Preview

Adverse Posession Statute

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Adverse Posession Statute
Melissa Mirelez
PA 300
Unit 1 Assignment

Part One
The adverse possession statute is found at §5/13-101 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure. (735 ILCS 5/13-101) (from Ch. 110, par. 13-101) Sec. 13-101. Twenty years - Recovery of land. No person shall commence an action for the recovery of lands, nor make an entry thereon, unless within 20 years after the right to bring such action or make such entry first accrued, or within 20 years after he, she or those from, by, or under whom he or she claims, have acquired title or possession of the premises, except as provided in Sections 13-102 through 13-122 of this Act.
(Source: P.A. 82-280.)
To establish title under the adverse possession doctrine in Illinois, a person must show several elements with proof.
A party must prove that his or her possession of land was:
(1) continuous,
(2) hostile
(3) actual,
(4) open, notorious and exclusive, and
(5) under claim of title inconsistent with that of the true owner for a period of 20 years. All five of these elements must have existed during the full 20- year period before the doctrine will apply.
Chapter 735 Illinois Civil Procedure. Illinois General Assembly. Retrieved on may 21, 2013, from; http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/documents/073500050K13-101.htm
Part Two
The case I found in Illinois that pertains to the adverse possession statute can be found under Sanders. v. Williams 2013 IL App (5th) 110573-U - State of Illinois. http://www.state.il.us/court/R23_Orders/AppellateCourt/2013/5thDistrict/5110573_R23.pdf Part Three
Facts
Plaintiff, Sally Sanders filed a complaint in the circuit court of Williams County against defendant, Fred Williams. Sanders claimed that Williams trespassed on a strip of land where their properties meet. Williams counterclaimed to allege adverse possession. After a bench trial, the defendant was given a judgment in favor of him. The plaintiff filed an appeal based on the fact that the defendant did

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This appeal is based on a previous trial for the stop of payments due to in an abrupt change in rent prices, and was brought to the Florida district court of appeals by Alan and Nancy Garrett, the new owners of a mobile home park. They appeal a final judgment in favor of forty-six tenants from the mobile home park who refused to perform payment. The couple asked for declaratory and injunctive relief and damages coming from the agreements for the mobile home lots.…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Illinois statute authorizing transfer of property into tenancy by the entirety states as follows:…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Nolans requested that the Naabs remove the garage from their property. When the Naabs refused, a lawsuit ensued. Who Wins?? (Adverse Possession)…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As to paragraph 2 and 3, it is hereby admitted in part. One of Anheuser Busch’s trucks was driven in Ford County, Paxton, Illinois, which passed a motorcycle driven by the Plaintiff.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    PA110 Complaint Form 1

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois.…

    • 707 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PA205

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    An after-acquired domicile is one where a person changes their domicile after the events in question are over. Defendants may argue that Employee gained an after-acquired domicile when she to West Kansas for medical treatment. However, this Court should not credit this after-acquired domicile. The California Supreme Court has held that after-acquired domiciles should always be ignored by courts. This Court should adopt that approach. A per se rule ensures both predictability and consistency. It also prevents the possibility of law shopping. Therefore, this Court should adopt a rule that always ignores after-acquired domiciles. If this Court does so, then East Kansas has an interest in apply its rule to ensure adequate compensation for…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If State law requires a different retention period, the more stringent between federal and state must be followed. AHIMA states 10 years retention time frame.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stephen assignment draft

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages

    rectify substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another”, Ill. Sup. Ct. R.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Siegligence Case Study

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this negligence case brought by a former tenant Rosetta Taylor, the Defendants Vista Views Leasing Properties Inc., d/b/a Park Bluff Apartments move for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim of negligence and breach of duty. The defendants move for summary judgment based on an affirmative pleading of the defense of the statute of limitations. Tex. R. Civ. P. 94; Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a) (West 2002). Defendants contend that the statute of limitations has run and bars any and all claims. Plaintiff contends that the statute of limitations has not run due to misnomer and misidentification that the statute of limitations is tolled and does not apply as any amended petition relates back to the date of the original petition. Defendant…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    8) Supreme Court of Missouri Decision Kraemer, under the support of the association, filed for an injunction preventing Shelley from gaining access to the property because of the pre-existing restrictive covenant…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Justin King Answer

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Haselton, P. J. (2002, October 16). Oregon Judicial Department Appellate Court Opinions. Retrieved from http://www.publications.ojd.state.or.us/docs/A108593.htm…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The decisions made by Supreme Court chief justice John Marshall have had a major influence on today's Judiciary System. One of his major decisions was in the case Marbury v. Madison, in which he set the precedent of judicial review. Another major decision is in the case McCulloch v. Maryland, in this case Marshall ruled that Congress possesses certain implied powers. Other major decisions made by Marshall were in the cases Dartmouth College v. Woodward, Gibbons v. Ogden, in which Marshall defined national power over interstate commerce, and Cherokee Nation v. State of Georgia.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays