Suicide is, according to Sartre, “an opportunity to stake out our understanding of our essence as individuals in a godless world” (Stanford, 2004). Fundamentally, existentialism argues all individuals are free and therefore responsible for their actions. Thus, it is up to the individual to create an ethos of personal ideology, which is the only way one is able to rise above the human condition of suffering, death and finality (Guigon, 2001). Suicide is seen as the individual’s act of giving in to the absurdity of human life. In other words, when a human is unable to create meaning out of the absurdity that surrounds him or herself, her or she live the typical life of pain, suffering, death and thus make suicide a natural act of existence (Guigon, 2001). Two leading existentialists in the philosophy of suicide are Albert Camus and Arthur Schopenhauer. Albert Camus (1913–1960) was considered a leading twentieth century philosopher and writer of existentialist thought, who won the Nobel Prize in 1957 (Guigon, 2001). Although he is often associated with existentialism, he believes that existentialism is philosophical suicide and that the act of suicide is a rejection of freedom. Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) was among the first to contend that at its core, the universe is not a rational place. Schopenhauer was inspired by Plato and Kant, and was known as the educator of Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, who he heavily influenced (Stanford, 2004). Schopenhauer predating the existential movement, his philosophy set the foundation for the concepts of human absurdity and the pain and suffering of life (Guigon, 2001). Taken together, the two philosophers explain the philosophy of suicide through the concepts of human absurdity, the naturalness of pain and suffering, and the inability to give meaning to life. As a result, both Camus and Schopenhauer argue that the act of suicide is a natural response to an inability to cope with a society that simply does not make sense.…