Donald J. Trump is widely known around the nation for being one of the most successful business men in the entire country but more commonly known for being the 45th president of the United States. But Trump did not get to these positions of wealth and power on his own for he had much help with extraordinary opportunities to help lead him to his success in the business world and the political world.…
In Torey Hayden's book, One Child, I met a child named Sheila. Sheila was a sad, abused, emotionally disturbed, and broken little girl. Six year old Sheila was headed for an empty life with a future in a state mental institution when she landed, by chance, in Torey Hayden's special education class. Sheila was headed for the mental institution as a last resort. She had been in and out of placement in schools, and had made no improvement.…
They effectively state “The drone strikes are counterproductive because they gave rise to a desire, particularly among young men, to seek revenge for the drone strikes, thus radicalizing a new generation”. This statement shows how these drone attacks by the U.S. bring about a worse kind effect than any other, a rise in hatred towards the U.S. in the future leaders of Pakistan. Even if the hate from future generations establishes itself, the U.S. is doing what it believes is the best way to protect its people now and has stated plans to help Pakistan in the future in hope of reconciling the damages they are causing now. As Zeese and Flowers continue to describe the destruction that drones cause, eventually drones will be used more and more, causing their effectiveness to increase and eventually cause less destruction. Though the people of Pakistan would rather have less damage now, the damage caused by drones is very little in comparison to ground troops. In recent reports, many causalities and confrontations were caused by the U.S. troops and the many firefights with terrorists that pop out during their patrols. The drones on the other hand, cause less confrontation and can lead into less overall deaths in both civilians and troops…
“A terrorist is one who sows terror,” says Elshtain. She means that the victims of terrorist attacks are subjected to terror, or great fear. The purpose of subjecting a group of people to such fear varies but usually aims to destroy the morale of a people in its attempt at some religious, political, or ideological goal. Crucial features of inducing terror are its randomness and its attack on civilians as opposed to combatants. This elicits fear in every person because they are afraid for their personal safety in their day to day lives, as opposed to fearing only for our soldiers. To determine who is a terrorist, we must ask who they are attacking. Do they mainly target combatants in the field or bases, do they try to destroy military equipment and are they open to negotiations? If so, we should not label them terrorists for simply being enemy combatants. However, if they are deliberately targeting noncombatants with the intention of killing as many civilians as possible, they are clearly terrorists.…
The War on Terror is tough to define. It is considered a war, but not in the traditional sense. When one thinks of war they think of enemies, a battlefield, weapons, and death. However, the war on terror is slightly different. The lines that define enemies and allies are blurred, there is no battlefield, and the weapons come in all shapes and sizes. Nonetheless, there has still been death.…
In recent headlines a drone strike in North Waziristan (near the afghan border) killed sixteen Taliban militants. In a report later published by “Dawn” an English language newspaper in Pakistan the drone launched a second strike on the camp while rescuers were trying to save any survivors. While it is not known whether the rescuers were hostile or not the CIA launched the second missile and killed three of the search team members. This apparent collateral damage happened in the wake of CNN publishing an article on the recent decrease in civilian casualties during drone strikes. After hearing about this I researched the percentage of deaths (militant and civilian) in Pakistan, the number was eye opening a staggering sixteen percent of people killed during drone strikes in Pakistan were non-combatants. To me this means that the US and NATO have “murdered” hundreds of civilians for the “greater…
Researcher, 23, 885-908. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com.ezproxy.bu.edu/cqresearcher/ Micah Zenko, "Transferring CIA Drone Strikes to the Pentagon," cfr.org, Apr. 2013 “NOVA: Rise of the Drones,” pbs.org, last modified January 23 2013, http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/military/rise-of-the-drones.html. Pew Research Center, "Global Attitudes Project," pewglobal.org, July 18, 2013 Philip Alston, "Study on Targeted Killings," Report of the Human Rights Council, Fourteenth Session, Agenda Item 3, May 28, 2010 Reaching Critical Will http://www.reachingcriticalwill.org/resources/fact-sheets/critical-issues/6737-drones Reuters, "Pakistan: Drone Strikes Are Violations of Sovereignty," huffingtonpost.com, June 4, 2012 Ritka, Singh, "A Meta-Study of Drone Strike Casualties," lawfareblog.com, July 22, 2013…
Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…
During the Cold War, and a bit after, the enemy to the United States was very clear, it was Russia and everything associated with “communism”. In the time following the Cold War, the focus of the United States has shifted significantly, and it will continue to do so. The enemy is no longer as easily targetable, it has become a guerilla type fighting force, with more intricacies than we have ever faced in the past. We have arguably had more technological growth in the last 30 years than we have in any short amount of time in the history of mankind. The growth has made intelligence collection, while more streamlined and faster, also exponentially more difficult. In the coming years, the United States will continue to focus on terrorism and everything…
Presently, one of the argumentation for drones are its cause and effect, and one being how many civilians actually end up becoming terrorists after an attack (Drones-procon.org). Jeremy Scahill, an author, states, “ The vast majority of militants operating in Yemen today is "people who are aggrieved by attacks on their homes that forced them to go out and fight". As can be seen, our drone intrusions are destroying people's homes and families, that their hatred towards the U.S. is completely justifiable. Ordinarily speaking the United States are killing fewer terrorists than they are fabricating, and only producing motivation for multiple bombings as well as killings in response…
During this last election cycle, anytime one would turn on any news they would hear a new story of the growing tensions between the opposing sides. This growing tension did not only apply to tension growing between the two major political parties but to the opposing sides taken on social injustice issues happening all over the country, i.e. police brutality, sexual and gender equality, and religious tolerance. This ever growing tension has caused numerous athletes throughout the world of sports entertainment to take it upon themselves to use their platform as a device to shed more light as well as show their support for different movements to combat the ever-growing social injustices seen throughout the news. These actions have sparked a debate on whether athletes have the freedom to take a political stand on social issues such as race and/or gender issues within…
Branded the “War on Terror,” the Bush administration started drone warfare after the attacks made by al-Qaeda on September 11thin which he inherently legalized political assassinations; however, to call the pursuit of al-Qaeda a war would be inaccurate. Sir Christopher Greenwood, the British judge on the International Court of Justice, has written: “…there is no basis for speaking of a war on al-Qaeda or any other terrorist group, for such a group… is merely a band of criminals, and to treat it as anything else risks… giving that group a status which to some implies a degree of legitimacy.”1 Unlike the U.S. role in World War I&II which was against standing countries, this declaration of war against a simple group has done nothing but bolster its’ status…
I was quite saddened by the event that took place on September 11, 2001. An unfortunate tragedy occurred in New York that will go down in history. Two airplanes crashed into the World Trade Center, causing them to collapse, injuring and killing thousands of people.…
Beginning in 2001 after 9-11, America has been in a war on terrorism. Originally, we were fighting a terrorist group called Al Qaeda. That war pretty much ended after we killed their leader Osama Bin Laden. Unfortunately, The war on terrorism did not end there. After Al Qaeda was defeated another terrorist organization named ISIS was born.…
What is the price of freedom? To the United States, it is protecting its borders from threats foreign and domestic with as little casualties as possible. The United States military has been using a method that reduces threats and minimizes American casualties to virtually zero. Since 2004, American forces have been using new technology in drone warfare to eliminate believed terrorists with unmanned aircrafts in Pakistan. It seems like there can only be positives for the world with terrorists dying and no human cost. Drone use does have its negatives and one major downfall is the human cost. The use of drones has taken a toll on the people of Pakistan physically and mentally. Many innocent people have been affected, hurt, and even killed from U.S. drones. The United States believes it is protecting their people but in turn can be creating more hatred and future terrorism by the prominent use of drone warfare.…