Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Aed 200 Week 4

Good Essays
731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aed 200 Week 4
Week 4 Assignment When it comes to random student locker searches, I feel that all teachers have the responsibility to give any information that they may have concerning any illegal acts that their students are involved in. If this information leads to the administration searching that student’s locker, then it is being done to make sure all the students are being kept safe. I do not feel that anyone’s locker should be searched without a significant amount of proof or suspicion. It should not be done just because the student is considered a trouble maker. Though a student may be breaking the law or rules of the school, I feel that the student still has the right to have their privacy protected. When searching the locker, I feel that some discretion needs to be taken. Allowing the student body to know why and when another student’s locker is being searched would be, in my opinion, considered an infringement on their privacy. I feel that all of the students rights should always be protected. It goes with the old rule of thumb, innocent until proven guilty. Even when found guilty, the rights of the students should still be protected, but only to the extent that it maintains the safety of the student body. For example, if nothing is found during the search, not only could this be embarrassing to the student, it could also be an embarrassment to the school administration. On the other hand, if a gun were to be found in the student’s locker, then that student would not have the right to just leave the school. Their rights would be limited in order to keep the rest of the students safe. When it comes to the learning environment and the students’ rights, I feel that the teachers do have the right to infringe on the students rights in order to improve the learning environment in some instances. For example, all students have the right to an education. I feel they lose this right if they are not conducting themselves respectfully to the teachers or even the other students in the classroom. If a student is being disruptive in the classroom, I feel that the teacher has the right to ask that the student be removed from their classroom. Even though the student has the right to an education, they lose that right when they infringe on the other students’ rights to their education. So, depending on the situation, a teacher should be able to make the choice to remove some given rights of one student in order to make sure the majority of the other students’ rights are being upheld. A situation where a teacher’s responsibility to protect their students safety limited another student’s rights was when a female student was attacked by a male student on my daughter’s school bus last year. The female student was sitting and minding her own business, from what the other students were saying, when the male student approached the female. He made sexual suggestions to the female. When she told the young man to leave her alone and she was not interested, the young man became embarrassed and enraged. He grabbed the young lady and forced himself onto her. When the incident was investigated, the male student lost his right not only to ride the school bus, he was also expelled from the school. His right to a free education in his local public school was taken away from him due to his own behavior. I feel the teachers and administration had the right to remove the male students right to an education based on his own actions. When it comes to teaching special needs children, there are some teachers who would rather not have these children in their classroom. Though it is the teachers right to not want a given student in their classroom, it is the teacher responsibility to teach the students assigned to their classroom and it is the student’s right to an appropriate education. I feel the students rights over ride the teachers’ rights, in this situation. The teacher should not be permitted to not have a special needs student in their classroom, just because they do not feel comfortable with this or because the student learns in a different manner than the other students in the classroom. All students should be treated equally, in all situations.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Best V. New Jersey Case

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages

    School administrators and law enforcement officers have different regulations when a search or seizure is being conducted, especially concerning that of a minor. School administrators only need reasonable suspicion to search a student while law enforcement officers must have probable cause. In the cases of Best V. New Jersey and Safford V. Redding, the issues of search and seizure of a student in school are laid out in different scenarios that clearly portray the difference between a constitutional search and an unconstitutional search. The concept of reasonable suspicion is sufficient for the extended search in the Best V. New Jersey case because the student was in clear violation of school policy and the search was necessary to maintain safety and order in the school;…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arizona vs Grant

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kathy Davis, John Kelsey, Dia Langellier, Misty Mapes, and Jeff Rosendahl Surveillance in Schools: Safety vs. Personal Privacy Locker Searches students.ed.uiuc.edu/jkelsey/surveillance/locker.htm…

    • 1130 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill”, the students’ expectation of privacy outweighs the obligation of the school leaders to maintain good order and discipline in that there is no clear and reasonable threat to student safety or order. The students’ constitutional rights should not be jeopardized over twenty dollars. Furthermore, a bathroom search of any students must be reasonable related to the objectives of the search and must not be excessively intrusive. Since there was only twenty-dollars involved this case, a bathroom search would be highly unconstitutional considering the age of the students and amount of money involved. This is evidenced by a similar case Safford vs. Redding 2008.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Random Locker Searchs

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page

    First and foremost, irregular locker searches help to reduce violence and drug use in schools. Randomized locker searches help to find any weapons or drugs being hidden by student in lockers. THe searches can help to save lives, if there is a weapon found. If it is suspected that the student id breaking a law, or even school rule, a locker search may be carried out to see if the allegations are true.…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aed 204 Week 8 Checkpoint

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is important for a teacher to be on the lookout for the above-mentioned signs and symptoms to identify at risk students. If a student is showing any of these signs, it is important for a teacher to take the appropriate steps to intervention. This usually would start with informing the principal of the situation. From there, it may be to contact the student’s parents if the situation is drug or suicide related. In child abuse cases, contacting social services would be important. It is important not to let these symptoms go unnoticed because the result could be fatal.…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Random Locker Searches

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although conducting random locker searches are beneficial in exceptional and deficient ways, many citizens will disagree with being able to have locker searches. Conducting locker searches could also help detect illegal substances and weapons, used for bullying or even to seriously injure a peer. On the other hand, locker searches violates privacy.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aed222 Checkpoint Week 6

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Early Intervention can help to enhance the child 's development, provide support and assistance to the family, and to maximize the child 's and family 's benefit to society. Children who are found to be profoundly gifted will be given academic based test and a creativity based test. This will identify what level of intervention is needed if any.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All children have the right to access all the opportunities which are on offer in the school provision. Each and every pupil has the right to learn and should not be discriminated against for any reason.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are sever fact that prove the random locker searches are a great idea.Everyone all over the world parents,teachers and students agree that school need to be a safe place.This is a reason you will never know what might happen kids can bring guns and bombs.Most people would not thank kids would bring guns and more stof like that but they will.A locker is space owned by the school that students are given the privilege of using to store their supplies. Students carry backpacks and other necessary things such as a purse, phone and keys. A locker is owned by the school, so therefore, as the locker is not part of a student’s private life and affairs, no…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, it is obvious that all students are created equal and are given by their creator the rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of whatever makes them happy. To get these rights, teachers should allow students do as they wish. However, when teachers begin a long train of mistreatment and machination against students with their communistic ways and Pearl Harbor sneak attacks with discipline it shows they only want to control every aspect of our lives. Do we not deserve respect? It is the duty and right of us sapient students to get rid of the control our fastidious teachers have over the students and our school.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, the students see the searches of their lockers is an invasion of property given by the school itself "The biggest drawback to a school locker search is the lack of trust students may feel as a result of actions they see as an invasion of privacy. Because students may keep personal items in their lockers, such as photographs and personal letters, even a search with the best intentions can appear to be a major breach of trust by teachers and administrators, causing a rift between the student body and the faculty" (classroom-synonym) the evidence states that the searches would be negative in many ways. First being a violation of the 4th amendment, and second, searches decrease the trust between teacher and students in an environment where the teachers require the students to trust them. In addition, the students feel that it is a violation of their privacy. Students question why they are being targeted. Some schools say that the lockers are their property, however backpacks are the students’ private property, but schools state that whatever comes to school, the teachers are obliged to search if reasonable (classroom-synonym). In the case of New Jersey v T.L.O, although the bag was owned by…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To them, it protects students rather then invading their privacy. Going through student's things doesn't ensure safety, it makes them not trust school authority. Others believe that students can't be trusted with bags in school. Again, this causes students to not trust advisors at school. If administrators want students to trust them, they shouldn't search their things without their permission. Limitations on student's Fourth Amendment rights are inexcusable.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that lockers should be checked because there could be drugs, alcohol, and weapons in the lockers. Bringing all of this stuff to school is highly against the rules and against the law. These things could kill you and you could kill others. If student’s lockers were checked it would reduce the gun killing and selling of drugs. Student’s lockers should be checked randomly. With randomly checking the lockers, students will not know what day they will be checked. They will never know when to take the drugs, guns, or alcohol out of the locker.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Rights talk seeps into spheres of American society where a sense of personal responsibility and of civic obligation traditionally have been nourished. An intemperate rhetoric of personal liberty in this way corrodes the social foundations on which individual freedom and security ultimately rest." Because I agree with this quote, I firmly resolve the resolution that establishing a safe educational environment for grades K-12 justifies the infringement of civil liberties.…

    • 539 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equality

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only these rights are protecting them but also it saves them from abuses. These rules are implementing in schools in different ways. Every rule is protecting the young people and children in different…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics