Preview

America Should Adopt Multilateral Foreign Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
554 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
America Should Adopt Multilateral Foreign Policy
There is no doubt that the United States is the ‘New Rome' in today's world either politically or economically. However, the world has changed through globalization and information revolution, which now reduce the power of unilateralism, or hard power consisting of military and economic power. Therefore, America should adopt multilateral foreign policy rather than following its hard power policy in order to maintain and increase its status as a superpower in today's world. The new concept of soft power, other economic superpowers, and diverse climate issues substantiate this viewpoint. To begin with, hard power such as military and economic powers has lost their strength after the end of the Cold War. A new and different concept, called the soft power is now rising. Soft power can be defined as attractiveness, the ability to attract and …show more content…
Therefore, America should abandon its current its current unilateralism and adopt multilateralism. Fro example, Japan and many Western European countries have enough strength to confront American economy and China is the new rising power which should not be neglected. If America rejects these economic strongholds, it will lose its stance among the international world. A good example of these countries' relative economic independence from America compared to the past is shown in the recent fall of the stock market. In 1929, the American stock market went bankrupt which resulted in the Great Depression and it damaged the world economy. However, even though the market drastically crashed last month and most countries were affected, more countries were able to rebounce quickly compared to 1929. This demonstrates that many nations are economically strong enough to withstand the American influence. Therefore, if America does not convert to multilateral policy, it will now be hard to have a strong stance in the world's economic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In brief, Hilary Clinton proposes that the United States should remain the central power and continue its role as the world’s indispensable country. She claims that without the central power regulating the affairs, the result will be chaos and conflict (p. 11). She expresses her plans of how to maintain the role by utilizing all levers of powers. Her approaches include the use of technology, nonproliferation, economics as well as development and human rights.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    A major debate that is being discussed both domestically and internationally is the involvement of the United States of America in international affairs. This debate includes the practicality of where the United States has intervened in foreign affairs, its right to intervene in the first place considering past mistakes and questionable leadership, and whether or not that foreign involvement is in the general public’s best interest. Obviously, the two sides of the debate refer to the ‘yes’ position, explained by Ivan Eland (as in yes, the United States should limit it’s global involvement) and also the ‘no’ position, backed by President Barack Obama (as in no, the United States should not limit it’s foreign involvement). Eland’s basis for his argument is that the United States has habitually overspent it’s treasure and overextended it’s military power to a point where we cannot keep pace economically and which could bring upon the demise of the American government as we know it. He also points out that continued foreign endeavors increases the risk of the United States being a target for terrorist attack. Obama’s vision is that The United States of America needs to re-establish its place as a world leader by maintaining an active foreign policy. Obama admits that mistakes have been made where international affairs are concerned, but that is a reason to fix those mistakes and step up as a suitable leader once more. Discussed later in the paper is my own point of view, which supports President Barack Obama and his plan for active engagement in foreign affairs, in a conservative and confidant manner.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late nineteenth-century and into the early twentieth-century, the United States was a budding power looking to breakthrough and become one of the leading forces in the economic spheres of the world. The Imperialist Era fostered that transition; Uncle Sam sought out more territories in places that the US had not interfered with before. This encroachment saw new policies, laws, and ideals being created to better handle foreign policy. The change of America’s influence in the world derived from expansionism to a much larger extent than the sustentation of continuity. As a result of this, the country saw a shift away from the following of previously conventional ideologies and towards an evolution in America’s developing role in the world.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The whole world is affected by The United States' inability to restrain themselves in the meddling with other countries' affairs. After the time of World War II, the United States has been going into other countries, in attempt to fix their conflicts. Not only is everyone else affected by these acts, but the Untied States itself is affected as well. An anonymous user on Debate.org stated that, "If we keep what we have here, we can work out our national debt and we can become more of what we were in past years." They go on to mention how we could make our own higher quality products instead of importing them from other countries. The cost of going to war, or giving third world countries money that the United States is barrowing ends up being mind boggling. If the United States would just stay within their own borders, then it could address the current issues they have inside of their own country. The main issue that needs attention is the economical debt.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Donnelly (2005, p.29) stated ‘Realist theory is the oldest and most frequently adopted theory of international relations.’ Most realist work since the 1970’s has been relatively structural, largely as a result from the influence of Waltz’s ‘theory of international politics’ (Donnelly, 2005, p.35) When it comes to structural realists, there is a significant divide, disputing the underlying question, how much power is enough? Defensive realists like Kenneth Waltz (1979) maintain that it is unwise for states to try to maximize their share of world power, because the system will punish them if they attempt to gain too much power. The pursuit of hegemony, they argue, is especially reckless. Offensive realists like John Mearsheimer (2001) take the opposite view; they maintain that it makes good strategic sense for states to gain as much power as possible and, if the circumstances are right, to pursue hegemony. With the demise of the ‘Soviet threat’, a world no longer divided along strategic bipolar lines has been formed. (Lazar and Lazar, 2006) After collapsing the Soviet Union, it can be said America articulated unipolar global hegemony. Conversely, many economists have predicted a change in the balance of power with the rise of China increasing. It would seem the world is gravitating towards multipolar centres of power. Furthermore, an article in The Economist (2011) predicted China to be the global economic superpower by 2030. With the threat of China’s growth being a potential danger for US hegemony, the question arises to which structural realist theory offers the best guide to US policy makers; Waltz’s defensive realism or Mearsheimer’s offensive realism?…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some critics (Palmar, 2010; Lagon, 2011) dislike Barak Obama’s policy decisions. They argue that Obama mostly was using hard power politics. Their arguments include: 1) increased amount of US troops in Afghanistan by 35000 soldiers, 2) unmanned drones used against terrorists, 3) failure to close Guantánamo, and 4) killing Osama bin Laden. For this reason, critics point out that even if Obama speaks in the language of soft power, his actions are of hard power (Hallams, 2011). As a counterargument to this statement, it is worth analyzing President’s speech at Oslo in 2009, where Obama mentioned that soft power and diplomacy are crucially important but not everything may be solved or achieved through them. So here are the limits of soft power.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is the Usa Still a Hegemon

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the end of the cold war it has been suggested that a unipolar world order has emerged in which the USA acts as the world’s hegemonic power. A superpower is a state which dominates in four axes; politically, military, economy and culturally and has hegemonic power. Hegemony is leadership or dominance by one single state.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    States have long sought to use a broad range of tools to achieve their foreign policy goals and thus reinforce their international position. This can lead to conflicts with its neighbours and competitors on a local or even global scale, creating a negative or positive image of the country abroad. In the late twentieth century American political scientist Joseph Nye divided states influence and use of power into two categories: Hard Power (HP) and Soft Power (SP). HP is the ability to achieve foreign policy interests through military and economic power; while SP is the ability of a state to engage and achieve its objectives through influencing culture, social and political values. SP is the- “….the ability to do that by attraction and persuasion rather than by coercion." .…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bhagwati, J. 1990, 'Aggressive Unilateralism ', in Aggressive Unilateralism: America 's 301 Trade Policy and the World Trading System, University of Michigan, pp. 1-45.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Realism has dominated the study of international relations over the past fifty years. It defines power in terms of military capabilities of states. It also adheres state, self help and survival as its key assumptions. Moreover, it believes that anarchy, where there is no legitimate authority other than the state, is the only way forward in international politics. In addition to that, according to Mearsheimer, 2006, realists believe that power is the currency of international politics. Great powers, the main actors in the realists’ account, pay careful attention to how much economic and military power they have relative to each other. It is important…

    • 2530 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    070707 Zhao Riseofchindia

    • 6128 Words
    • 18 Pages

    challenge the US dominance on the other. This is what the US global strategy is…

    • 6128 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bipolar World

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “Policy proceeds by limitation of the other power, with occasional attempts to outflank.” A super power never escapes calculation in terms of international balance and always evaluates the other power’s reaction. By asserting the interests of the two great powers…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, there is a growing uncertainty about the future of the global economic order after the financial crisis of US in 2008 and Europe in 2010. The reasons from these two crisis may vary, but these brought into question the legitimacy and sustainability of the global economic order dominated by the western leading countries after the Second World War. The skepticism about western's political and economic leadership is based on the prospect that the economic hegemony may move rapidly from the United States and Europe to China and emerging Asia market after those two global crisis. Also, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), terrorism, climate change, and economic imbalances between the rich country and the poor country are all issues that great powers alone cannot resolve.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So far as the "soft power" is concerned it was first defined in 1990 by J. Nye. According to Ney, «soft power is the ability to affect others to obtain the outcomes one wants through attraction rather than coercion or payment. A country's soft power rests on its resources of culture, values, and policies»[3].…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The present day unipolar system has left USA as the only super power capable of conducting or organizing political military action anywhere in the world..However, hegemony is present in a system where there is a unipolar structure of influence to match the unipolar structure capabilities for example in the 1990s the United Nations was gradually displaced from its primary responsibility for maintaining peace and security in favour of a revitalized NATO which provided the multilateral cover for US military action in the Balkans. In the war aganst Iraq, the process was taken a step further as NATO was itself sidelined in favour of a coalition of the willing(Bull,2000;23).…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays