Albert Parsons Dbq Analysis

Based on the documents, it can be inferred that Albert Parsons was indeed a threatening man. In document c, it asserts that the anarchists, including Albert Parsons, were very fond of dynamite (Document C). As known, dynamite is a high explosive substance that stimulates destruction and chaos. The evidence suggests that since Parsons was very affectionate to the use of dynamite, it can be inferred that he is a very chaotic and destructive individual that only seeks extremist methods to accomplish an objective. Moreover, in document d, an article published in the New York Times at the time, it is explained how Parsons incited rebellion and chaos by promoting his followers to overthrow the system through the use of violence. He conveys the idea that the problem is not found in a single individual but rather is found in their form of government (Document D).
Furthermore, in document F, a testimony given by the mayor of Chicago, describes a primary experience during the chaos that was incited by Albert Parsons himself. The narrator explains that the crowd, in which was under the command of Parsons, was very hostile and threatening. They were compelled to cause disorder under the order of “To arms!” by the anarchist in power (Document F). The evidence suggests that Parsons was an aggressor rather than a passive individual. It is evident that his motives are for destruction and the annihilation of the governmental system. Although Parsons does assure that his intentions were not to be destructive but rather beneficial, his actions contradict such statement. Ultimately, based on the laid out facts, it can be reasoned that Albert Parsons was indeed a dangerous and hostile