine an appropriate punishment in the particular circumstances of that case. In recent years, the Australian Parliament has increased proclaimed power over sentencing, setting a fixed or consistent penalty for committing a certain offence. This upsurge suggests that there is a public desire for tougher sentencing laws and dissatisfaction in the community with the traditional sentencing system where courts have had a broad discretion to punish offenders. The results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing shows that the majority of respondents expressed high levels of dissatisfaction and were displeased with sentences that are imposed by the courts.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's War of Independence was a political and military struggle among the thirteen American colonies and England. Since the British defeated the French and their Indian allies in the French and Indian War, the result was British control over much of North America. This was had cost England a great deal of money and Parliament decided it was time for the colonies to pay a share for their own defense. The movement to resist the new imperial policies, a movement for which many people would die for, was thus at the same time democratic and conservative. It was a movement to conserve liberties Americans believe they already possessed. While it would be hard to point to any one event that singularly led to the revolution, there is no doubt that…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 13 p6

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Firstly a brief version of the proposed bill is read out in the chamber and then is made available to members of parliament such as the house of lords and the house of commons.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mandatory minimum sentences are polices that require judges or juries to sentence convicted criminals to a minimum sentence irrespective of possible mitigating circumstances. Mandatory minimum sentences became increasingly popular as a result of the drug war, when both the federal government as well as states elected to enact mandatory minimum sentences for non-violent drug offenders. California’s Three Strikes law was one of the most publicized of these laws. It required a mandatory 25-year to life sentence for individuals convicted of three felonies. Though the stated intent of the law was to remove violent offenders from the streets, the actual result was that many individuals with non-violent offences, including burglary, drug possession…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays