Cochlear implants characterize progress and globalization because they are a technology which attempts to “cure” deafness. The study by Wheeler, Archbold, Gregory, Skipp (2007) concludes “Cochlear implantation is a relatively new procedure, which has already had significant impact on the lives of many profoundly deaf children and adults, in providing useful hearing to those unable to benefit significantly from hearing aids”. The Cochlear implant holds effect in how I interact with society, with out the Cochlear implant I would be profoundly deaf and there for feel too inadequate to socialize among others. The CI has also helped others to understand what…
I firmly believe that the cochlear implant operation should be able to be performed on young children even though they cannot give consent. After watching Sound and Fury multiple times, I can see why some people would not want themselves or their children to receive cochlear implants. They have a fear that they would abandon the deaf culture and they would lose their deaf identity. However, this movie has also given me more insight on the advantages of receiving a cochlear implant and how important it is to receive it at a young age. In the movie, one of the twins receives the cochlear implant as an infant whereas the main character, Heather, does not receive it until around nine years old. After watching the movie, I then watched a TED talk that Heather presented when she was in her twenties. Although she was able to talk and you could understand the majority of what she was saying, her speech would have been much…
The disadvantage of Dr. Ruiz waiting until the follow up to inform the patient about the error and the fact that the patient needs more surgery runs the risk of compromising the physician and patient relationship. That relationship is built on trust. Patients trust that the physician is skillful, knowledgeable, and trustworthy. Also, the patient may become angry, and angry enough to initiate a lawsuit. Even worse, the patient may not trust any medical professionals and choose not to seek medical attention for other conditions. Also, the patient could have become more ill from the lack of treatment. The only advantage of waiting for the follow-up to discuss more surgery is that the patient may have suffered more harm undergoing anesthesia for a longer period of time. This is also a disadvantage of returning the patient back to surgery once the mistake was discovered, during the same event. The advantage of returning the patient to surgery is that it strengthens the physician and patient relationship. The physician recognized the error and desired to fix the error, which may appear noble in the eyes of the patient.…
As one would expect, struggles to preserve sign language, drive automobiles, obtain employment in private and government sectors, access information, recognize American Sign Language, be treated equally, and preserve the right to determine their own destiny strengthened the cohesiveness of the Deaf community over the years. At the same time, the growing diversity within the Deaf community no longer provided consensus or universal views on issues related to educational placements and technological advancements such as cochlear implantation. It is too early to discuss these issues from a historical standpoint,…
A cochlear implant is a surgically implanted device which helps to bypass problems of the inner ear and the cochlea. Almost everyone who had received cochlear implants is able to hear some amount of sound. Children who have received the implants are able to hear normal speech levels at 30 or 40 decibels according to a research done by Dr. Bruce Gantz of the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. It is more successful among individuals with complete hearing loss and has not benefitted form hearing aids.…
Initially a Deaf child’s journey begins with family and starts at birth but it’s not till the deafness is detected that important decisions start to be made. Interactions with the child are important as are the ways the child is interacted with. Choices have to be made by the family that will result in how a child is educated and socialized. These most important family influences can greatly help in positive development of the child or the lack of it. Some decisions that have substantial impact are: How will the child be educated? The choice between institutional and hearing schools. Should we opt for cochlear implants? These are just a couple many important decisions and choices that are made by the parents or caregivers.…
The biggest controversy of the deaf community has been the topic of a cochlear implant. The debate is centered around the expense, risk and idea of the implants causing deaf people to distance themselves from the deaf community rather than emerging themselves. This is due to the cochlear implants ability to provide a sense of sound to the deaf individual. It is only used when a hearing aid is not strong enough to provide adequate function. The cochlear implant involves a lot of time to consider the procedure because of cost, risk, and being a part of the deaf community. In order to make a decision of getting a cochlear implant one must have background knowledge on how a cochlear works, hearing vs. deaf, benefits, risk and cost.…
The diagnosis process of a hearing loss often begins with the Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS). Hearing loss is considered one of the most common disabilities in the United States (Jackson, Traub, & Turnbull, 2008). Before the UNHS was widely implemented in 1990s, physicians, medical personnel, and teachers were responsible for detecting hearing loss through a long referral process (Fitzpatrick et al., 2008). Now, the UNHS helps identify children with hearing loss as infants to improve their learning and communication outcomes (Fitzpatrick, Angus, Durieuz-Smith, Graham, & Coyle, 2008). After children are screened, follow-up assessments are given and early intervention services are provided to the child (Fitzpatrick…
The first step to receiving a cochlear implant is evaluation. Before any surgery is done on the patient, they will study them and be sure that cochlear implants are the best choice for not only the patient, but for the family as well. The family of the patient has to be willing to communicate with the child and help them either work on or establish language and speech skills (Cochlear Implants for Kids.)…
In comparison, hearing people speak to communicate. Cochlear implants are controversial amongst the deaf community because they fear that the use of cochlear implants will threaten their established culture and sign language. DEAF SCHOLARThey fear a deaf child with an implant may choose to leave the deaf culture because they are ashamed of their true identity. This may inevitably cause low self-esteem and lack of self-acceptance. The deaf believe cochlear implantation exploits the idea that being deaf is wrong or a disability that needs to be “fixed,” which decreases their potential of living life to its highest potential. Deaf scholar This is a common view of hearing culture, but the deaf community disagrees. A critical aspect of the cochlear implant debate has to do with the concept of deafness and at how hearing people perceive those who are deaf. (Deaf scholar) The deaf community does not think that they have a disability to be cured. They fully embrace their inability to hear and they stress the importance of accepting yourself. DEAF SCHOLAR Those who are hearing assume that spoken language is essential, yet they fail to see the importance of ASL and to understand the needs of the deaf community kind of from perspective of deaf PERSPECTIVE OF DEAF The deaf community also fears cochlear implants will cause separation. When deaf children have the implant, they will likely be exposed to only spoken language and will never learn ASL. FROM DEAEF SCHOLAR Because a child with a cochlear implant may want to speak more often than use ASL, it could potential create a language barrier between the child and the parents. Cochlear implants separate deaf people from deaf culture because they have the ability to hear, whereas their peers do not. Because of this, the deaf community may reject the child as a part of their community. The hearing…
Many members of the deaf community are content with their unique culture and do not regard deafness as a disorder or something that needs to be cured. Within the deaf community, particular scorn is reserved for the practice of placing cochlear implants in young children. The National Association of the Deaf, maintains that there is no evidence that deaf children who receive implants early are better able to acquire English or have greater educational success than other deaf children.…
It has both a strong positive support and a strong negative support. The cochlear implant was invented to help deaf people who became deaf later in life, but their use for deaf children became controversial. Some reasons why deaf people have a negative view on the cochlear implant are because of the following: one are the effectiveness and risks of the implant. Now although it has a 90 to 95percebt of hearing and language improvement the ricks are very dangerous. Inserting a cochlear implant destroys any residual hearing in the operated ear. Although the standard surgical risks of a cochlear implant are all quite rare. They include: bleeding, infection, device malfunction, facial nerve weakness, ringing in the ear, dizziness, and poor hearing result. One long term risk of a cochlear implant is meningitis which is an infection of the fluid around the brain. People don’t like cochlear implants because there is the conflict between those who view deafness as a physical impairment and those whose it as a valued part of cultural identity. So the deaf community worries that if people get the cochlear implant they will lose touch with their deaf culture. They feel as though they will want to be hearing so they will try so hard to be hearing and live like a hearing person not paying attention to their true deaf side. They also worry that since deaf people want to be hearing so much, hearing people won’t…
As a result of aging, most of the elderly population, 60 years of age, have a condition referred to as presbycusis, otherwise known as age-related hearing loss (Lassaletta, Calvino, Snchez-Cuadrado, Prez-Mora, and Gaviln, 2015). Expected to increase, presbycusis is the second most common cause of disability in elders (Cuadrado et al., 2013). Thus, cochlear implants (CIs) have become a topic to discuss to the elderly population with sensorineural hearing loss of at least 70 dB, when hearing aids no longer benefit the patient’s speech discrimination. Although, CIs are beneficial for elderly patients, there are several controversial issues regarding implanting this particular population due to their duration of hearing loss, decreased physical and cognitive capabilities, and decreased communication might influence the outcomes (Cuadrado et al., 2013). Additionally, risks and benefits of CIs in the elderly population are considered due to the intake of anesthesia taken for the procedure (Cuadrado et al, 2013).…
One the one hand, cochlear implants appear to be a threat to Deaf culture and potentially undermines the lives of Deaf persons, as the procedure is conducted with the intent to spare children from the despair of being deaf. This is an issue because Deaf persons cherish their deafness and actually prefer to be deaf. Moreover, labeling deafness as a disability, a word sometimes associated with a potent stigma, promotes the idea that those experiencing deafness do not have meaningful lives. On the other hand, society is engineered for the hearing population, as the majority of persons have an intact hearing mechanism. To be deaf in this society results in costly accommodations and numerous disadvantages. In addition, some argue that it is not appropriate for the Deaf community to expect hearing parents of deaf children to refrain from getting cochlear implants solely for the purpose of preserving Deaf culture. Ultimately, it is solely the decision of parents to decide if their deaf child should undergo cochlear implantation, and I feel that they are not obligated to ensure that Deaf culture lives…
The parent can learn sign language with the child and send them to an all deaf school. They could decide for the cochlear implant surgery and let them attend a public school with no education on sign language or Deaf culture. Of course a parent can also choose to let their child have a mixture of these things. For example they could send their kid to a deaf school with a cochlear implant and have them learn sign language as well. They could also do the same in a hearing school and have them learn sign language.…