Preview

Alberta Tar Sands Sustainability Report

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1256 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alberta Tar Sands Sustainability Report
Alberta Tar Sands Sustainability Report
Introduction
Tar sands are a combination of clay, sand, water, and bitumen. As a type of unconventional petroleum deposit, tar sands are found in many places worldwide, the largest deposits are found in Alberta, Canada. The Alberta tar sand deposits contain more than 70.8% of the world 's reserves of natural bitumen which representing 40% of the world’s combined extra-heavy crude oil and crude bitumen reserves. It is the only bitumen deposits that are economically recoverable for conversion to synthetic crude oil at the price range of $25-$35 per barrel. Although substantial amount of the world 's oil is in the form of tar sands, it is not all recoverable. Study shows that the world’s total natural bitumen reserves are estimated at 249.67 billion barrels, Canada maintains 176.8 billion barrels. Northern Alberta’s 173 billion barrels of recoverable bitumen requires intensive processing to convert to synthetic crude oil. However, there are serious social, economical and environmental consequences in the tar sands development. By grading the Alberta tar sands development on each of the six measures of Enlightened Sustainability Policy, this report will provide a detailed evaluation of the overall sustainability of the Alberta tar sands development.
Purpose:
Grade: F
The development of the tar sands project against the purpose of harness private interest to serve the public interest. The term “Public” contains two aspects: the public human aspect and the public environment aspect. First of all, the booming economies of the developing countries and the obsessive oil needs of the developed countries have triggered massive oil sand exploitation in countries like Canada. Pipeline transport companies like Keystone and Enbridge captures this opportunity to make financial growth. Instead of harness private interest to serve public interest, these companies embrace their private interest and ignore the public interests. While

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: • Canada, Environment. "Energy and The Canadian Economy." Economic Scan of Canada’s Energy Sector 1 (2008): 22.Environment Canada. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Edmonton Sun. "B.C. 's environmentalists are cool to the Northern Gateway, but the province 's gas and mineral industries are booming." Edmonton Sun. N.p., 28 Sept. 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . "Enbridge defends ad campaign on pipeline safety - Calgary - CBC News."CBC.ca - Canadian News Sports Entertainment Kids Docs Radio TV. N.p., 9 Aug. 2012. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. . Enbridge. "Benefits for Canadians - Northern Gateway." Enbridge Northern Gateway Project - Northern Gateway. N.p., n.d. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . Ipsos. "Views on Canadian Oil and Gas."Ipsos North America. N.p., 3 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. . Lee, Marc . "The Economic Cost and Benefits of the Proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline." Enbridge Pipe Dream and Nightmares 1 (2012): 26.www.policyalternatives.ca. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. Mallinder, Lorraine. "Viewpoint: Canada 's green image tarnished by new policies." BBC News. N.p., 15 May 2012. Web. 22 Oct. 2012. .…

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Andrew Nikiforuk’s environmental article, “Tarmageddon: Dirty oil is turning Canada into a corrupt petro-state,” Nikiforuk accurately supports his thesis of negative impacts on the environmental, economical, and political problems Canada could face due to the Alberta tar sands. Nikiforuk is a credited journalist who has won seven National Magazine awards and awards from the Association of Canadian Journalist. He writes passionately about the major effects that mining bitumen and long term consequences of the tar sands in Alberta. His articles has a bias and is written in a pessimistic tone against the tar sands, but is justified with concrete evidence.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The construction of the Keystone Xl pipeline will be detrimental to the environment because it will disperse greenhouse gases into the atmosphere from the extraction of tar sand. The tar sands oil production has higher levels of carbon dioxide emissions than that of conventional oil. Burning the tar sand oil will increase the earth temperature, resulting in powerful storms such as hurricanes and tornadoes. This kind of pollution will have detrimental effects on our eco system, from potential oil spill or even worse a catastrophic explosion. The release of harmful toxins into earth environment can increase health risks for nature’s inhabitants.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Keystone Pipeline has been in news for several months and has been the subject of scrutiny, political bantering and environmentalist activism. Keystone Pipeline is a transcontinental synthetic oil project that runs from Canada to the Gulf Coast. Construction of such a pipeline bears many risk associated with ecosystem disruption and environmental hazards. President Obama blocked the pipeline’s extension noting several studies that the pipeline would have adverse impact on air and water supplies.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Trans Mountain pipeline expansion is branded as a project that is going to increase revenues to 73.5 Billion dollars, employment, tax benefits, and return any farmland or wetland they disturb back to it’s place (Trans Mountain, 2014). Though, Trans Mountain is persuasive as to how the pipeline will protect the environment and indigenous people, and how the pipeline increases revenues. The company fails to mention the environmental damage that will be done when this pipeline is built, and the cost required to rectify the pollution. It fails to mention the how the loss of farmland and wetlands will affect the Canadian environment, the depletion of non-renewable energy sources. Overall, the pipeline will negatively affect all aspects of life…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The destruction of sacred lands and tarnishing of local environments are dishonesties adding to the ever increasing decay on the world. The Dakota access pipeline will increase the rate fossil fuels are consumed by oil refineries and petroleum plants for oil companies and governments seeking to profit from the faster transportation of oil. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe are one of many tribes and citizens protesting the pipeline until the government re-assesses the pipelines effects on the environment and cease construction. The distaste of the pipeline lies with Dakotas Access’s malicious practices, environmental & cultural desecration with its construction.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Government wants to build on Indians reservations. The pipe line would run through a sacred burial ground. Also, it would run under a lake the tribe considers a crucial water source for them. The Dakota Access pipeline is a $3.7 billion project that would carry 470,000 barrels of oil a day from the oil fields of western North Dakota to Illinois, where it would be linked with other pipelines. The plaintiffs claim the tribe was not properly consulted before the US Army Corps of Engineers approved the pipeline project.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today in Alberta, a huge economic development is evolving in the Athabasca oil sands. Oils sand is a natural mix of sand, clay, water, bitumen and any other minerals. This combination forms heavy oil that must be treated before it can be employed as usable fuels like gasoline. There are many methods that are currently employed in order to produce fuel from the oil sands. The oil industry is also constantly working on developing new technologies. However, at the same time as this development is happening a controversy is growing as to whether or not the development of the oil sands should be shut down.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Keystone Xl Pipeline

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Keystone XL pipeline is a possible opportunity for the United States to bring oil to the country without relying on the Middle Eastern countries. The construction of this pipeline would be in response to strong demand of crude oil in out Gulf Coast region, as a result of declining oil feeds from foreign countries. The process of approving the pipeline, beginning in 2008, has been very controversial. Those who approve of the pipeline tend to focus on its economic benefits, while those who oppose it are focusing on the ways it can be detrimental to our environment. TransCanada is the corporation who wants to build the pipeline, they are resposible for building and developing safe energy infrastructires thorughout North America. In addition to importing crude oil from Canada, TransCanada believes, “the Keystone XL Pipeline will also support the significant growth of crude oil production in the United States from producers in the Bakken region of Montana and North Dakota” (“About the”). The process for constructing this pipeline has been a long road, for both sides of the issue. The application was first submitted and…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Tar Sand Blockade, NASA’s leading climate scientist, Dr. James Hansen has called the Keystone XL pipelines “a fuse to the largest carbon bomb on the planet.” Hansen has said that if all the carbon stored in the Canadian tar sands is released into the earth’s atmosphere it would mean “game over” for the planet. Global warming is caused by the amount of carbon and greenhouse gas emissions right to the atmosphere, raising the level of the sea, weather will be wild depending on where you live; hurricanes, floods, heat waves, forest fires and there will be extinction of cretin species. The dependence on fossil fuels and oil will grow, making many problems and along with animal agriculture for livestock profits there will be destruction on this planet. There are dead zones in the sea, way less trees in forests and now sanctuaries of green lands can and will be ruined. TransCanada seems to be hesitant towards what exact chemicals are going through these pipes within the oil. Not much good can come from…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine being in the shoes of a minor, seeing a construction site on the reservation that was given to the people long ago, and now the government building a project over it, while having no say to oppose the project. Being stuck in a realm where the people voices are heard, but everything will be taken away no matter what conditions. The Dakota Access Pipeline project has caused various obligations to the Indigenous people, but the citizens also, because of the decisions the government made there will be negative outcomes due to them investing their money and time to this project, such as problems like environmental issues, interruption of sacred land use, economics and the outcome of protesting.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keystone XL Pipeline

    • 1058 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As controversy continues to rise, political and moral disputes encompass the decision to construct the extension of a tunnel containing a composition of today’s most beloved resource, and what has been referred to as “black gold” by the Arabs during the 20th century oil boom. The Keystone XL Pipeline would potentially transport thousands of barrels of oil from its source in Alberta, Canada, to refineries throughout the Midwest and Gulf Coast region of the United States. The extension would add to the number of pipelines already established in the U.S. and continue to convey the tar sands, a compound of clay, sand, water, and bitumen that its lead producer manufactures. The debate of whether or not the construction of this conduit should actually take place has been a hot topic for many politicians and environmentalists. Should the United States authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline to import tar sand oil from Canada?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the XXI century, the use of the oil and its derivatives has become widespread all around the world. Petroleum supplies one-third of the world energy, and it is the primary economic activity of many countries such as Venezuela, Saudi Arabia and Emirates Arab United; however, behind all the economical advantages that the oil brings there are many more disadvantages that the world is not concern about them. In 2015, the United States’ president Barack Obama took the first step to make aware the world about the detrimental effects of the petroleum to the environment because he denied the construction of an oil pipeline, called Keystone Pipeline XL, that would connect Texas with Canada’s oil mine in Alberta. Obama stated that the elaboration…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tar Sands

    • 2451 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Extract Tar Sands is an extraction plant company located in Athabasca, Alberta. It is a leading extraction plant, and one of the worlds most global industries. Large investments are required but the future outcomes are unknown. Athabasca has the largest reservoir of crude bitumen in the world. The tar sands go through a refining process to separate the bitumen (black viscous oil) from the mixture of clay, sand and water. Extracting oil from tar sand is much more complex than pumping oil from an oil well. When the oil is separated from the mixture of sand, normally from the use of hot water, it goes through a thinning process in order to be transported through pipelines. There are many environmental concerns with regards to the mining of tar sands which include global warming, greenhouse emissions, water and air quality from the surrounding communities as well as effects to wildlife.…

    • 2451 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Keystone Pipeline

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Have you ever wondered how toxic sludge is transported from where it was created to where it is disposed of? Well, this has become a hot button issue in the White House. Apparently, there are enormous pipes buried in ground right now transporting barrels of tar sands oil in America’s mid-west. The purpose of these pipes is to move crude oil from one place to another. Another reason for the Pipelines is to meet the needs of the American consumers. Texas has one of the largest oil manufacturing industries in all of North America; and that alone is not supplying the needs of Americans. The Keystone XL Pipeline will have a positive impact for The United States. For instance, in 2010, a 1,900 mile pipeline was approved to run from Alberta, Canada to Illinois. This line produces 35 hundred barrels of tar sands oil a day. In 2011, they added 300 miles to Oklahoma; adding this line increased the production to about 590,000 barrels of tar sands oil a day. TransCanada has applied for a permit to add 1,700 miles of pipeline from Alberta, Canada to Steele City, Nebraska, then to connect it to Texas’s gulf coast. This could increase the barrels of tar sands oil to one million a day. TransCanada, a Canadian energy company, recently proposed a multi-billion dollar project. They are attempting to get a permit for a pipeline called, the Keystone XL Pipeline Project. The pipeline will be used to transport raw toxic tar sands oil and constructed, “from the Canadian border to connect to an existing pipeline in Steele City, Nebraska.”(UPDATE) TransCanada, who is the lead producer of the pipeline, has applied for a Presidential Permit, which is required as the pipeline will cross the Canadian/United States border. President Obama’s Administration denied the proposal. As reported, on stateimpact.npr.org, “[t]he administration said at the time that TransCanada could reapply after finding…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics