Preview

Alternative Dispute Resolution: Analyze the Method of Alternative Dispute Resolutions

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1439 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alternative Dispute Resolution: Analyze the Method of Alternative Dispute Resolutions
The purpose of this paper is to summarize and analyze the method of alternative dispute resolutions. An outline of the various forms is provided as well as a discussion of the methods used in two dispute cases relating to a borrower and an employee. In this paper I will also discuss alternative dispute resolution methods to be used in solving disputes in the current learning team environment. “ To avoid or reduce these problems, businesses are increasingly turning to methods of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and other aids to resolving disputes” (Chessman, 201 , p. 45-46). This method of dispute resolution is not costly and does not disrupt business as usual or life as usual. Arbitration is the commonly used form of ADR. “These type of disputes fall outside of the judicial realm” (ADR, 2010). Various forms of ADR exist, such as negotiation, mediation, conciliation, mini-trial, fact-finding, and the use of a judicial referee. Following is a brief description of each form of alternative dispute resolution. • Arbitration is used to assist parties in deciding the outcome of the dispute by employing an impartial third party, called an arbitrator, who is usually a member of an association and must be qualified to hear and decide a case. • Negotiations can begin before, during , and after a lawsuit is filed. The parties negotiate with each other, but it is best to have an attorney present to assist in reaching a mutual settlement. The parties usually make offers and counteroffers and may provide additional information to help the other side reach an amicable settlement. Sometimes negotiations are mandated by the courts before they go to trial. • .Mediation is similar to negotiation. It requires an unbiased third party to assist in the settlement of a dispute. A mediator does not render a decision in the case. The mediator is the intermediary between the parties. Based on the information received from both sides, the mediator can
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 4
    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hsc300 Unit 4

    7. Dispute Resolution: Where and how disputes between parties will be resolved; with courts and arbitration will be used…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 531 Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause Paper
    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Law 531 Alternative Dispute Resolution Clause Paper

    This paper will discuss an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) clause that might be used by a Learning Team to resolve a disagreement among members. This paper will identify all provisions and information necessary to enable the ADR to occur and function effectively.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Law 531 Business Dispute Paper
    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law 531 Business Dispute Paper

    Most common forms of ADR which are available are – Negotiation (It is a simple procedure in which parties involved in dispute discuss with each other to reach a voluntary settlement.),Mediation (In this method, the parties use a mediator to propose a settlement of their dispute), Arbitration ( In it, the parties chooses a third party to hear evidence and testimony and then decide the dispute), Mini-trial (In it, lawyers from both parties present their case to representatives of each party so that parties can know strengths and weaknesses of their cases.), Fact-finding(the parties employs a neutral third party who act as fact-finder for the investigation of case and the information investigated by Fact-finder can be used in negotiating settlement.), Using a Judicial Referee (With the parties agreement, the court may appoint a judicial referee to conduct a private trial and give a judgment and their decisions stand as judgments of the court). (Cheeseman,…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bus Law 531 Week 1
    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bus Law 531 Week 1

    Business owners know that high ligation costs and lengthy delays make it difficult and expensive to resolve business disputes in court. Alternative dispute resolutions are superior solutions for resolving business disputes and are normally settled before trial, which saves significant time and money. Alternative dispute resolution can be achieved by several approaches, which may include negotiation, mediation, and arbitration. Traditional litigation resolves disputes in the civil court system in which one party loses and one wins. Although litigation and alternative disputes resolution both have advantages, alternative dispute resolution is generally faster and less expensive. This paper will compare and contrast the traditional litigation with nontraditional forms of alternative dispute resolution.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Law/531 Adr Analysis
    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Law/531 Adr Analysis

    For many years, litigation has been the one thing in reference to the law that traditionally resolves lawsuits and disputes. There are many facts that need to be considered when one compares or contrasts traditional litigation methods to the nontraditional litigation methods (Alternate Dispute Resolution). Handled outside of litigation in court, ADR is a unique resolution. ADR’s types include “arbitration, collaborative law, mediation and negotiation. Conciliation is sometimes included as a fifth category” (Alternate Dispute Resolution Law, 2011).…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Business Law 531 Alternative Dispute Resolution Paper
    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Business Law 531 Alternative Dispute Resolution Paper

    The role of the Mediator will be that of a neutral third party, who will have no long-term interest in the consequences or outcome of the dispute. His or her role will be that of a facilitator and advisor in the settlement negotiations. The Mediator may comment on issues and express his or her opinion regarding the relative strength or weakness of the parties’ positions.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LAW 531 Week 1 Alterntive Dispute Resol
    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    LAW 531 Week 1 Alterntive Dispute Resol

    Another strategies of resolutions through in the ADR process in the situation of problems in the Learning Team is the mediation. Team member with current or previous involvement in disputes are not able to intervene as arbitrator. According to "San Diego Court” (2014), Mediation is a confidential, non-binding process in which a trained mediator facilitates communication between disputants and assists parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution of all or part of their dispute. The mediator is not the decision-maker and does not resolve the dispute, the parties do. However a mediator is often able to more fully explore the parties' underlying interests, needs and priorities ("San Diego Court ", 2014). The ADR Clause is a faster process and more effective that a litigation.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Assignment 1: ADR Clause For Learning Team
    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Assignment 1: ADR Clause For Learning Team

    Mediators do not give a final verdict on the case, but only serve as a resource of understanding between both parties. In the case that there is not an agreement, the parties can look to other avenues to resolve the legal issue, whether that be another ADR option, or court. In the same manner, Arbitration also uses a third party to handle disputes. When each party agrees to arbitration, usually an expert in the field is called to facilitate the process. Their responsibility is to listen to what each side has to present, and based on the evidence and information, provide a verdict for the case. Some of these cases can be binding meaning that a decision made by the arbitrator is final. In any other instances, if the case is not binding, then either party has the right to go to court if the verdict is not satisfactory (Arbitration and mediation, n.d.). Sometimes I hybrid version of these two processes, known as Med-Arb, may be the best approach. At the beginning of the process a mediator is established, but if an agreement cannot be reached through mediation, then the mediator takes position as an arbitrator and imposes a binding decision for…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Best Essays

    Links for Business LAW
    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page

    Links for Business LAW

    Erickson, D. & Bowen, P. G. (2005/2006). Two alternatives to litigation: An introduction to arbitration and mediation. Dispute Resolution Journal, 60(4), 42-28.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Best Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 Alternative Dispute Resolution Paper
    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Law 421 Alternative Dispute Resolution Paper

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an important aspect of the court’s structure in that it allows disputes to be resolved without the need for litigation. The different types of this key alternative will be discussed along with a pros and cons of each alternative type. A personal perspective of how ADR has worked for me in the past will be included as well as what type was used.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Alternate Dispute Resolution: Advantages Of The Federal Judicial System
    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Alternate Dispute Resolution: Advantages Of The Federal Judicial System

    Alternate Dispute Resolution (ADR) offers all the advantages of the federal judicial system and then some. Along with fixed rules and the possibility of appeal, it allows for speed, confidentiality, cost efficiency, customized resolutions, and enforceability. These make ADR a good arbitration option for a whole range of complex commercial cases like securities, professional malpractice, patent litigation, personal injury litigation and bankruptcy mediation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Legal System Analysis ADR
    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Legal System Analysis ADR

    Mediation is also an informal alternative to litigation. Mediators are individuals trained in negotiations, who bring opposing parties together and attempt to work out a settlement or agreement that both parties accept or reject. Mediation is used for a wide gamut of case-types ranging from juvenile felonies to federal government negotiations with Native American Indian tribes. Mediation has also become a significant method for resolving disputes between investors and their stock brokers.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dispute Resolution Parties
    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dispute Resolution Parties

    In a traditional litigation the process is very structured. Usually a lawyer is needed to represent then the process will proceed through the judicial system. A judge and jury will render an unpredictable ruling based on the law rather than justice. An alternative dispute resolution is much more flexible. In the alternative dispute resolution parties can select a neutral decision maker with specific expertise pertaining to the dispute. The procedure and format also can be agreed upon by both parties.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Theory Dispute Resolution
    • 1954 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Theory Dispute Resolution

    Mediation is a process which allows a flexible and informal way of negotiating with the introduction of a third party which allows the discussion to run smoothly, furthermore all that is said in the mediation is confidential and anything said cannot be used in court. As this dispute has been deliberated for over half a year we believe that it is in both parties interests to get it sorted as soon as possible therefore we believe that the introduction of a third party mediator would be beneficial as he would create an appropriate environment for resolution as he encourages communication and while structuring the discussion to gain a mutual agreement. mediation will allow for the dispute to be moved along as it allows both parties to focus on bringing the argument to an end rather than continuously disputing the facts as its clear in this case that there are many situations that are unclear and do not match. As Mediation is a way of trying to get a result you have to be open and honest with what your wants and needs are as it will allow for the mediator to gain an…

    • 1954 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pepsico Internal Analysis
    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pepsico Internal Analysis

    Conflict is a normal and natural part of public planning and community life. Conflict resolution requires good faith efforts on the part of conflicting parties, as well as a neutral third party. Third party conflict resolution is any attempt by a relatively neutral person to help the parties resolve the problem they are having. In third party conflict resolution, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is a process that is designed to resolve a conflict between parties who are unable to reach an agreement. It also provides a structured, semi-formal and orderly way for people to find agreement. There are generally three types of third party conflict resolution which are arbitration, mediation and inquisition. These activities can be classified by their level of control over the process and control over the decision. For inquisition, the inquisitors have high level of process control and decision control. There are 4 steps to successfully resolve a conflict in this inquisition method which understands the conflict, communicate with the opposition, brainstorm possible resolutions and choose the best resolution. To understand a conflict, the inquisitors have to identify essential participants, afford all participants equal standing, structure sessions to encourage participation, find a neutral location for meetings, achieve consensus among participants on the agenda, find convenient times for meeting and provide sufficient time between sessions to do follow-up work and analysis. These steps are really important for the inquisitors to understand the conflict between the two parties. Managers usually adopt this method because this method has been suggested by researches because the have the power to control over the process and decision in order to solve the problem and it is consistent with the decision-oriented nature of managerial jobs. However, the inquisitional approach is the least effective. This is because the inquisitors tend to…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics