In most cities, public transport is partially subsidized by the city council, which means that bus and underground fares are usually reasonably low. However, some people argue that fares should be abolished altogether . In this essay, I intend to examine the arguments for and against free public transport. One of the strongest arguments in favour of free public transport is that it would encourage more people to use the buses and tubes instead of going by car. Consequently, there would be less traffic in the roads, which would make our cities safer, cleaner and generally presenter places to live in. Another advantage is that those who are not very well off would be able to afford to go out more and would have little more money to spend, which would improve the quality of their lives. Free public transport would be a good thing for a city’s shops and businesses, as bus and underground users would have more money available to spend on both necessities and luxuries. Lastly, if passengers travel free on public transport, there would be no need for ticket officers, bus conductors or ticket inspectors. This would make the buses and underground much cheaper to run. On the other hand, there are several arguments against abolishing fares. To begin with, if there were no fares, the city council would have to find another way of financing public transport, probably by increasing the city’s rates. As a result, a lot of people who never travel by public transport would be helping to pay for a service which they do not use, which many would consider unfair and which also make these people worse off.
What is more, if the number of passengers increased dramatically because of the abolition of fares, it would probably be necessary to increase the number of buses and trains. This would make free public transport even more expensive to operate. Finally, the abolishion of fares would lead to the loss of several thousand jobs among those public transport staff who sell or inspect tickets, which is clearly undesirable in these times of high unemployment. On balance, I’m in favour of the idea of free public transport in our cities provides that alternative employment could be found for those workers whose jobs would become redundant.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
London, Birmingham, Manchester all has public transport and they are all horrendous. Don’t get me started on, if they are road works going on, strikes, and trains getting cancelled .The things which annoy me about public transport are, let’s take buses for example: Buses they are awful! On one December morning as you stand in the freezing cold as it rains and drip drop drip as the rain falls on you, your nose red as a tomato and your finger tips frozen as ice waiting for a bus, do you agree with me or not? As you just wait for the big bright lights to shine fiercely and to glow in the distance as you wait patiently. Trains are better but they still have negatives just like buses, with trains you just can’t even be a minute late because the train is just not going to wait, as you are running 100 miles per hour just like an athlete Usain Bolt as he runs like a cheetah and sprints cross the track.…
- 529 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
From a societal perspective, it is desirable for all transportation services to pay their full social…
- 9804 Words
- 40 Pages
Good Essays -
Kate Chopin’s The Storm Have you ever wanted to be with someone but it was never the right timing, but you ran into them later in life and the two of you were all alone and it was the perfect place and the perfect time. What would you do? In the story by Kate Chopin The Storm it talks about the two storms that takes place: one storm being the storm from the physical weather outside the house and the second storm, which is inside the house with two people that were married that had a thing for each other.…
- 597 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Large cities and populations rely on public transportation to reduce traffic congestion and vehicle emission as well as provide a means for citizens without personal vehicles to travel to important places like work, school or the grocery store. Critically important infrastructure to any city, without a reliable regional transportation system those who cannot afford cars are greatly impacted. Such groups may be confined to a particular neighborhood, which may result in lack of accessibility to jobs or other important resources, in modern city's neighborhoods cut off from transportation can become increasingly poor, see elevated crime rates and more likely to continue to be…
- 1509 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Public Transport is dreadful! They are always either late, delayed, having engineering work or on strike! More that half of the population in London have complained about the public transport in their area but the thing is there is nothing we can do about it. So much money is spent on the public transport, but then why is it there is so many flaws to it and its always running late?…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Public transport, nowadays, is a major focus of concern and complaint. There are, however, many steps that can be taken to improve the service.…
- 322 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Semmens, J. (2003, February 13). Public transit: A bad product at a bad price. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2003/02/public-transit-a-bad-product-at-a-bad-price…
- 3747 Words
- 15 Pages
Best Essays -
These days, more and more people are using their own cars to commute. The increasing number of vehicles in our cities contributes to the high levels of pollution in the air. When faced with taking private cars or public transport, people react in different ways. I will discuss the for and against arguments of using private cars or public transport.…
- 388 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In general, what’s the purpose of public transportation? Usually one would answer along the lines of ‘get someone from point A to point B’. Here at the University of Kansas, that revolves mostly around student life, but also includes the Lawrence general public. Busing is advertised as a great tool that students have available to them for free, both during school hours and after. However despite busing being promoted for its convenience for students, the most commonly ridden bus route (red 43) stops running at 5:30pm on weekdays, and doesn’t run at all on weekends. Few buses run on Saturdays, and absolutely no buses run on Sundays. I do not believe this is adequate. Bus times are inconvenient, and this transportation method as a whole is not prioritized correctly; I believe the busing should be extended to a much later time in the evening, as well as 7 days a week.…
- 1293 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
In conclusion, although there are some problems of using public transport, people should still take it to go to school or to travel to work, because the overall advantages of taking public transport are more than the…
- 327 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Individuals earning a higher salary than most others may opt to buy a private vehicle for many reasons which may include comfort, safety, improved time management and control. Individuals who do not fall into this salary bracket may conclude that their income simply does not provide for such costs. License fees, prices of vehicles, insurance and maintenance all seems too demanding on individuals who earn a lower income. These are the individuals who utilise the Public Transport System the most and are appreciative of it.…
- 453 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Travel is ridiculously expensive: bus train or taxi, but especially the train. As trains are used by many people for various reasons to travel: to and from work; to and from school; to and from visiting family or holidays. They are used daily, and can be used by anyone any age, to anywhere they need, and this is why trains shouldn't be so expensive.…
- 1103 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Other location such as London and Singapore, as enumerated in this article have taken measures to account for marginal costs and have been successful both in reducing traffic, road congestion and even increasing government revenue. Additional imposition of costs would bring about a smarter ways of travelling by the motorist and commuters. Instead of hurriedly going to where they are supposed to go without considering the cost of travel, an increase in amount to be paid, motorists would be think about the benefits of travelling or the gains received in that particular trip as compared to the costs to be shed in just one travel. If more motorists find the cost exceeding the benefit, then there would be lesser persons on the road for they will surely opt to…
- 756 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The rapid growth of India’s urban population has put enormous strains on all transport systems. Burgeoning travel demand far exceeds the limited supply of transport infrastructure and services. Public transport, in particular, has been completely overwhelmed. Most bus and train services are overcrowded, undependable, slow, inconvenient, uncoordinated and dangerous. Moreover, the public ownership and operation of most public transport services has greatly reduced productivity and inflated costs. India’s cities desperately need improved and expanded public transport service. Unfortunately, less government financial assistance and the complete lack of any supportive policies, such as traffic priority for buses, place public transport in an almost impossible situation. That’s why people preferring private transport facility over pubic for their convenience and safety purposes.…
- 1264 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Government Transformation Programme (GTP) is an effort by Malaysia's current Government to address seven key areas concerning the people of the country. The programme was unveiled on 28 January 2010 by the Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak. and is expected to contribute in making the country a developed and high-income nation as per its Vision 2020.…
- 1587 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays