Euthanasia, the ‘mercy killing’, has definitely been one of the most difficult ethical dilemmas. Euthanasia is defined “an action or an omission, aimed at and causally implicated in, the death of another for her/his own sake” (Foot, 1997, as cited in Robert, 2004, p. 145). Euthanasia differs from murder, because the action causing the death is for the sake of the person to be killed. Someone might say that the person wanted to die anyway, so why ending his or her lives can be wrong? Is active euthanasia –acting to end the life of another- ever a right moral action? It is not an easy debate whether it is right or wrong to help end someone’s life. Some people might argue that active euthanasia is morally wrong, because there is no objective measure of suffering (Robert, 2004). It can, however, be said that active euthanasia can also be justifiable, because it is to end the person’s misery. The purpose of this paper is to debate whether active euthanasia is ever permissible. This will be accomplished by analyzing the case study: “Active Euthanasia with Parental Consent” (Robert, 2004, p. 153) and providing the best possible moral resolution. The paper will then discuss conclusion.…
The issue concerning assisted suicide is an extensively debated ethical affair. The debate stems from different viewpoints first concerning when the act is considered appropriate and then what the resulting consequences would look like if the act were permissible (Lo, 2005). Ethical decisions in assisted suicide are debated along the lines concerned with the worthy nature of life and on what is entailed in a life that is worth living and consequently, who ultimately decides this. Many religions, however, hold that life is Gods’ gift, which should not be interfered with let alone be destroyed (Lo, 2005).…
Different people, operating under different viewpoints, maintain diverse beliefs regarding the issue of euthanasia. While some, such as the Buddhists, have more fluid beliefs toward medically-assisted death, others, such as the Catholics, remain firmly opposed. Personally, I agree with the Catholic Church’s perspective on euthanasia. While I know I am not in the position to preach understanding of the pains associated with certain terminal illnesses, I firmly believe that all life, even a life of suffering, is precious and purposeful. As humans are not the true origin of life, neither should we choose when to end our lives. Buddhism suggests that one can become enlightened enough to choose to end their life, but as we were never involved in our initial creation, such enlightenment would be impossible. Patients such as Brittany Maynard seek to end their lives with dignity, as opposed to dying in pain and agony, but death is not meant to be dignified. As our life on earth ends, we should be humbled and fully realize our dependence on God. While I remain open-minded to the reasoning behind euthanasia, my current perspective does not morally support…
The debate around euthanasia is a tricky topic from the perspective of both patients and doctors. Should it be allowed, and if so, when is it appropriate to practice? Should doctors be held to moral standards when practicing euthanasia, and if so, which ones? Is killing a patient any different than letting a patient die? Daniel Callahan has responded to philosophers such as James Rachels in his article, “When Self-Determination Runs Amok,” and insists that recognizing the moral distinction between killing and letting die is crucial in evaluating whether euthanasia is permissible. Callahan discusses how euthanasia should not be permitted under any circumstances based on three important turning…
Some religious people are against euthanasia because they believe its against the will and word of God who created us and they believe that he should be the one to destroy us. Secondly euthanasia weakens society’s respect for the sanctity of life. Another reason which religious people are against euthanasia is because they believe that Voluntary euthanasia is the start of a slippery slope that might leads to involuntary euthanasia and the killing of people who are thought undesirable…
“The Yellow Wallpaper” written by Charlotte Perkins Gilman is a story that can be reviewed in a feminist lens. The Yellow Wallpaper paints a picture of a woman’s place in 1911, and how she was treated with her Postpartum Depression. She was locked in a room by her husband John which leads her to insanity because she never got the treatment she needed. The theme of feminism is very clear through John the protagonist’s husband, the thoughts of Jane and the environment in which the woman is forcefully placed. Combined, all these describe the imprisonment of woman and the power in which men had over them.…
The Right to die is a highly debatable and argumentative subject at present surrounded by controversy and dilemma requiring public attention. For years, arguments among different doctrines and viewpoint in regards to ones “right to die” have public opinion beginning to move away from modern medicine, back to the historical arguments on euthanasia: to avoid suffering the dying person has the right to end their life by another if that is necessary. Our society is at war in arguing to protect life no matter what the circumstance and fighting for the rights of an individual who is unable to communicate if he or she wants to continue living. Laws are being purposed to help protect people in a controversy position and protecting their rights. The medical end finds physicians and families at odds with these governmental laws when faced with a decision under certain circumstances. The purpose of this paper will review the issues of the “right to die” that are hot topics among the medical community which include: ethical dilemmas, individual rights, and society efforts to keep the law supporting the needs of the many.…
Euthanasia is the intentional killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. It can be separated into two distinct categories, voluntary and non-voluntary (voluntary being when the person has asked for their life to be ended and involuntary when the person has given no consent). Euthanasia has been subject to much moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate across the world. There are multiple viewpoints in regard to the legality and morality of this practice therefore defining it as an ethical issue, however most of the world have rendered it illegal in their respective countries, with the exception of the Benelux Nations (Belgium, The Netherlands and Luxembourg).…
Euthanasia is derived from a Greek term meaning “good death”. It is the painless killing of a patient who is suffering. A couple of examples of suffering can be the result of a painful disease or in an irreversible coma. In most countries, euthanasia is illegal. Only three states in the United States allow euthanasia. These three states are Oregon, Washington, and Montana. Individuals with a severe debilitating or terminal medical illness should be allowed the option for doctor assistance suicide or voluntary euthanasia.…
The concept of intentionally ending a life through assisted suicide or euthanasia is a controversial topic. There are many moral, practical, and religious arguments either for or against these acts, making it difficult to find any easy answers to these issues. There are a variety of perspectives on euthanasia and assisted suicide that have developed and have been put into policies in some states or countries. This paper will explore what is meant by euthanasia and assisted suicide, some of the arguments for and against intentionally ending a life, and my own values and beliefs surrounding these issues.…
The word “Euthanasia” deprives from the Greek word, Euthanatos. It comes from two Greek words: “Eu” which means good and “Thanatos” which means death. Literally meaning “good death”, it’s used when a patient or someone in the patient’s family makes the decision on whether or not they want to continue living. This decision usually comes up when the patient has an incurable illness or disease and the known outcome is death. Euthanasia, a controversial medical practice, has been an issue for people who are either pro or anti-Euthanasia. Citizens who are pro-euthanasia feel that it’s the patients’ decision on having a dignifying death, while anti-Euthanasia protesters feel the practice is a cop-out to doctors not doing their job. Euthanasia is a medical decision that is helpful to patients, their family and their doctors because it’s their right to what they want to do with their life, regulating euthanasia, ends pain and suffering and saves money in the process.…
This study attempts to seek the core meaning of euthanasia (mercy killing), its application, how it can be beneficial to the society, its unconstructive effects, the stand of the church and its significance. Euthanasia has been largely affected by criticisms both from the field of medicine, religion, and law. In this study, the researchers shall identify those facts that govern the instances where in these fields interplay with each other to the various topics related to euthanasia and to its development.…
One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…
Euthanasia is the assisted killing of a person. It is a widely talked about issue in today’s and has implications socially and politically. Essentially, euthanasia is used to put a person out of their suffering. Catholics do not believe in the use of Euthanasia as they do not believe in the concept of ‘playing God’, they believe God put everyone on the earth for a reason and has a plan for each person. Whereas a majority of secular humanists believe that Euthanasia is acceptable as they do not believe in a higher power, and believe that each person should be able to account for themselves. These controversial views have sparked a re-occurring up roar in the media about whether Euthanasia should be legalised or not.…
End of life decisions such as euthanasia and assisted suicide are complex social phenomena as well a public health issue of matter of concern. In moral terms it is an issue that depends on many variables such as culture, age and living conditions. In economy terms, it is a cost to society and health care system that perhaps needs to be addressed. Historically, ethical debates concerning euthanasia and assisted suicide date from ancient Greece and Rome, according with Doctor Ezekiel J. (1987), Samuel Williams first proposed using anesthetics and morphine to intentionally end a patient 's life. In my opinion, the end of life issues are a major concern to society, politics and the health system; the arguments for and…