He expresses that it was often a common mistake for individuals in the past was to look that the Universe in its entirety on a human scale. The concept time and size of the Universe in relation to humans was not large enough. In theory, if one was able to accurately determine the exact clocking mechanics of the Universe, then you would be able to predict future events without error. Conversely, one could also do this in reverse to find more details about the past. Quantum physics and relativity have given this idea more intense complexities. The main issue on the scientific way of looking at the world in this way had to do with Divine actions. Divine action in the human realm had its concerns, but Plantinga was able to acknowledge this apprehension and appropriately help individuals find, “a way around this problem.” Plantinga addresses the dilemma by point out the Divine Action Project saying, “"It would be fair to say, I think, that the main problem for the project is to find an account of divine action in the world—action beyond creation and conservation—that doesn’t involve God’s intervening in the world,” and then tells people that he has no issue with the way in which God intervenes sometimes in the normal functioning of the world. With acknowledgement that others do have issues with it, explains his reasoning by observing the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber way of looking at quantum mechanics. This idea includes knowledge that there are spontaneous breaks in functions of the world. Anything is bound to happen in the world, but it is open and free in concerns to what those things are actually going to be that happen. Plantinga enriches this idea with his divine collapse-causation (DCC) model where God is able to make judgement on the final outcomes for breaks in functioning in our
He expresses that it was often a common mistake for individuals in the past was to look that the Universe in its entirety on a human scale. The concept time and size of the Universe in relation to humans was not large enough. In theory, if one was able to accurately determine the exact clocking mechanics of the Universe, then you would be able to predict future events without error. Conversely, one could also do this in reverse to find more details about the past. Quantum physics and relativity have given this idea more intense complexities. The main issue on the scientific way of looking at the world in this way had to do with Divine actions. Divine action in the human realm had its concerns, but Plantinga was able to acknowledge this apprehension and appropriately help individuals find, “a way around this problem.” Plantinga addresses the dilemma by point out the Divine Action Project saying, “"It would be fair to say, I think, that the main problem for the project is to find an account of divine action in the world—action beyond creation and conservation—that doesn’t involve God’s intervening in the world,” and then tells people that he has no issue with the way in which God intervenes sometimes in the normal functioning of the world. With acknowledgement that others do have issues with it, explains his reasoning by observing the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber way of looking at quantum mechanics. This idea includes knowledge that there are spontaneous breaks in functions of the world. Anything is bound to happen in the world, but it is open and free in concerns to what those things are actually going to be that happen. Plantinga enriches this idea with his divine collapse-causation (DCC) model where God is able to make judgement on the final outcomes for breaks in functioning in our