AED 200
February 3, 2013
Maria Cuba
Student Locker Searches without Permission Today across America there are drugs being sold at school, students have brought weapons to school. There have been too many school shootings and too many lives lost. It is the schools right to search any locker, student and any student property without a search warrant, but the school must have reasonable grounds for believing that a student is in possession of evidence of a violation of a law or school rule (Pearson Education, Inc, 2005, p. 227). This brings up questions about the Fourth Amendment which protects individuals from search without a court ordered warrant. This does pertain to schools and student but if the school has reasonable cause they may search the students’ property and it will be held in court. As a teacher, it is my responsibility to report any suspicious behavior or anything that I have heard to the Principal. From there the Principal will decide what course of action is going to take place. I have an obligation to my other students to keep them safe and this means turning a student in for acts that violate school rules or the law. If I had to conduct a search of one of my students I would do it while class was in session with another teacher present and the student. I do not think searching a locker when other students can witness will be good for anyone. This is an issue between the school and the student. I think it is the students’ right to be present for the search, so they know and see what they did or did not find, also to make sure that everything is put back and accounted for. There have been drugs brought to school, weapons, this is a place that is supposed to feel safe, an environment that is supposed to help support our students and help them grow up and educate them. If students do not feel safe their school work is going to suffer. If random searches are necessary and help the students to have a piece of mind, then I am all for this. Not everyone or every student is going to agree but too many lines have been crossed and if the student doesn’t have anything to hide then it should be fine. Lockers are technically school property. They are there for convenience. The schools allow the students to store their items in the lockers and if something suspicious is reported then I feel the school has every right to check. If a student brings in drugs, weapons or other items that are illegal or banned from school then I feel as the student has given up their right. They know it’s wrong or illegal but they did it anyway. Students knowing that the school can and will do locker searches are less likely to bring such items into the school for fear of getting caught. While I was a senior in high school we had the police come in with dogs and search the lockers. The dogs smelled several lockers that contained marijuana and other drugs. This was the first time in my education that this happened. My locker was searched because I was right next to one of the students who had drugs in his locker. I had stopped using my locker so I could avoid this group of kids. I ended up sharing a locker with a friend. We were shocked but not surprised this happened to these certain students. Drugs were becoming an issue at the school. There were several parents that were outraged because they felt it was a violation to privacy and what next; the school would be doing cavity searches to all the students. I thought that was bit unrealistic. I was glad this finally happened. These students made me very uncomfortable and I didn’t feel safe with them around. I hated having any classes with some of them. I had nothing to hide and I didn’t think it mattered most of us only had some books, old food containers and a jacket or some other items. Five students that day were suspended that day and two were arrested because they were already on probation. It was scary because once the students came back, would they be really mad, how would they react? I remember our teacher talking to us about what happened and he wanted our view on it. Most of the students were for it, we knew what was going on and this group of kids we didn’t feel safe around. Mostly we were surprised it didn’t happen sooner. Our teacher told us that while school is in session, we are his and every other teachers’ responsibility. He is responsible for teaching us and keeping us safe. If that means that he needs to turn in a student for doing something wrong then he would do it again. With the school shootings and everything else that has been happening in schools I feel that randomly searching lockers is the least of our problems. Our children deserve to go to school and be safe. They deserve to have the best education we can offer and sometimes students don’t always make the best decisions. As teachers we need to be there to guide them along and help them grow to become well rounded and productive members of society.
Reference Pearson Education, Inc. (2005). Introduction to the Foundations of American Education, Thirteenth Edition, Retrieved from University of Phoenix, AED 200.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
After this discovery he continued to search the purse thoroughly and found some marijuana, a pipe, plastic bags, money, an index card containing a list of students who owed TLO money, and two letters that signaled her in marijuana dealing. So everything being discovered now will be used against her in court. After the discovering of these items in TLO purse she was taken to the Juvenile Court and received delinquency charges which,in court TLO tried to say that her 4th Amendment was violated but the court said the search conducted by the Vice Principal was reasonable because TLO was a delinquent. On the contrary The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court came to the conclusion that there was a Fourth Amendment violation. The New Jersey Supreme Court said, holding that the search of the purse was unreasonable. She was sentenced to one year probation and brought up on charges by the local authorities. Though the Supreme Court did not say that the Fourth Amendment did not apply to students. The Fourth Amendment states that a search and seizure cannot be lawfully conducted without a warrant or probable cause. However, in a school setting, a search is considered to be reasonable and within the constraints of the Fourth Amendment if there is reasonable suspicion…
- 497 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
T.L.O. is a case that argued the right to privacy rights at school. The result of this case was that students belongings can be searched but not for no good reason. Furthermore, the case started when a fourteen year old student at Piscataway High School in New Jersey was caught smoking in a bathroom by a teacher. Once the student was caught her purse was then searched by the teacher. Found in the purse was a pack of cigarettes, rolling papers, and a small amount of marijuana. Because of the belongings discovered by the teacher, police were called in and the fourteen year old student openly admitted to selling drugs on school property. Furthermore, during her trial she was found guilty and was put on probation. However, fourteen year old, Terry argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the fourth amendment, “unreasonable searches and seizures.” This case is a great example of a landmark case because it started the beginning of future decisions regarding searches and seizures at…
- 639 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Fourth Amendment states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”. But, does this Amendment apply to students in the public school systems?…
- 726 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In order to have reasonable suspicion, school administrators must have sufficient knowledge to believe that a crime has been or is about to be committed. This differs from the grounds of probable cause because the officers must have sufficient and accurate facts to believe that a crime has been or is about to be committed. Reasonable suspicion for school administrators could be as simple as a rumor. Once that rumor is brought to attention, administration is expected to perform an investigation and if a search and seizure is required of them, it must be a search relative to the scope of the issue at hand. For example, a search of a student’s locker or car on school property with the belief that there may be drugs would be a sufficient search where as a strip search of the student’s body would be considered intrusive. The facts of the two cases, Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, clearly portray the difference between the two…
- 897 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The authors also state that suspicionless searches teach students that rights do not matter. I disagree with the author's point of view on overstating the dangers of drugs in schools. I believe it is a growing concern in our public school system. How do we expect a student to concentrate in class if he is stoned all the time? I think instituting random school searches should be on a case by case basis by school district. Blankenau and Leeper's article do not raise any issues of escalating school violence. Are weapons growing concerns like drugs are? The authors surveyed responses of Nebraska High School Principles to obtain data on how effective their drug polices have been. The article in this book does not allow me to make any comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their field study because they did not go in depth of what the study…
- 4872 Words
- 20 Pages
Good Essays -
First and foremost, irregular locker searches help to reduce violence and drug use in schools. Randomized locker searches help to find any weapons or drugs being hidden by student in lockers. THe searches can help to save lives, if there is a weapon found. If it is suspected that the student id breaking a law, or even school rule, a locker search may be carried out to see if the allegations are true.…
- 245 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
- a school official may properly conduct a search of student’s person if the official has a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed or reasonable cause to believe that the search is necessary to maintain school discipline or enforce school policies.”…
- 361 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
• a search of a student by a teacher or other school official will be "justifie…
- 1169 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…
- 713 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
1.Teachers and administrators in many American schools are now authorized to conduct random inspections of students' lockers and backpacks. Explain why you support or oppose this practice.…
- 141 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The purpose of this paper is assess the limits search and seizure in public schools, apply specific ruling, analyze the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case and explain, recommend changes to existing (specific) laws to create a fairer educational setting in terms of search and seizure and peer review. School officials are responsible for providing a safe and orderly school environment. The officials are required to address disrupting or unsafe behavior that violate school policy and rules. It may require searching of students and their belongings. Dealing with disrupted behavior is a difficult situation that requires decision-making on when, where and how to conduct a search and seizure. My assess limit search and seizure is on hunch or just general search. School officials must have reasonable or proper cause to search.…
- 2085 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The lockers have been given to the students expecting them to take care of it and being responsible over it. What is the need to go through it? I have been given a locker since sixth grade and never once has a teacher much less a principle gone through my locker. If they were to go through my locker it would make me feel like i'm a suspect for something I have no connection with.On our way into school each day student’s book bags are checked each day. There have even been instances in which the security guards have taken over an hour to go through the student's belongings, while teachers, administrators and principals go through without being checked not only is it hypocritical but unjust. Teenagers should be given the benefit of the doubt. I have been present in an event where a teacher unjustifiably read his messages out loud after his phone rang in class without him even having it in his hands. It wasn't in the teacher’s responsibility nor authority to go through his messages much less reveal his messages.We are called the next generation yet we are restricted to are given liberty's by others insecurities. If people can't practice what they preach then they should change their speech. I would rather be considered a rebellious teenager than a lying hypocrite.Trust has become nothing but a blur and a silver lining with perseption, perseption is all that they can see in the end of the…
- 473 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Teachers and administrators should be allowed to search students’ lockers because being able to search lockers creates a safer learning environment. According to opinions on the website “Debate.org”, 51% of the people who voted believe that teachers and administrators should be allowed to search lockers. Although searching students’ lockers may be against the fourth amendment ( “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable…
- 591 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever felt violated, disrespected and dishonored to the point of no return? Many students around the world feel such a way every day. According to a 2002 National School Board Association report, 10.1 percent of school districts nationwide implement the use of metal detectors. Are metal detectors even effective? Why should students be forced to cooperate with a violation of their rights? High Schools around the world should not employ the use of metal detectors at all.…
- 809 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays