Preview

Airport Screenings

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Airport Screenings
07 April 2014
Airport Searches/Screenings Airport security consists in preventing potential threats on board of aircrafts. Security measures include the screening of passengers and baggage, but also the monitoring of movements in the terminals and as well around the aircraft. Over the past few decades airports have increased their measurements of security screenings to reduce the risk of damage to property and persons. In result of this is the arrival of full body scanners at airport terminals which is a direct violation of privacy and poses a health risk on passengers in a costly manner. Multiple travelers say that TSA screeners violate the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure making plane trips more unpleasant. Violating the passengers’ privacy, since the scanners produce X-ray images of virtually naked bodies; a virtual strip search. Despite claims of “blurry and opaque images” they can in fact have the potential to become detailed images. This could potentially make the security process a humiliating experience and discourage some people from air travel. If passengers do not want to go through the scanner, they may consent to a full-body pat-down. Where they may be asked to loosen or take off some clothing or be refused entry on the plane if they do not comply. Some travelers feel that the X-rays from the scanners are potentially harmful, especially for frequent fliers. The full-body scanner emits radiation that penetrates a few centimeters into the skin and then exits leaving the image of the individual. There have emerged reports that the scanners are causing an increase in cancer cases among security officers because of exposure. This raises concerns over the health of the security personnel and the safety risks involved in the use of the equipment. Whether or not scanners should truly be used at terminals. As a result of the hijacking attacks on 9/11, the New York Times suggested the attacks themselves

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Wyoming V. Shatzer

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Since a passenger’s privacy expectations are diminished, and governmental interests at stake are large, the balancing of Fourth Amendment interests leans toward allowing searches of passengers’ belongings.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Compare And Contrast

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As we all know, on September 11, 2001 Muslim terrorists attacked the United Stated. They hijacked 4 airplanes in mid-flight. The first 2 planes flew right into 2 skyscrapers at the World Trade Center in New York City. Obviously, the buildings caught fire and collapsed. The third plane demolished part of the Pentagon (the US military headquarters) in Arlington, Virginia. The final plane crashed in Shanks Ville, Pennsylvania. Both articles agreed that exactly 19 terrorists hijacked the 4 planes; and that the attack was made by Al Qaeda, which was led by Osama bin Laden.…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Millions of people fly annually. Almost everyone has or will travel by plane in his lifetime whether he is traveling for the holidays, visiting family, or important business trips. This must mean that they must have been at an airport, and if they have been to an airport, that means they have shared the experience of airport scanners. After 9/11, security measures have been increased which seems to have led to racial profiling. The major frustrations for many Americans are the Airport Security Scanners. Scanners were created since 1992 when Dr. Steven Smith first created them. Their primary purpose is to detect anyone who is trying to smuggle any harmful object or substance that could be used as a weapon onto a plane. Some welcome the machines as protection and others see as the same threat the scanners try to pick up. It now bubbles down to the question “Should scanners or pat-downs be required to go through if one wants to travel by plane?”…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 security

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As we approach the 13th anniversary of 9/11, America’s air security is more stable. We are more prepared to confront any threats against our airlines. Prior to September 11, 2001, there was only limited technology in place to protect the threats to passengers or the aircraft. Prior to 9/11, security had been handled by each airport, which outsourced to private security companies. Immediately following the attacks, congress created the TSA agency. The new TSA implemented procedures that included stricter guidelines on passenger and luggage screening. Only ticketed passengers could go through security, and an ever-changing array of machinery and procedures were introduced to scan for weapons and destructive items. As new threats were discovered after 9/11, new procedures were introduced, including removing shoes and banning liquids.Second, we’ve improved security with technology that provides advanced screening for explosives. For example at theEven though the pain caused on September 11, 2011 will never be taken back, the American people have taken action to make the United States stronger and more determined to preserve, protect and defend the freedoms which have always defined our nation. checkpoints nationwide, “TSA utilizes Advanced Imaging Technology – among other advanced technologies such as Explosives Trace Detection and Bottle Liquid Scanners–“ that provide us with the best opportunity to detect explosives. With upgraded software, safety is even more efficient, while at the same time ensuring privacy protection for all passengers.Third, TSA now screens all air cargo transported on passenger planes domestically and we are working with our international partners to achieve this level of screening for all international inbound cargo on passenger planes. Airplanes themselves also underwent major overhauls: Fortified cockpit doors were introduced, and first-class cabin curtains were dropped by some airlines. Pilots can now apply to become a federal flight deck…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    These are part of the new rules made by the TSA after the 9/11 attacks. Even though it may seem ridiculous to do that, however it is for the safety of the people, it lessens the chances of a hijack or any harm done to people or the country itself. Shortly after 9/11 the Congress passed the USA Patriot Act. According to the article “Post-9/11 Changes By the U.S. Government” by Beth Rowen, The measure gave law enforcement officials new powers to conduct searches…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Travelers must check in at least two hours before their flight takes off, and family can no longer walk with you to the gate; only ticketed passengers go through security. There are restrictions on what travelers can bring, which can be an inconvenience. Liquids and toiletries have to be a certain size and placed in clear, sealed bags if placed in carry-on bags. Drinks are not allowed through security; if you want to bring a drink on the plane, it must be purchased once you cross through security. We must remove our shoes, belts and empty pockets. Full body airport scanners, which has received complaints of not being safe, are now used as they can detect much more than metal objects. Many government buildings and schools have since installed security devices and scanners to enhance protection. The assumption that we are safe is gone; we must be proactive and be…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Other type weapons were also discovered that passengers were carried such as 74 credit card Knives, Inert grenades and a live smoke grenade, Eight ounce of bear repellent and 17 stun guns (Holden, 2015). The Diagram above the report showed the Body full scanner is working effectively from preventing passengers bringing dangerous weapon through Airport Security Checkpoints. Even know the Terrorists groups are improving and finding new ways to attack Airport Checkpoints Security. The Full body scanner is improving this technology will help to identify or decrease terrorists threats at Airport…

    • 2663 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    9-11 Commission Report

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The good thing about having information and security from terrorist is that it keeps us safe and prevents tragedies like the one that happened on September 11th. The bad thing is that I’ve been hearing in the news that a lot of people are not comfortable with the pat down in airports because people feel violated. The screening that they do makes the public feel uncomfortable because their private areas are shown. I necessarily don’t care if they see me naked because I have nothing to hide and I want to get on a plane safe and I hope everyone else has a safe flight. I’m ok with armed air martial’s being on the plane too, you can never be too…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Scans

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The TSA protects airports by implementing frisking and full body scanners. These scanners are implemented to find guns, chemicals, bombs and other illicit substances. The full body scanners are able to view our full body under our clothes. These full body scanners are also able to detect nonmetal objects such as medicine. The Washington Post mentions how these scanners are too invasive because the data of these scans are stored not discarded as the scanners in the Netherlands as mentioned by the same article. According to the EPIC as reported by the Boston Globe, the full body scans are a direct violation of the 4th amendment because they search citizens digitally without any evidence of the citizen doing something wrong. The 4th amendment states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” A majority of these searches are unreasonable and there is no warrant to make these laws constitutional. Although there are some criticisms of the searching, according to a Gallup poll conducted in 2010, a majority of Americans are fine with a full body scans thinking it is more…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At present, forty airports have full body scanners and eleven are in the process of receiving them. A few of the airports that currently have them are Denver International Airport (DEN), Dallas/Ft. Worth Airport (DFW), Tulsa International Airport (TUL), Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), etc. Shortly, Boston Logan International Airport, Chicago O’Hare International Airport and Kansas City International Airport will be an addition onto the list of airports with full body scanners. By the end of 2011, the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) projects to have over 1200 full body scanners active in airports across the United States.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Amendment Prevention

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This amendment is demolished the moment you step through the doors of an airport. Many people believe this to be an issue. The aviation and transportation security act poses a blanket that allows searches without cause as long as terrorism poses a risk. However, the searches should not be more than necessary. For example, body scanners are an intrusion on privacy, for they take pictures of your naked body to ensure harmful objects are not smuggled through security. In addition, it forces the elderly to raise their arms when they are weak and frail to take a picture of their body. Also, passengers can be accused of “possible” smuggling resulting in a “handsy” pat down. Such as, bladder cancer patient, Thomas Sawyer left the airport mortified. Thomas had been a bladder cancer patient for years having a urostomy bag to collect his urine. He was on his way to Florida when he was stopped in security and had to have a pat down. This resulted in a TSA agent hitting his urostomy bag after being warned and broke the seal of the bag causing urine to spray everywhere especially on Sawyer. Sawyer said,“I was absolutely humiliated, I couldn’t even speak.” (Harriet Baskas) In conclusion, this violates people’s individual rights by intruding on their privacy. Is traveling worth it in these…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fourth Amendment was written to secure that our rights are protected against unreasonable search and seizures for all citizens. The TSA has also said you are free to board their planes, however one is not free to leave the screening area before you board the plane itself . That being said the government is not allowed to take a civilian into custody, unless something has or had been brought to their attention that someone has at one point broken the law while on what property or actually witnessing it. Civilians are not to be thrown into custody just for walking outside of their home like the TSA seems to assume if an individual would like to use a plane. Our Fourth Amendment is there for us when these factors come into play for these specific…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore, the United State have spent large amount of capital to improve the screening process. One of the technology that the TSA is continuing to improve and invest in is the x-ray screening of carryon articles. A large amount of the capital spent is on airport terminal expansions and state-of-art equipment acquisitions, and recruiting and training screening staff. Airports across the United States have employed advanced airport screening technology to reduce the risk of a terrorist attack. These new forms of airport screening technologies have save lives and prevented terrorist attacks from occurring, therefore biometric identity-management solutions which range from iris, hand and facial scans have become very popular within airport in recent years. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is responsible for carrying out the screening procedures to ensure no hazmat material enter the…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    TSA Argumentative Essay

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The TSA (Transportation Security Administration) search people at airports. That is their job. Sadly, they are very bad at their job.Their highly intrusive searches have driven kids to tears, to do what? See if the 6 year old clutching onto his mom for dear life sobbing is packing a gun? Well, yes and nothing can be done to stop it. The TSA should not be gotten rid of… just reworked completely. Planes have gotten more advanced over the years and now have criminals. See how airport security Isn’t on that list? It’s because it hasn’t gotten more advanced. In 2015 the TSA missed all mock weapons and explosives that tried to get through. The TSA is invading the universal rights that people have. The government needs to change how security runs because they are doing it wrong. People may argue that they have stopped over 10,700 people from entering the US but this is a miniscule number compared to the amount of illegal immigrants who actually come.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Common Ground

    • 1599 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 2010 and 2011, when Michael Madison Taylor wrote “Bending Broken Rules: The Fourth Amendment Implications Of Full-Body Scanners In Preflight Screening” and William Bradshaw wrote “Borderline: Why The Federal Government May Use Backscatter Technology To Search Vehicles and Containers At International Borders, But The Fourth Amendment May Block Its Use On Persons,” this debate about full-body scanners was beginning to surface in the public. Bradshaw, an attorney with multiple degrees including a Juris Doctor, argues that screening with no suspicion or warrant does not violate Fourth Amendment rights, as long as the search is routine. However, Taylor, a lawyer with the same credentials, disagrees. He believes that the use of full-body scanners should only be used for secondary screening after probable cause is identified. Although these two authors’ positions on the debate appear to be wholly opposed, common ground exists, because they share the idea that full-body scans using backscatter technology should be permitted, but only in a way that uses suspicion as a motive to screen a person.…

    • 1599 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays