Ms. Disston
P5
3 October 2014
Alexander the Great Hero or Villain?
Alexander the Great, a king, commander, politician, explorer, and a scholar; a hero or a villain. Tutored by Aristotle himself in philosophy, politics, history, literature and medicine. Inherited his father’s, king Philip II of Macedon, kingdom and became king of Macedonia. Alexander the great is called the ‘greatest military leader of all time’ by many historians. While conquering different empires, Alexander learned about their cultures and spread their different ideas. He became the leader of the Greeks, ‘overlord’ of the Asian Minor, Pharaoh of Egypt, and a king of Persia and Macedonia at the young age of 25. Alexander allowed people to continue practicing their religions even after they were conquered.
After Alexander the Great inherited his father’s kingdom, he executed anyone who showed sign of conspiracy against him. He conquered an enemy city called Thebes, enslaved the cities families and sold the women and children into slavery. Alexander then demolished every building in the city. He moved onto Persia; who were the rivals of Macedonias. His troops took control of the Persian capital and destroyed all of their temples. Those Persian temples were part of their culture and way of life. Alexander learned about Buddhism from the Brahmins and then executed them.
I believe Alexander the Great was a very intelligent and powerful man, but how he acted wasn’t so great. He destroyed and took over territories from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indus River. His army enslaved many women and children and his troops murdered and executed thousands of innocent people. Alexander’s army destroyed cities, towns, villages, and whole empires. When he ordered his troops to destroy the Persian temples, he destroyed a piece of Persian culture. My great-grandfather is Iranian/ Persian, which makes me somewhat Persian. Alexander the Great played a big role as a villain in many innocent people’s lives.
Works Cited
“Alexander the Great (356 - 323 BC).” BBC News. BBC, 2014. Web. 8 Oct. 2014
“Alexander The Great.” Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia.
World Almanac Education Group, Inc., 2014. Web. 5 Oct. 2014.
History.com Staff “Alexander the Great.” History.com. A+E Networks, 2009. Web. 6 Oct. 2014
Cited: “Alexander the Great (356 - 323 BC).” BBC News. BBC, 2014. Web. 8 Oct. 2014 “Alexander The Great.” Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia. World Almanac Education Group, Inc., 2014. Web. 5 Oct. 2014. History.com Staff “Alexander the Great.” History.com. A+E Networks, 2009. Web. 6 Oct. 2014
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Now, instead of simply discussing his most glorious battle and successful expansion of his empire by overthrowing the Persian Empire. And although they were a major success to his rising to power. People must be able to understand exactly how even after defeating his enemies, Alexander ran these new additions to his empire and effected them through cultural influence. While Alexander was exceedingly bright, some may have doubted how he chose to run them. Even after the overthrowing of Darius III, Alexander still wanted to add more to his empire. He even went as far as India to overthrow, which only failed due to homesick soldiers. Thus, this had to be Alexander's greatest flaw, he didn't know when enough was enough. Now, back to subject at…
- 1207 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
All throughout school teachers have taught students that Alexander The Great was indeed great but, is this really true? He did conquer much land and spread greek culture throughout Europe but not many people know what he did to his men in order to do this. One way that he torched his men to get what he wants is in Document D when the man went through all that work to get him his hat back after it falling into the water than killed him. He did this because in order to get the hat back without getting wet he would have to place it on his head. Since he placed in on his head he had to get it cut off because it says “he should not allow the head that had worn the royal head band to be safe” (Document D). He did this to show the rest of his men…
- 304 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Lastly, Alexander the Great was a very wise ruler. When he conquered Persia he allowed them to continue to be ran by Persians, when he conquered a new territory he would have his men marry women from the area to spread his influence, and he would rule as if he were a god-king to the conquered peoples religions. All of these actions were very strategic and in the long run kept Alexander very successful in his ruling which earns him the status of Great.…
- 638 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I think that Alexander the Great,was a villain when his dad was alive,but when his dad died he became a hero.…
- 321 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Alexander was a great leader even though some people commonly think that he was a sword wielding tyrant. Alexander was a great leader because he respected the beliefs of other people, had a great respect for knowledge, and he was a superior strategist in battle. He was so great that he was almost able to conquer the whole known world.…
- 461 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Alexander the great is a villain not, a hero. Alexander lied,cheated,frightened,and killed in his time of rule,if he did all of these things why is he called Alexander the Great? Alexander killed millions of innocent people he also made millions of people scared of him,“In 327 BCE, with the Persian Empire firmly under his control, Alexander turned his attention to India. He had some victories before reaching the Ganges river, which he intended to cross in order to conquer more of India”.…
- 413 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Many people think Alexander the Great should be remembered as a hero while others think Alexander the Great should be remembered as a villain. He should be remembered as a hero because of his heroic actions. For example, Alexander the Great conquered Persia, Egypt, and parts of the Asia Minor. He also created one form of government for his empire. Alexander was one of the bravest emperors in the Ancient World.…
- 353 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“Alexander The Great Hero or Villain” By: Shelby Hammond-Helms I think that Alexander the Great is a hero because he had a lot of accomplishments and legacies that are important. Alexander the Great did do some bad things but most heroes do. I think that his accomplishments over ride his actions that were hurtful to other people. I think that his most important accomplishment is the Hellenistic culture. Alexander the Great founded the city Alexandria.…
- 355 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The not so great part was married to 3 women, killing most of his men, and as a theory, killing his dad too. Those things didn’t matter a lot to them though. Alexander the Great died by a fever that was never cured in June, 323 B.C.E. He was allied with many cities and conquered many cities. He took some troops on the way. He got lots of supplies to continue his journey and weapons too. Shortly before he died he was supposedly asked to whom his empire should and their answer was said “to the strongest man.” His generals fought over his land and it ended up dividing up into multiple…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
After learning about the history of Alexander’s conquest of the world and his engineering achievements from both the perspective of the conqueror and the conquered, I believe he should be remembered as a hero, because of these three reasons. The first reason is he showed respect for his enemies, next he was a brilliant commander and last but not least he invented very evolved things for his time.…
- 345 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
But Alexander the Great did things way worse than this. He conquered civilizations against their own will, he killed anyone that didn’t agree with him and anyone he thought would stand in his way. According to ALEXANDER-THE-NOT-SO-GREAT, “According to legend, when Alexander the Great saw that his empire stretched across the entire known world, he wept for there were no more kingdoms left to conquer. By the age of 30, Alexander ruled over an empire spanning three continents and covering more than two million square miles (The John Maxwell Company 1) Alexander had conquered the whole world by the time he was only 30, he passed away when he was just thirty two, murdering thousands of thousands of people. When there were no more civilizations to conquer he broke down and cried. He was a cruel killer. He wanted to murder and he had already taken over the whole known world and he wanted more. This is not a mark of someone who is a hero. A hero doesn’t kill millions of people a hero is not selfish enough to break down and cry when there was nobody else to kill. He only thought about himself since he would kill anybody that he thought might get in the way of anything he was…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
For centuries, Alexander the Great has held an eminent place in history. Arguably one of the greatest men the world has ever known, the Macedonian King accomplished many great feats in his short, but glorious life. During his reign, Alexander played several roles in the process of conquering the Persian empire, and in the assessment of his character, aspects of Alexander's capabilities of both strengths and weaknesses must be explored in him as a person, a statesman and a leader.…
- 1363 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In James Romm's edit of recollections from authors Arrian, Diodorus, Plutarch, and Quintus Curtuis of Alexander's life, we are presented the good and bad tales and parts of Alexander's life. So, James Romm presents the question: Should Alexander be considered great? Like James Romm suggests, I as a modern reader have formed my own opinions of Alexander and if he should indeed be considered "Great". In my opinion, while Alexander was a man whom had qualities that could consider him great, he continuously harmed or killed those close to him and attempted to base a civilization of hypocritical principles.…
- 1370 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Alexander the Great is renowned for uniting the known world under his leadership and has grown to mythical proportions in his leadership abilities and skill at arms. He was also a young ruler, brash, irreverent and narcissistic. His never ending lust to conquer new lands, his growing problems controlling his drinking and his relentless pushing of his army all contribute not only to illustrating personal character flaws but possibly to his death.…
- 1032 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Alexander III of Macedon, widely known as Alexander the Great, is opinioned by some people to have been a ruthless man who only had a thirst for conquest , but according to others he was a man of intellect and “statesmanlike vision” (Hammond Preface). In N.G.L. Hammond’s book The Genius of Alexander the Great, as stated in the preface, he tries to refrain from writing based on his own opinion of Alexander, and instead analyzes the few surviving narratives on Alexander’s achievements in an unbiased manner. He portrays the conquests, struggles, and greatest achievements of Alexander’s career, such as the building of his empire that stretched from the eastern Mediterranean coast through Asia Minor and the Indus Valley (Hammond Preface). Hammond’s main goal is to evaluate the life of Alexander and to write an account of him which is as close to the true facts of his profession as one can achieve. Hammond claims that Alexander did more than any other individual to shape the history of civilization, which led to the title of his book. (Hammond preface) But what was it that made Alexander the Great so ‘great’? In the early years of his life, he wanted to achieve glory and excellence, and that dream stuck with him until his death. His ability to establish his positions and to forge an empire like no other led to the creation of his legendary name.…
- 2365 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays