Agrarian Magic: 20 Theories on the Origin of Religion
Agrarian Magic:
20 Theories on the Origin of Religion Religion is a species-specific human universal phenomenon, complex, full of paradoxes, and found in all cultures. Social scientists and anthropologists since the late 17th century have attempted to rationally answer questions about religion, and while we can't evaluate the veracity of religion’s claims, we can attempt to understand its functions. The methods of comparative religion, comparative mythology, with interdisciplinary analysis throughout the fields of ethnography, neuroscience, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and linguistics have made a lot of progress in the last 100 years, with a boom of database-driven analysis in the last decade. There are a number of theories attempting to explain the mystery of religion’s origin, purpose, functions and spread, from ancestor and soul worship, animism, totemism, spirit propitiation, magic theory, cultural memes, agrarian overseer gods, fear and worship of spirits, evolved adaption, or by-product of evolved adaption, and as a control mechanism. There are multiple definitions and criterion of religion, most dealing with the supernatural, the unknown, the ineffable, the numinous, that terrific agency of the gods, or the comfort of ancestors and hero archetypes. Let's examine some of these meta-theories of religion’s origins to see what we can sort out. 20 Theories on the Origin of Religion: 1. Religion as Law revealed by God I would be remiss to not recognize that large swaths of the population believe their religion is law directly revealed from god to his ecstatic prophets, who they follow the claims of. There is not much anthropological evidence of this, and we don’t have anything of note in the archaeological record which intimates the real historical existence of many of religion’s prophets, demigods, and heroes. Luckily for us our anthropological and sociological examination of religion doesn’t require us to prove
20 Theories on the Origin of Religion Religion is a species-specific human universal phenomenon, complex, full of paradoxes, and found in all cultures. Social scientists and anthropologists since the late 17th century have attempted to rationally answer questions about religion, and while we can't evaluate the veracity of religion’s claims, we can attempt to understand its functions. The methods of comparative religion, comparative mythology, with interdisciplinary analysis throughout the fields of ethnography, neuroscience, psychology, sociology, anthropology, history, and linguistics have made a lot of progress in the last 100 years, with a boom of database-driven analysis in the last decade. There are a number of theories attempting to explain the mystery of religion’s origin, purpose, functions and spread, from ancestor and soul worship, animism, totemism, spirit propitiation, magic theory, cultural memes, agrarian overseer gods, fear and worship of spirits, evolved adaption, or by-product of evolved adaption, and as a control mechanism. There are multiple definitions and criterion of religion, most dealing with the supernatural, the unknown, the ineffable, the numinous, that terrific agency of the gods, or the comfort of ancestors and hero archetypes. Let's examine some of these meta-theories of religion’s origins to see what we can sort out. 20 Theories on the Origin of Religion: 1. Religion as Law revealed by God I would be remiss to not recognize that large swaths of the population believe their religion is law directly revealed from god to his ecstatic prophets, who they follow the claims of. There is not much anthropological evidence of this, and we don’t have anything of note in the archaeological record which intimates the real historical existence of many of religion’s prophets, demigods, and heroes. Luckily for us our anthropological and sociological examination of religion doesn’t require us to prove
Bibliography: * Barrett, Justin L. Why would anyone believe in God? Altamira Press, (2004). * Brinton, Daniel Garrison. Religions of primitive peoples. GP Putnam, (1897): p. 47. * Frangois, Nama und Damara, Madgebourg, (1896): 192-193. * Goldenweiser, A. A.. The Origin of Totemism. American Anthropologist , New Series, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1912): p. 600-607. * Henning, Charles L. On the Origin of Religion. American Anthropologist 11, no. 12 (1898): 373-382. * Henrich, Joseph, Robert Boyd, and Peter J. Richerson. Five misunderstandings about cultural evolution. Human Nature 19, no. 2 (2008): 119-137. * Hoernes, M. Urgeschichte der Menschheit. (1895): p. 20. * Lamb, Weldon. Presentation: Stone Age Religion. DACC/NMSU, Las Cruces, NM, (Fall 2012): 1-99. * Lang, Andrew. Myth, ritual and religion. Vol. 1. Longmans, Green, and Co., (1899): p. 31. * Lefevre, A.. La Religion. Paris, (1892): p. 189. * Liénard, Pierre, and Pascal Boyer. "Whence collective rituals? A cultural selection model of ritualized behavior." American Anthropologist 108, no. 4 (2008): 814-827. * Lippert, Julius, and Moses David Hoffmann. Der Seelencult in seinen Beziehungen zur althebräischen Religion: eine ethnologische Studie. T. Hofmann, (1881). * Norenzayan, Ara. "Why we believe: Religion as a Human Universal." Human Morality and Sociality (2010). * Peoples, Hervey C., and Frank W. Marlowe. Subsistence and the Evolution of Religion. Human Nature (2012): 1-17. * Pyysiäinen, Ilkka, and Marc Hauser. The origins of religion: evolved adaptation or by-product? Trends in cognitive sciences 14, no. 3 (2010): 104-109. * Schaffle, M. Bau & Leben des socialen Korpers. 2. ed., vol. ii, (1896): p. 424. * Sosis, Richard, Howard C. Kress, and James S. Boster. Scars for war: Evaluating alternative signaling explanations for cross-cultural variance in ritual costs. Evolution and Human Behavior 28, no. 4 (2007): 234-247. * Spencer, Herbert. The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. D. Appleton, (1873): p. 422. * Stade, Bernhard. Geschichte des volkes Israel. Vol. 1, (1888): p. 406. * Tylor, Edward Burnett. Primitive culture: researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom. Murray, vol. 1 (1873): p. 424. 2. O 'Neil, Dennis. Magic and Religion. (2006): Web. http://anthro.palomar.edu/religion/rel_5.htm 3 4. Religulous. Evolution of Religion, Theories of the Origin of Religion. (2011): Web. http://religulous.hubpages.com/hub/evolution_of_religion 5 6. Tucker, Everett. The Paleolithic Artisans: Modern Art in the Old Stone Age. (2012): Web. http://mys.tc/2h9