Preview

An Autocratic Leadership Style

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Autocratic Leadership Style
Autocratic Leadership Style

1. Introduction

1.1 OBJECTIVE:-

Autocratic leadership, also known as authoritarian leadership, is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group. The objective of doing this project is to understand
Autocratic Leadership Style in detail.

1.2 TITLE OF THE PROJECT:-
The title of the project is Autocratic Leadership Style
Autocratic describes a way of ruling, but not in a nice way. An autocratic leader is one who rules with an iron fist; in other words — someone with the behaviour of a dictator.
In an autocratic leadership style, the person in charge has total authority and control over decision making. By virtue of their position and job responsibilities, they not only control the efforts of the team, but monitor them for completion –often under close scrutiny
This style is reminiscent of the earliest tribes and empires. Obviously, our historical movement toward democracy brings a negative connotation to autocracy, but in some situations, it is the most appropriate type of leadership. That, of course, doesn’t mean a blank check to ignore the wellbeing of his subordinate.
In an autocratic leadership style, the person in charge has total authority and control over decision making. By virtue of their position and job responsibilities, they not only control the efforts of the team, but monitor them for completion –often under close scrutiny
This style is reminiscent of the earliest tribes and empires. Obviously, our historical movement toward democracy brings a negative connotation to autocracy, but in some situations, it is the most appropriate type of leadership. That, of course, doesn’t mean a blank check to ignore the wellbeing of his subordinate.

1.2 LAYOUT

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This article is really enlightening on the way autocratic managers affect their subordinates. I was always under the impression that even though an autocratic leader may be frustrating, they are at least very effective. This article shows that they can be for a while but it brings into perspective the underlying prey-predator relationship between the autocratic manager and his subordinates and how that can tear…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An authoritarian leadership is when a leader tells you what they want you to do and you have to do it there and then without arguing. For example, in the Army when you are fighting on the front line and the sergeant tells you to get down you have to so that you don’t get shot.…

    • 3008 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In some cultures, especially in Asian cultures, people usually view themselves as followers and not as competitive as Western cultures  prefer autocratic leadership…

    • 961 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leo1 Week 4 Paper

    • 4436 Words
    • 18 Pages

    LO 1.2: Explain of the relation between an organization’s structure and culture can impact on the performance of the business:…

    • 4436 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    | Is a leadership style characterized by individual control over all decisions and little input from group members. Autocratic leaders typically make choices based on their own ideas and judgments and rarely accept advice from followers. Autocratic leadership involves absolute, authoritarian control over a group.…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Authoritarian leader makes quick, clear and precise independent decisions without any input. Even if there was, it wouldn’t affect the overall decision making as it needs to be decided quickly. The appropriate leader that would use the common traits of an authoritarian leader would be an officer in the army because usually they are loud and demanding.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hcs 220

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leadership can be formal or informal. Formal leadership can depend on the personal skills of an individual or be reinforcing by authority and position. Informal leadership can be expressive in an individual who does not have a specified management role (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). Both roles are important to any organization that wants to form a good organizational culture and foundation. Sullivan & Decker (2009), address four leadership styles authoritarian, democratic, permissive, and bureaucratic, which have their strengths and weaknesses. Authoritarian has the leadership characteristics of using directive behavior and strives on goal accomplishments rather than relationships. Democratic has the leadership characteristics opposite of authoritarian as this individual has concerns with building relationship and strives for open communication (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). This provides teams to collaborate effectively with team satisfaction. Permissive leaders tend not to have a good foundation of established policies and works off impulses. The bureaucratic style of leadership lacks security and depends solely on the rules and polices set (Sullivan & Decker, 2009). This individual avoids decision-making and “exercises power by applying fixed, relatively inflexible rules” (Sullivan & Decker, 2009).Through the review of this paper it will explain the leadership style of democratic and authoritarian as they are applied to Pat DeCesare in her successful leadership role. Pat has been in management for over 30 years and has a successful track record of taking her departments to the next level.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Autocratic Leadership

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Thus, leaders feel that the best way to conduct their job is to practice different style whichever suits the best to the situation. thus a leader may use transactional leadership style, autocratic leadership style, laissez faire leadership style, participative leadership style, transformational leadership style etc. while practicing the style of autocratic leadership style, the leader would make all the decisions by himself, build strict guidelines which is to be followed by all the employees, having centralized power and authority etc. the leader using bureaucratic leadership style would have strict guidelines for everything while and would want all the activities to go as per the guidelines and may be lacking in flexibility and creativity in operations. A leader practicing charismatic style of leadership or transformational leadership style would be constantly offering inspiration and enthusiasm to its employees and gain high level of commitment from the employees towards the jobs and roles of the organization. A leader using participative style of leadership would be continuously engaging employees to discuss and participate in decision making in taking actions for long term and short term while using their suggestions to form the policies and in building the strategies of the future. A leader who…

    • 2326 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public Services

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Saddam Hussein is a very good example of an autocratic leader as people never questioned and did exactly what he said.…

    • 2846 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Van Vugt, M., Jepson, S. F., Hart, C. M., & De Cremer, D. (2004). Autocratic leadership in social dilemmas: A threat to group stability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(1), 1-13.Figure 1 : Hill, Linda A., and Mark Rennella. "Johannes Linden: Managing the Global Executive Committee." Harvard Business School.. Brief Case 913-509, July 2012.…

    • 3274 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the course of the century, many individuals have had the opportunity to hold the mantle and lead large groups of people, but only a select few of these groups, be it countries or organizations, have grown to their pinnacle. This underlying fact is due to the nature and methods these various leaders chose to employ. After successfully completing leadership1, I have learnt about various leaders and how their unique leadership styles were able to affect the people were placed in charge off. Each story line spoke about the same message, good leadership benefits all and negative leadership only pleases the minority and has a detrimental effect on the majority.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    understanding leadership

    • 2750 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Authoritative leader will give clear instructions and directions on what needs doing and how it should be done. They have to have integrity and be dependable as team will look towards them to make fair decisions. These leaders supervise team activity but at the same time keep the team informed by using a variety of channels of communications. There is no feedback given in this style. Setting tasks and allocating roles and responsibilities.…

    • 2750 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tHE POWER OF ONE

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To begin with, we have to understand that leadership, at its core, is all about power and influence. Power is something most people strive to get; nobody can deny the power of language. Leaders use their power to get things done. A simple distinction is between two forms of power. Socialized power, that is power used to benefit others. The other form of power is called personalized power, and it corresponds to using power for personal gain. It is very important to note that these two forms of power are not mutually exclusive. A leader can use his power to benefit others, but can also use it to benefit himself. The obvious problem is when personalized power dominates, often at the followers' expense.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autocratic leaders also known as strict authoritarian leader do not consult with the workforce and take all responsibilities themselves, they wield a great deal of power and control over their team members . This style is used in situations were very tight deadlines and budgets have to be met and decisions have to be made quickly. Team members would be of the type X…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics