Preview

Agricola and Germania

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1598 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Agricola and Germania
Kali Ryan
Agricola and Germania
Dr.Newsome
October 2, 2012
Agricola and Germania The Agricola and Germani is a novel that serves two purposes: The Agricola is a eulogy praising Tacitus's father-in-law, and commander of Britian, Agricola. The Germania is an ethnography on German people. Both stories are told through the eyes of Tacitus as he indirectly criticizes Roman politics and society. His reason for snaking in these criticisms in such a crafty manner had been due to his friendship with high ranking Roman officials whom he did not want to upset. His criticisms were derived from his experiences with Agricola, speeches given by Calgucus, and his ability to compare and contrast cultural differences of Rome and Germania, targeting Germania as a threat to Rome. Tacitus praises German culture throughout the Germania, and allows readers to applaud them for their stress on the importance of freedom, instead of bashing on them. Tacitus's opinion became an utmost crucial part of the story, that sometimes his viewpoints were stated as facts, which could dupe the reader. Also, his personal connection with Agricola added to a biased opinion on him, and an exaggeration of his accomplishments, which alter the facts. An example from the text that reveals Tacitus's biased feelings toward Agricola is evident through his theory that Agricola died by poison from Domitian, who had been apparently envious of Agricola's fame, although this theory was never proved. As a historian, military history and geographical knowledge was absent in Tacitus's work. Whereas he makes up for that as a biographer with the knowledge he did attain from his closely knit relationship with Agricola, and his ability to powerfully recite these incidents. The Agricola serves to criticizes Rome on a political level. Tacitus discretely paints Rome to be a corrupt empire with greedy, tyrannical rulers who held complete control over all aspects of Roman life. They held an impervious belief that it was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman society from republican times through to the empire worked on a system of “patronage”. Patron- client relationships existed through all levels of roman society. A patron was expected to assist his clients and their relatives by advancing their careers. In return the client had to support and further the cause of the patron, often giving them gifts. The system of patronage was particularly important for noble families of Rome, and as can be seen by Agrippina, the women of the imperial household could exert their influence as patrons. Throughout the reign of Claudius, and in the early years of her sons reign, Agrippina placed some of her clients into key positions. In AD49 used her influence with Claudius to have Seneca recalled from exile and give position as Praetor. She helped Seneca as she wanted him to tutor her son. Another of Agrippina’s Protégés was Burrus, Tacitus argues that she wanted to “remove the commanders of the guard, Lucius Geta and Rufrus Crispinus, whom she regarded as to loyal the memory and the cause of ….. Messalina children.” So Agrippina asserted to Claudius that the guard was split by their rivalry and that unified control Agrippina would mean stricter discipline , whereupon the patron client command was transferred Burrus, who was a distinguished solider but fully aware whose initiative was behind the appointment.”…

    • 264 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agrippina’s particular power was exercised most effectively during the reigns of Claudius and Nero, as portrayed in modern and ancient sources through her actions and the symbols of her power. Even from the reign of Caligula, however, she exercised more power than the average Roman woman, largely due to her Julian blood and connection with Gaius, who made her an honorary Vestal Virgin and allowed her to sit with him at the games. The title of Vestal Virgin was significant, as it allowed her to have legal advantages. But this is insignificant when compared with the power she rose to during her later life.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Scullard, H. H. (2003). From the Gracchi to Nero: A history of Rome, 133 B.C. to A.D. 68. [S.l.]: Routledge.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scalar Principle states “authority and responsibility should flow in a direct line vertically from the highest level of the organization to the lowest level” (Starling, p. 300). It can also be identified as the “chain of command”. In most work settings, utilizing the scalar principle is highly emphasized, especially in a military setting because it establishes an organized environment and different levels of authority within individuals. For example, requesting leave of absence can be approved by the first line supervisor because they are directly involved with daily operations. It is highly frowned upon skipping a member of the chain of command because many times issues can be dealt with at a lower level. At the same time, in situations…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Agrippina was related to the Claudian ‘gens’, one of the oldest and most illustrious patrician families with imperial connections. Her father Germanicus had risen through the cursus honoroum to two consulships and the proconsulships of Germany and Gaul. Germanicus’s brother was the brother was the future Claudian emperor, Claudius. Agrippina’s family lineage was therefore immensely prestigious. Her mother is quoted twice by Tacitus asserting her descent from the blood of the divine Augustus. According to revisionist Barret, Agrippina would have learnt from her mother in her formative years a powerful sense of her important place in the scheme of things.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hingley and Unwin note that Tacitus was “writing within living memory of the events. His close relationship with his father-in-law, Agricola, suggests that some of his knowledge of historical events in Britain at this time may have been passed down directly to him” (Hingley & Unwin, 2005, 43).…

    • 2164 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Starting out Tacitus talks about the people of Germania. He believes that they have never been tainted by intermarriage of other nations. Meaning he does not think that they have married outside of their “group.” They stand out as a race distinctive and pure to its kind. He goes on to talk about their body type, which relates to race, since it is physical features. They all have blue eyes, reddish hair, and a large frame. They often experience the same effects from the weather on their bodies. Tacitus also goes into detail about their ethnicity.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Struggles

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The passage (http://www.forumromanum.org/history/morey22.html) is from William C. Morey’s history text Outlines of Roman History. The outline examines the rise and fall of Antony and Octavius following Julius Caesar’s death. Review this information as well as your notes from class carefully. Then write an essay in which you analyze the power struggle in Rome.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tacitus does not avoid making some connections between Germany and his home state of Rome. It is clear that like Rome, Germany values their arms. The bestowing of arms to the youth as a symbol of honor is the German equivalent of the Roman’s giving their sons togas (Germania 4). Through this segment Tacitus does momentarily take a step back from argument it is within the nature of barbarians to be significantly different from where the homeland. With this similarity does come one major polarity that is important to note. Tacitus highlights that lack of proactivity that exists within German military tactic. He describes time of peace as being used for “idleness, giving themselves up to sleep and to feasting, the bravest and the most warlike doing nothing” (Germania 5). This is where Tacitus finds his Roman home state to be superior to this barbaric tactic. He recognizes the need to plan ahead for times of conflict rather than to be caught off guard. Sima Qian also notices this feature of the Xiongnu, how during “times of peace they enjoy themselves and have nothing to do” (Xiongnu 16). The neighboring state starts to be associated with laziness through these descriptions during times of peace, which could not be said for these historians’ home states. The custom Tacitus does highlight, however, is that in those times of conflict, very little is off limits for the Germans. This is where the accounts of the two historians once again parallel each other. There is a definite respect for the power that these neighboring clans hold and their military prowess. Sima Qian speaks of the devastating defeats those who encountered the Xiongnu faced; entire infantries were wiped out and cavalries were exterminated (Xiongnu 32-33). Tacitus’ account of wartime practices of the Germans also carries this same level or regard, emphasizing that being…

    • 1231 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Claudius was the emperor of Rome from 45-41 B.C after Caligula. Claudius married four times. His fourth and final wife was Agrippina his niece. He actually had to get the law changed to allow him to marry his niece because laws against incest previously covered first cousins.…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While reading The Burning of Rome, any person with simple observation skill may perceive Tacitus’ purpose. The readers should take what he says against Nero, and try to believe everything he says so they turn against Nero. Tacitus believes the readers should think that Nero started the fire that engulfed Tome. He wants reader to think of Nero as a corrupt, manipulative human being, and overall the worst, most evil leader that ever ruled over Rome. Tacitus uses the rhetorical strategies of pathos, description, and narration as ways to help him persuade readers to believe his point.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Caesar’s portrayal of the Romans and Gauls furthers his agenda. Caesar wishes to convince the Roman people that he is justified in fighting a war to conquer these people. By portraying them as ignorant, savage, and barbaric, it helps persuade the Roman people into believing that Caesar needs to conquer the Gauls in order to make them more civilized, like the…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The citizens of Rome are also called the plebeians. The plebeians didn’t have many lines as the main characters in the play, but they cause what the outcome of the play will be. Throughout the play, they are manipulated by their leaders, changing their minds quickly, and had an important role in the play. The common people support their leaders throughout the play, and in return the rulers would gain their trust and more power to rule in making decisions for them or against them. In Julius Caesar, the common people are easily manipulated by their leaders, but their rulers need the support of the plebeians, because they could overthrow their leaders.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Without any power, a society tends to become irrational, indecisive and flavorless. This ideal is portrayed in all scenes including plebeians, whether through direct or indirect characterization. The premiering scene portrayed Marullus and Flavius along the streets, scolding commoners for being hypocrites. “You blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things!/O you hard hearts, you cruel men of Rome,/Knew you not Pompey?” (1.1.27-29) was proclaimed by Marullus, in protest of Caesars’ celebrations. This reveals that the common people of Rome are easily swayed, as they cheered for Caesar defeating his predecessor, after recently cheering for Pompey himself. An exquisite example of the citizens’ complacency comes from the Third Plebeian. He states,“The noble Brutus is ascended: silence” (3.2.14) but yet, after a short speech from Antony regarding the conspirators, he claims, “There’s not a nobler man in Rome than Antony”( 3.2.96). Furthermore, when attending to Caesar,“We are bless’d that Rome is rid of him”(3.2.48) stated the citizens, only to later say, “They were villains, murderers” (3.2.135) merely for doing the very “ridding” they praised! Complicity and irrationality are portrayed by the violent outburst, “Revenge!—About!—Seek!—Burn!/Fire!—Kill!—Slay! Let not a traitor live” (3.2.183-184) from the citizens, once Antony’s speech is…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He is being compared to Cesare Borgia in chapter 7 and to the discussion of civil principalities in chapter 9. Agathocles is portrayed a man of “virtue of spirit and body” as well as having the “greatness of… soul” but these attributes does not qualify him to be the ruler who is virtuous. The reason for Agathocles fails to be portray the virtú is because despite his “actions of virtue” due to “his savage cruelty and inhumanity together with his infinite crimes (VIII). This illustrates that Agathocles transition in use of violence from the moderate level to excessive level to maintain the power seems to be an act that Machiavelli is against. Agathocles was born as “the son of a potter,” and he rose to through the ranks of the military in Syracuse by betraying his fellow citizens and massacring the nobility in order to establish his reign. He than appointed himself “to this position, he determined to make himself prince and to possess by force and without obligation to others.” Thus, Machiavelli makes the case that reputation is important in maintaining the power and if the ruler fails to keep the reputation clean than he can still acquire power but cannot acquire glory. In Agathocles case when looked into his action we can see that the opposite happens, he securely rules for many years “after infinite betrayals and cruelties. This gives credibility to Agathocles because the way he used…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays