Akitek vs Mid Valley City
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 2.0 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 2 NAME AND BACKGROUND OF DISPUTE PARTIES............................................................. 3 The Plaintiff (Akitek Tenggara Sdn Bhd) ................................................................................ 3 History .................................................................................................................................. 3 Scope of Works .................................................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2 3.0 3.1 3.2
The Defendant (Mid Valley City Sdn Bhd).............................................................................. 3 NATURE OF DISPUTE AND NARRATIVE OF THECASE ..................................................... 4 Nature of Disputes ..................................................................................................................... 4 Narrative of the Case ................................................................................................................. 5 Facts ..................................................................................................................................... 5 The Project .......................................................................................................................... 5 Terms of the Plaintiff’s Appointment................................................................................ 6 The Plaintiff’s Case ............................................................................................................ 6 Case for Defendant ............................................................................................................ 7 The Claim ............................................................................................................................ 7
1.0 2.0 2.1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 2 NAME AND BACKGROUND OF DISPUTE PARTIES............................................................. 3 The Plaintiff (Akitek Tenggara Sdn Bhd) ................................................................................ 3 History .................................................................................................................................. 3 Scope of Works .................................................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2 3.0 3.1 3.2
The Defendant (Mid Valley City Sdn Bhd).............................................................................. 3 NATURE OF DISPUTE AND NARRATIVE OF THECASE ..................................................... 4 Nature of Disputes ..................................................................................................................... 4 Narrative of the Case ................................................................................................................. 5 Facts ..................................................................................................................................... 5 The Project .......................................................................................................................... 5 Terms of the Plaintiff’s Appointment................................................................................ 6 The Plaintiff’s Case ............................................................................................................ 6 Case for Defendant ............................................................................................................ 7 The Claim ............................................................................................................................ 7
Bibliography: Bruce M. Jervis, P. L. (1988). Construction Law: Principles and Practice. United State of America: McGraw-Hill. IBS, G. S. (2013). Goldsmith International Business School. Retrieved MAY 12, 2013, from http://www.goldsmithibs.com/resources/free/Breach-of-Contract/notes/Breach-of-ContractRemedies.pdf NOLO. (2013). TYpes of Contract Breach. Retrieved May 10, 2013, from LawFirm.com: http://www.lawfirms.com/resources/business/types-contract-breaches.htm Oxford University Press. (2009). Oxford, Dictionary of Law. United States: Market House Books Ltd. SERVICES, C. D. (n.d.). SPECIALIZING IN MEDIATION & ARBITRATION & DISPUTE REVIEW BOARD. Retrieved MAY 1, 2013, from CREATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION: http://www.constructiondisputes-cdrs.com/creative_dispute_resolution_proc.htm Shuttie, C. &. (2010). Retrieved MAY 7, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_contract The Mirkhan Law Firm. (2013). Breach of Construction Contracts. Retrieved May 11, 2013, from The Mirkhan Law Firm: http://www.losangelesbusinesslitigationfirm.com/BusinessLitigation/Breach-of-Construction-Contracts.aspx Watt, J. M. (1998, Volume 2). Estates Gazette Law Reports . Taylor & Francis. Wikipedia. (2012, 12 11). Hochster v De La Tour. Retrieved May 14, 2013, from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hochster_v_De_La_Tour 16