Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Against Same Sex Marriage

Better Essays
1284 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Against Same Sex Marriage
he legalization of the marriage between same sex couples will permanently change the rite of marriage in our society. The legalization of homosexual marriage will quickly destroy the traditional family.

Marriage is the institution that forms and upholds for society, the cultural and social values and symbol related to procreation. That is, it establishes the values that govern the transmission of human life to the next generation and the nurturing of that life in the basic societal unit, the family. Through marriage our society works out the relationship of two people who will together create and nurture a new generation.

To change the definition of marriage to include same sex marriage couples would destroy its capacity to function in many ways. It could no longer represent procreative relationships of opposite sex marriages.Reproduction is the fundamental occurrence on which the future of life depends. It is the primary reason why marriage is so important to society. In same sex marriages procreation would be eliminated entirely.

First, when the state sanctions homosexual relationships and gives them its blessing, the younger generation becomes confused about sexual identity and quickly loses its understanding of lifelong commitments, emotional bonding, sexual purity, the role of children in a family, and from spiritual prospective, the sanctity of marriage. Marriage is reduced to a partnership that provides attractive benefits and sexual convenience. Cohabitation and short term relationships are the inevitable result.

Second, the introduction of legalized gay marriages will lead to polygamy and other alternatives to the one man, on woman unions. Why will gay marriage set the table for polygamy? Because there is no place to stop once the line has been crossed. Historically, the definition of marriage has rested on a foundation of tradition, legal precedent, theology, and the overwhelming support of the people. After the introduction of marriage between homosexuals it will be supported by nothing more substantiated than the opinion of a single judge or by a black-robed panel of justices (Marriage under Fire).

After their decision, the family will consist of little more than someone's interpretation of rights. Given that unstable legal judgment, it is certain some self-possessed judge, somewhere, will soon rule that three men or three women can marry. How about group marriage or marriage between cousins, or marriage between parent and child? How about marriage between a man and his animal? Anything allegedly linked to civil rights will be doable. The legal underpinnings for marriage will have been destroyed. These other couples restricted from marrying are not equivalent to homosexual couples, but are necessary to illustrate that marriage is heavily regulated, and for good reason. When a state recognizes a marriage, it bestows upon the couple certain benefits which are costly to both the state and other individuals. Collecting a deceased spouse's social security, claiming an extra tax exemption for a spouse, and having the right to be covered under a spouse's health insurance policy are just a few examples of its costly benefits associated with marriage. In a sense, a married couple receives a subsidy. A marriage between two unrelated heterosexuals is likely to result in a family with children. For this reason, states have, in varying degrees, restricted from marriage, couples unlikely to produce children.

One may argue that lesbians are capable of procreating via artificial insemination, so the state does have an interest in recognizing lesbian marriages, but a lesbian's sexual relationship, committed or not, has no bearing on her ability to reproduce (Single Parent: What Helps, What Hurts). However, there is ample evidence that children need both female and male parent for proper development. It is essential for a child to be nurtured by parents of both sexes if a child is to learn to function in a society made up of both sexes (Life without Father). With the legalization of homosexual marriage, every public school in the nation will be required to teach that this lifestyle is the moral equivalent of traditional marriage between a woman and a man. Textbooks, even in conservative states, will have to depict man/man and woman/woman relationships and stories written for children as young as elementary or even kindergarten, will have to give equal space to homosexuals. Every public school will also be forced to teach that same sex marriage and homosexuality are perfectly normal. They will teach little boys and little girls that husband and wife and father and moother are merely optional for a family and therfore, meaningless (No Gay Marriage). Same sex families deny children either a mother or father. In certain cases, the same sex family is not driven by the needs of children, but rather by the radical wishes of a small group of adults. Thousands of published social science, psychological and medical studies show that children living in fatherless families, on average, suffer dramatically in every measure of well-being. These children suffer from higher levels of loneliness, physical or mental illness, behavior problems, educational failure or criminal troubles.

The third reason marriage between homosexuals will destroy traditional marriage is that this is the ultimate goal of activists, and they will not stop until they achieve it. Homosexual activists, with their inner power and exhilaration, feel the political climate is right to tell us what they have wanted all along. Gay marriages are likely to do for gay rights what the rallying cry of "abortion on demand" did for the Equal Rights Amendment and the women's movement. It diverts the real debate on every level. It reduces the cause of gay rights to a single issue. But the real deal is most gays and lesbians do not want to marry each other. They do not want to entangle themselves in all sorts of legal constraints (Single Parent What Helps, What Hurts). In a perfect democratic world, gay marriage would be an option for those who want it. However, this world is not a perfect democracy, and the fight for gay marriage is the wrong fight at the wrong time (Focus on Family).

In conclusion, the reason for excluding same sex couples from marriage matters: If the reason for denying homosexual marriage is that we have no respect for same sex couples and their relationships and want to give the message that homosexuality is wrong, then that is discrimination and that is wrong. On the other hand, if the reason is to keep the very nature, essence and substance of marriage intact, and the essence is to protect the procreative relationship, then excluding same sex couples from marriage is ethically acceptable. This such refusal is not discrimination. Ethics requires us to take the least invasive, least restrictive alternative, reasonably available and likely to be effective in achieving a justified goal. Maintaining a traditional marriage and legally recognizing same sex partnerships fulfills that ethical requirement (Why Marriage Matters).

Gay and lesbian people have a right to form meaningful relationships. They do not have a right to redefine marriage for all of us. What will happen to society if marriage becomes anything or everything or nothing? The short answer is that the state will lose its compelling interest in marital relationships altogether. After marriage has been redefined, divorces will be obtained instantly, will not involve a court, and will take on the status of a driver's license or hunting permit. With the family out of the way, all rights and privileges of marriage will accrue to gay and lesbian partners without the legal entanglements and commitments associated with it.

These are a few reasons why I am against homosexual marriage. Legalizing it will change everything, especially the institution of the family. Every society needs natural marriage- as many men as possible each finding a woman, caring for and committing himself exclusively to her- working together to create and raise the next generation.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Lobbying Plan

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The promoters of same-sex “marriage” propose something entirely different. They propose the union between two men or two women. This denies the self-evident biological, physiological, and psychological differences between men and women which find their complementarily in marriage. It also denies the specific primary purpose of marriage: the…

    • 1696 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jeff Jordan Parity Thesis

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In regards to everyone’s well-being, people should be able to do whatever they choose, as long as it does not bring harm to others. Respecting personal choices of others can be harmless because it cannot exactly harm anyone outside of that relationship. As a social norm, marriage is composed of and supports several aspects of life. It seems Marriage can exist without aspects of sexual relations, friendship and companionship, love, and responsibilities. Marriage is a civil, religious and expressive aspect; it is a symbolic institution. Public debates about same sex marriage develops questions in forms of religion, which finds same sex marriages unacceptable but take this matter internally. In a civil aspect, married people get a lot of government benefits which can occur as a conflict in rights as some people may agree to fairness than those who…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    So going back to the question, “How would the legalization of gay marriage harm current and future heterosexual marriages?” Benne and Mcdormott both believe there are compelling reasons why the gay marriage would be. 1) bad for marriage, 2) bad for children, and 3) bad for society. 1. First the acceptance of gay marriage would be the very definition of marriage itself. In every Western society…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Society sees marriage as a sacred act of commitment and believes that same-sex marriage will end the purity of such…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Same sex marriage didn’t come to issue all of sudden. Despite U.S. same-sex couples have the freedom to marry in 37 states yet still facing prejudiced public gaze. To follow most people’s religious beliefs or traditions, same-sex marriage is something which shouldn’t be happening or accepted however, every person have the right to love and stay with whom they love. Same-sex marriage might be an issue against to our belief but when we get rid of our prejudice it could be nothing different than heterosexual marriage.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether an individual is against gay marriage or for it, we all have an opinion on the issue. Andrew Sullivan’s describes how marriage as a basic need for individuals no matter their sexual orientation. However, William Bennett believes that “same- sex marriage would do significant, long term social damage” (1138). Whether we like it or not gay marriage influences marriage institution, culture, and their children.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The targeted market for the pet supply’s stores new product is in area code 90066 which is located in Los Angeles, California which is next to Venice and Marina Del Rey. This area promotes a very dynamic outdoor lifestyle. 2017 statistics show that this targeted market consists of wealthy young to middle age segments with incomes ranging from 150k to millions. They also have advanced degrees, and sophisticated tastes to match their credentials (“Welcome to segmentation and market solutions,”…

    • 80 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Snoop Lion/Doog

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Calvin Broadus better known as Snoop Dogg was born on October, 20, 1971 in Long Beach California. Snoop got his nickname because of his mom, she said she looked like a character from a TV show. After graduating from high school snoop got busted several times for possession of drugs. His first single was called hold on which was the first song hear by Dr. Dre. Dre taught snoop how to create better songs with verses, hooks, and chorus. Snoop has a very different tone than all the other rappers, he has a more mellow tone, while other rappers are very aggressive in their songs. Doggystyle was the first album release in 1992. This album made its way to the top with its biggest songs being “What’s my name” and “Gin n Juice.” He then released his next album called the Doggfather witch didn’t sell as good and it wasn’t one of his biggest album either. After this album was release Snoop had a big conflict with death row records and he stop giving the company song but he did produce one more song before his contract expire it was called “F**k death row.” Snoop Dogg however was moving away from his gangsta roots when he released his album no limit top dogg selling over a million copies of it. After being done with no limit he then sign into Capitol Records he released paid the cost to be da boss he stop being a G and he was becoming a pimp. Drop it like it’s hot was snoop’s first song to be number one. Snoop work with Warren G and Nate Dogg in the group 213 and released the album the hard way. On July 31, 2012, Snoop Dogg changed his stage name to Snoop Lion. Snoop decided to change his name after traveling to Jamaica where he worked in his reggae project and met with a priest who told him, “You are the light’ you are the lion.” After the meeting, Snoop immediately changed his name to “Snoop Lion.”. On February 4, 2012, Snoop Dogg announced his new upcoming album call Reincarnated. On July 20, 2012, Snoop Dogg released…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    First you have the “anti-gay marriage” people. This group believes that only a man and a woman should be married. This is the way it is, has been forever, and should remain as is. One of the biggest reasons that people say this has to do with God and the bible. What is written there is law and should never be changed. Rev. Philip H. Curtis, of Exeter Chapel in Rhode Island recently said “Historically our marriage laws…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The true meaning of marriage is sharing vows between two people to bind their feelings toward each other forever. Many feel that the sanction should be shared between a man and a woman and if it is opened to homosexuals this will take away from the importance of marriage. According to Robert Cummings, a writer for the Flint Journal, states, “Gay marriage is a mockery of a marriage between a man and a woman” (Cummings). A large amount of society feels that if gay people are married the sanction of marriage will become corrupt and will no longer be as important as it currently is. If marriage is such an important sanction between a man and a woman that will be corrupted by gay people, than why are men and women getting divorced each day as if marriage means nothing? Straight people take advantage of the privilege they have to wed, while gay couples have to suffer because they are not considered “normal”. Everyone is so fixed on the point that if they allow homosexuals to marry there will be an increase in the divorce rate, yet, no one has any real proof of this actually happening. At this point in time the divorce…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Argumentative Essay

    • 1599 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As of November 20, 2014, same –sex marriage has been legalized in 35 out of 50 U.S. states. Same-sex marriage is a hot topic which the Supreme Court is considering to legalize. Many people say a homosexual person is a sinner. The question is do homosexual people choose his or her gender? They were born that way and they are happy with their lives. Homosexual people are nothing unlike heterosexual people. They are living, they are working, and they contribute to society. Proponents state that same-sex couples should have access to the same marriage benefits and public acknowledgment enjoyed by heterosexual couples and that prohibiting gay marriage is unconstitutional discrimination. On the other side, opponents argue that altering the traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a woman will further weaken a threatened institution and that legalizing gay marriage is a slippery downhill way that may lead to polygamous and interspecies marriages (gaymarriage.procon.org). All people in the world should understand the meaning of marriage, whether a same-sex marriage or a traditional marriage. For that reason, same-sex marriage should be considered as a legal marriage because it is an equal right for humankind and beneficial for society as well as preventing youth suicide.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gay Marriage

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the primary reasons that the United States has become the most successful country in the world is because of how strong the family situation is and has been since the onset of our founding fathers. What people over look about the idea of gay marriage is the actual purpose and definition of marriage itself. The entire purpose of marriage is to procreate. Men and women are supposed to have children, raise a family while instilling moral values, and at the same time contribute to society and further their own wellbeing. Marriage as an institution was created to help make it possible for men and women to juggle all of the tasks demanded by society and the human race as a whole. If one of the primary points for married couples is to procreate, then how can we give the right of marriage to homosexuals who cannot…

    • 1462 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legalizing same sex marriages has very serious implications on religious liberty. This is because some conservative religious leaders will be forced to comply with the law by officiating a ceremony they find to be against their faith. Legalizing same sex marriages would work as a sea in the law. The change will cut across the legal and religious fraternity especially the family laws (Laycock, Picarello & Wilson, 2008).…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    same sex marriage

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The institution of marriage has traditionally been defined as between a man and a woman.In the Oct. 15, 1971 decision Baker v. Nelson, the Supreme Court of Minnesota found that "The institution of marriage as a union of man and woman, uniquely involving the procreation and rearing of children within a family, is as old as the book of Genesis.” [49]Allowing gay couples to wed will further weaken the institution of marriage. Traditional marriage is already threatened with high divorce rates (between 40% and 50%) and with 40.6% of babies being born to unmarried mothers in 2008. Allowing same-sex couples to marry would further weaken the institution.[50] [51] As argued by Ryan T. Anderson, William E. Simon Fellow in Religion and a Free Society at The Heritage Foundation, "In recent decades, marriage has been weakened by a revisionist view that is more about adults’ desires than children’s needs... Redefining marriage to include same-sex relationships is the culmination of this revisionism, and it would leave emotional intensity as the only thing that sets marriage apart from other bonds." [70]Gay marriage could potentially lead down a "slippery slope" giving people in polygamous, incestuous, bestial, and other nontraditional relationships the right to marry. [10] Glen Lavy, JD, senior counsel with the Alliance Defense Fund, argued in a May 21, 2008 Los Angeles Times Op-Ed, "The movement for polygamy and polyamory is poised to use the successes of same-sex couples as a springboard for further de-institutionalizing marriage."[11] In April 2013, Slate published a plea for legal polygamy by writer Jillian Keenan: "Just like heterosexual marriage is no better or worse than homosexual marriage, marriage between two consenting adults is not inherently more or less 'correct' than marriage among three (or four, or six) consenting adults." [71]People should not have their tax dollars used to support something they believe is wrong.Gay marriage would entitle gay couples to…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages

    An organisation regardless of its size, business environment, industry or structure relies on the ability of its leaders to motivate and influence the workforce to achieve common goals, deal with complex challenges and deliver sustainable results. The study made by Bass (1990), one of the foremost scholars on leadership, showed that the decisions made by a leader on different factors can impact on up to 65% on the success or failure of an organisation.…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics