Preview

Alfred The Great Dbq

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alfred The Great Dbq
How did the rulers of early medieval Europe like Charlemagne, Otto of Saxony, Alfred the Great, and William the Conqueror set certain precedents for their emerging nations?

Well for starters, Charlemagne did bring a whole lot to the table. The only significant thing I got out of him was the fact that he split his empire into “countries”, with a total of 300 counts watching those territories. Otto brought his German self, and conquered all of the “Holy Roman Empire”. He starts the election process. Otto gets recognized by the Byzantines and Constantine, and then finally the pope recognizes him as well. That in and of its self shows that Otto was a legit ruler! Alfred has to survive in bog-like territory for a while. He was bookish,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 17th-18th century Europe, the age of absolutism, absolute monarchs ruled most of Europe in countries such as Prussia, France, and the Holy Roman Empire. Absolute monarchs are rulers that have complete control over the government and its people. They claimed to rule by “divine right,” where their authority comes from God and they were above the law. The views of being a proper role as an absolute monarch differed very much between rulers and their subjects. Certain rulers had ideas that both the people and ruler should be united, some abused their power with no sympathy towards the people they rule, and the subjects that suffered from the rulings of the monarch had a completely different perspective than the rulers that were in power.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pacific Empire Dbq

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case of the emperors, their authority had been transformed into something more ephemeral. “Emperors”, states John Larner, “when they intervened in Italy, appear as ghosts feared at first through their re-evocation of the past, yet soon mocked with the swift realisation of their impotent insubstantiality”. The empire, it seemed, was to be progressively confined only to the German lands; the emperors’ powers being checked from within by the great princes and city-states of empire, and from abroad, by the defiant will of regional kings. The authority of the other universal power, the papacy, by all appearances, was in decline also. The papacy’s sphere of influence apparently shrinking, with its attention primarily focused on France and the states of Italy. This appeared to be exacerbated by the Avignon Captivity which supposedly subjected the papacy to the will of the French monarchy. Seemingly, in the words of Joseph Strayer, the idea of the universal empires “had never been anything but a dream”. Yet, this commonly held conclusion; that fourteenth-century witnessed the final breaking of the authority of the universal powers, is questionable. As Watts explains, although few emperors invaded Italy after the 1320s, “the ideal of a universal secular prince certainly persisted”, as its jurisdictional claims “could not easily be…

    • 381 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne’s Carolingian Renaissance most important consequences was the encouragement to spread of uniform culture as well as uniform religious practices. Construction of a Christian republic was Charlemagne’s vision. Despite the fact that Charlemagne unified his handwriting, standardized coins, elevated education, empire, and even scholarly Latin. Following his death in the year 814 his Empire declined in strength within a generation or two. His rule was so brilliant, such a hard act to follow. Many emperors who followed him seemed inferior. We've seen this before with Mohammed, Alexander the Great, Justinian, Constantine, and Augustus…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alcuin and Charlemagne

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only was Charlemagne good at conquering land but he also did very well at governing the land he conquered. He was a clever ruler and knew he had to keep the nobles in his service. To do this he granted part of the royal lands as lifetime holdings to nobles who assisted him. Charlemagne also knew that he could not let the counts gain more power then him. To hold more control over his kingdom, Charlemagne required counts to serve outside their own family lands. He also sent out…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Having a strong ruler is key to a successful empire. A strong ruler is a sign of a strong empire, and if you have a weak leader who makes bad decisions when your empire will most likely crumble. Many empires such as Carolingian, the Qin Dynasty, Egypt, and so many more thrived because of their strong leaders, even if that time of prosperity doesn't always last long. One great and powerful leader that lead his empire to peace was Augustus. "The era of Augustus’ reign was a golden age in every respect. " (Augustus) A strong leader often brings prosperity which causes the citizens to be more patriotic. This patriotism helps strengthen the empire's military might because more people would be willing to fight for the empire that they…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Maple/ McBride HONR- 1114 12-09-99 By the Cross and the Sword : Charlemagne's Impact on the West. "He who ordains the fate of kingdoms in the march of the centuries, the all-powerful Disposer of events, having destroyed one extraordinary image, that of the Romans, which had, it was true, feet of iron, or even feet of clay, then raised up, among the Franks, the golden head of a second image, equally remarkable, in the person of the illustrious Charlemagne. Notker the Stammerer, the monk of St. Gall, wrote these words in AD 844 to describe the reign of the most influential Frankish king Charlemagne ( Lectures 1). Charlemagne, son of Pepin the Short, ruled the Franks for 47 years (Koeller 1). The Carolingian Dynasty, of which Charlemagne was a member, was established in AD 751 when Pepin dethroned the last Merovingian king. The Carolingians ruled a land that "spoke several different tongues, had different cultural and historical traditions, and different institutions."(Nelson 2). The great variation found in the people of the Frankish kingdom produced for Charlemagne great obstacles. Dr. Skip Knox, Professor at Boise State University argues that the "monarchy among the Franks was not equipped to deal with this situation…" (Knox 11). Attempting to establish control in his empire, Charlemagne implemented a series of programs that would produce a new form of government and would engage his court in an intellectual renaissance. Charlemagne was forced to entirely reinvent the Merovingian system of government, and to do so he "either created new offices, or adapted old ones to new purposes…" (Knox 11). He appointed dukes and counts, and appointed in the German regions of the land margraves, an office that would remain long after the time of Charlemagne. Thus, Charlemagne created a political hierarchy in which the counts would report to the dukes, and the dukes to Charlemagne himself. Charlemagne gained the loyalty and respect of his barons by…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne also knew that organization of his empire would be key to stability. He established a network of “counts” that would oversee royal estates (Text Pg. 235). He also sent emissaries, also known as “Missi Dominici,” to these royal estates to ensure they were being run properly…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne, king and later emperor of the franks, and King Louis IX of France, king, saint, and crusader, have very similar have very similar social and cultural backgrounds but…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rise Of New Monarchs

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Crusades, monarchs realized that the key to maintaining power was to gain the support of the nobility and become independent of the nobles. Leaders of New Monarchs changes how they ruled and how they saw themselves as rulers. They cared for the aspirations of the people and represented their country. Louis XI of France and Henry VII of England were two examples of New Monarchs who centralized government and contributed to the rise of their countries from the period of 1450-1550.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne wasn’t only an emperor, but also had a few other talents before being put on the throne. He ruled much of Western Europe from (768-814). His father crowned him in 800. He reigned for more than 4 decades.The Franks was a Germanic tribe…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the fall of Rome a man named Charlemagne tried to build back the empire. At the end of his life raids of people Scandinavia called Vikings started to come in and raid. This made the holy roman empire think of new ways to defend and try to keep the vikings out. These hit and run raids helped shift power to nobles and away from kings.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Looking back at history, an individual usually can find an incredible amount of information about any given period in any given part of the world. Yet as varied are the history books, so are the biases which they each present. We see one example of these biases in Einhard's The Life of Charlemagne in which this adviser and close friend to the great Frankish king gives his history of Charlemagne's life. One issue that Einhard repeatedly touches on is the virtually uninterrupted series of wars that the Frankish Kingdom under 'Charles the Great' undertook. Throughout the individual accounts of these war, Einhard attempts to justify Charlemagne's military career.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne was an important part of history. He was important because he was the grandson of Charles Martel and was King of the Franks. Also he briefly united western Europe when he built his empire. He also set up a strong government, and many rulers looked to his example to strengthen their kingdoms. Charlemagne spent most of his 46 year reign fighting Muslims in Spain. His conquest reunited much of the old western Roman empire. After Charlemagne died in 814 his son (Louis I) took over and fought for power, but it wasn’t until Charlemagne’s grandson drew up the Treaty of Verdun, and split the empire into 3 regions.…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Investiture Controversy

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Empire’s beginning started when Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne, King of the Franks at the time, emperor of the newly formed state. The prestigious title remained to the Carolingian family until around 888 A.D. and from 896 to 899. During this time of chaos, the throne was constantly contested between the various factions of what is now Italy. Many civil wars occurred until the last Italian claim was broken when Berenger died in 924 A.D. Pope John XII crowned the next king, Otto,…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Charlemagne; a great and powerful emperor, but a kind-hearted and generous man, was a leader and a friend to Christianity. Many people say that he is a man of nobility and honor. Charlemagne became the first Holy Roman Emperor known for expanding territory and power. Not only is he considered as the founding father of historical monarchies, but is also referred to as the father of Europe. His family before him had battled with the kingdom of Lombard for 3 years in the defense of the pope. After his family had died, he invaded Lombardy and declared himself king. Many people say that he is a man of nobility and honor…

    • 111 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays