The author reflects on specific instances relevant to him as well as people who have shared similar experiences. He then goes on to make broader generalizations based off of the collected data. For example, in all the anecdotes, the student breaks a strong connection with either their family, peer, or loved one due to the expansion of knowledge they were exposed to. Lubrano makes the point that while college kids are off formulating their own views, their close ones are at home unable to break the mob mentality and “shared opinions” that thrives within the working class (535). Hence the change of views between family and student also thrusts the student into a state of isolation in which they become a pariah. Is this always what happens to families when a child pursues what they consider to be in their best interests? Probably not, but based on Lubrano’s use of inductive reasoning it’s likely to be the most common
The author reflects on specific instances relevant to him as well as people who have shared similar experiences. He then goes on to make broader generalizations based off of the collected data. For example, in all the anecdotes, the student breaks a strong connection with either their family, peer, or loved one due to the expansion of knowledge they were exposed to. Lubrano makes the point that while college kids are off formulating their own views, their close ones are at home unable to break the mob mentality and “shared opinions” that thrives within the working class (535). Hence the change of views between family and student also thrusts the student into a state of isolation in which they become a pariah. Is this always what happens to families when a child pursues what they consider to be in their best interests? Probably not, but based on Lubrano’s use of inductive reasoning it’s likely to be the most common