Preview

Aldi Stores V Societe Des Produits Nestle S. A?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
820 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aldi Stores V Societe Des Produits Nestle S. A?
Dooney & Bourke was allowed registration of “a pebble grained texture” in combination with some other features, as a trademark for its leather handbags, but only after showing that these features combined to serve a trademark function. Further, Crown Royal’s iconic purple velvet pouch, not technically having a tactile feature, has been promoted heavily in the United States for decades. In 2006, brand owner Diageo registered the visual appearance of the Crown Royal bag having replete gold stitching as a non-traditional visual trademark by arguing that it had “acquired” distinctiveness over time. This drawback of admitting to such a strategy is that it maybe copied by competitors before the tactile element can acquire distinctiveness.
Decorative and ornamental tactile elements that are not basic and essential to be functional are eligible for protection as trademarks. To obtain protection, the bottom
…show more content…
the proceedings concern an application filed by Nestle to register a trade mark consisting of the shape of its confectionary. “The trade mark consists of the shape of the goods, being four bars attached to one another by a thin base as depicted in the representations attached to the application”. Aldi Stores opposed the on the ground the mark was inherently not capable of being distinguished and that Nestle's evidence does not establish the distinctiveness of shape on the date of application. Nestle argued that the shape was not functional and relied on the decision of Intellectual Property Office of New Zealand in Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A. v Horizon Biscuit Company Limited and Cadbury Confectionary Limited where it was IPNOZ conceded that while the shape had some functional aspects it was not entirely functional or so functional that the shape was descriptive of chocolate bars. However, IPONZ rejected that application on the basis that a shape mark could not be registered under New Zealand Trade Marks Act

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mc Cain Foods Limited

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Using the case titled 'McCain Foods Limited: Global Fries—Good in Any Language' on pages 100-101 in your text, please answer the following questions:…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Tootsie Roll Case Study

    • 2927 Words
    • 12 Pages

    The Hershey Company is currently launching new products, acquiring new companies such as Brookside, expanding their summer season, global expansion, and doubling their plant capacity. The strategy of the Hershey Company expanding involves new products such as Twizzler Bites and Jolly Rancher Bites might have an effect on the Tootsie Roll Industries and it is a new product that competes with their chewy based products such as Sugar Babies, Sugar Daddy, and their Frooties line17. The Mars Company had decided to go the root of using 100% natural materials, more sustainable approaches, and to try to strengthen the cocoa supple chain. Through strengthening this chain they hope to raise the standards through the entire industry18. The Mars strategies to attempt raise the standard of the cocoa supply chain could mean more regulations for the Tootsie Rolls Industry but at the same time better product…

    • 2927 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chocoberry Ideation

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this case, both teams know that the target group is adults who wish to indulge in chocolate, but who have been concerned with the health aspects. Manufacturing must be present since there was a concern that…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Media Law Examination

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cited: United States. U.S.court of Appeals, 1st Curcuit. Ji vs. Bose & White/Packert. 2010. Web. <http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/tmlaw.pdf >.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nestle states that “this unsavory system puts retail food stores in firm control of the marketplace.” The store, not the consumer, is actually making the decisions about what products are being bought. Due to the unsavory nature of this consumer manipulation, congress investigated the issue in 1999 but the case made little progress because of the food industry’s refusal to corporate.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Defendant, Dooney & Bourke, is an American company founded in 1975 by Peter Dooney and Frederic Bourke. The company specializes in fashion accessories and is best known for its high quality handbags, accessories, and travel luggage. Their Signature and Mini Signature handbags consist of the "DB" initials interlocking in a repeating pattern. The founders of the company started off with two introductory products: surcingle belts and suspenders for men. Their products became very popular due to their unique design and color. Now Dooney & Bourke is a well-known brand in America and has a good reputation for making quality products.The defining look of Dooney & Bourke is elegant and sophisticated, but above all, it is timeless. Its classic designs make these handbags the perfect accessory for any outfit due to the superior quality and unique…

    • 2600 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case is about Kraft Foods Inc's decision to launch a breakfast spread with the name 'iSnack 2.0' in Australia, and the controversy that followed which forced the company to withdraw the brand name. The company had decided to give the name 'iSnack 2.0' to a new version of the Australian food icon - Vegemite - in September 2009. While the company felt that the name it had arrived at after conducting an on-line brand naming contest would appeal to the generation Y segment who were using popular products such as the iPod and the iPhone, the target segment rejected the name outright and there was a huge backlash against the company. Marketing and branding experts were divided in their reactions…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Notes

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Designer - designer label items are so highly valued that the label is often displayed on the outside of the textile item so that it may be easily recognised.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Assigned case that I am to discuss is Leonard v. Pepsi Cola. In this paper I will discuss the facts of the case, the history, issues the court had to decide, the holding or the answer to the questions, the reasoning the court used to justify the decision, and finally the results and the judgment.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GMCC is a company that sells refrigerated baked goods and their success in USA compelled them to try their luck in Canadian Market, but their venture in Canada was not successful at all due to socio-economic and cultural differences thus creating a void in the marketing strategy of the company.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case- Law & Ethics

    • 22676 Words
    • 91 Pages

    We conclude that the District Court's holding that a single color can never serve as a trademark in the fashion industry, Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent Am., Inc., 778 F. Supp. 2d 445, 451, 457 (S.D.N.Y. 2011), is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's decision in Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159, 162, 115 S. Ct. 1300, 131 L. Ed. 2d 248 (1995), and that the District Court therefore erred by resting its denial of Louboutin's preliminary injunction motion on that ground. We further conclude that Louboutin's trademark, consisting of a red, lacquered outsole on a high fashion woman's shoe, has acquired limited "secondary meaning" as a distinctive symbol that identifies the…

    • 22676 Words
    • 91 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nestle Case Q&A

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On a scale from 1 to 10 (10 being ‘very difficult’), how difficult will it be for Chris Johnson to…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eskimo Pie Corp

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was mentioned in the case study that Eskimo Pie had a patent on a sugar-free frozen dairy novelty bar made with NutraSweet. Eskimo Pie’s innovation and reaction to the market would be good reasons for Nestle to acquire Eskimo Pie. The two companies together would create a good product mix, and therefore could potentially be more valuable to Nestle than as a stand-alone company. Eskimo Pie is a well-run company and has good profitability. The fact that Eskimo Pie could be easily integrated with Nestle’s product line would save a lot of efforts by Nestle because the company would not have to step into a new type…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In an increasingly competitive business world, the reputation of Swiss products has made it favourable for firms to use Swiss designations to earn extra revenues. Businesses are now using “made in Switzerland” and the “Swiss cross” to indicate the country of origin of their products. This has brought some undesirable consequences, in particular, the misuse and abuse of indications of Swiss designations.…

    • 3102 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    trademark cases

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The plaintiff in the present case is the owner of Cathilda Healthcare ltd,and is known in the trading market to be the owner of the mark “SUGAR FREE”.Many of his goods are seen to have the mark which are named as "SUGAR FREE NATURA", "SUGAR FREE GOLD" and "SUGAR FREE D'LITE"."SUGAR FREE" was actually coined and accepted by its predecessor (Cadila Chemicals Limited) in respect of its sugar substitute. "SUGAR FREE" contained aspartame - an artificial sweetener. The above three products were distinguished by this artificial sweetener and hence there suffix differed as “natura” due the use of sucralose , “gold” due to the use aspartame.So,the real dispute arises when a company named Dabur India Limited manufactures a product named “chyavanprash” a health tonic, with a mark "SUGAR FREE”. So naturally, plaintiff prays for an interim injunction in order to restrain the defendant from using the expression "Sugar Free" on any of the products manufactured by the defendant as the plaintiff states that by using the expression "Sugar Free" on its products, the defendant is passing off its goods with that of the plaintiff. The plaintiff pleads to restrain such alleged passing off by way of a permanent injunction in the suit against the defendant.…

    • 1942 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays