Preview

An Eye for an Eye Will Make the Whole World Go Blind.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Eye for an Eye Will Make the Whole World Go Blind.
Mohandas Gandhi, the father of non-violent resistance in the modern age, believes the world should stand up for what is right in a peaceful way; leading to the creation of his philosophy discouraging revenge—“an eye for an eye will make the whole world go blind.” He tries to simply convey that vengeance will eventually spiral out of control and wipe out everybody because revenge does not terminate a conflict, rather, instigates further brutality amongst more people, leaving the “whole world…blind.” Gandhi’s theory has influenced many people, most notably, Martin Luther King, Jr., to respond to controversial matters passively. However, the theory of the world becoming “blind” due to revenge is flawed, regarding justice. The metaphor implies that retribution as means of justice is fundamentally catastrophic. Humans should do what is right no matter what to create a world where plotting for revenge does not exist; like in the Bible, “Be compassionate as your Father is compassionate. Do not judge and you will not be judged.” (Luke 6:36-38) Using punishment as a way of dealing with things is seen as the opposite of the solution. For instance, Osama Bin Laden and his followers, known as terrorists, have used violence to solve his belief of oppression on Muslims by the U.S foreign policy which concluded in thousands of deaths in the 9-11 attacks which included his own followers and his death in 2011. The terrorists who followed Bin Laden, blinded by hatred and misleading beliefs from Bin Laden, went as far as self-sacrifice as an attempt to make change instead of trying to reason with words and nonviolent actions; something Gandhi wanted to accomplish. Although Gandhi may not have influenced everyone, he did accomplish spreading his theory of nonviolence to Martin Luther King, Jr., another successful rights activist that permanently changed the way the world viewed segregation, who stated, “Nonviolence is the answer to the crucial political and moral questions of our

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The best to illustrate the courage in terms of the quality of mind or spirit without violence is Mohanads Karmachand Ghandi is often referred to as Mahatma or the "Great Soul", was the pre-eminent political and ideological leader of India during the Indian independence movement. A pioneer of satyagraha, or resistance to tyranny through mass civil disobedience—a philosophy firmly founded upon ahimsa, or total nonviolence, he was quoted as saying: An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.", "There are many causes that I am prepared to die for but no causes that I am prepared to kill for." Ghandi led India to independence and inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. He achieved the independence for his country through the courage of his mind and his spirit without violence (Mohanads, 1949).…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    GKE1 Task 2

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages

    There have been many individuals throughout history that have left an indelible impact on their people and the world, but few could rival the difference that Mohandas Gandhi made. Gandhi was born on October 2, 1869 in the British Common Wealth of India. He spent his youth witnessing the injustices that the English purveyed on the Indian people; something that eventually helped him to decide to become a barrister. Shortly after passing the bar, Gandhi was offered a case in South Africa that would require him to live in that country for about 1 year and he readily accepted. Once arriving in South Africa, he almost immediately experienced the prejudice that Indians living there had been enduring. The turning point for him came when he purchased a first class train ticket but was asked to move to the 3rd class coach, simply because he was Indian. When he quietly refused, he was physically thrown from the train. It was at that point that he decided to stay in South Africa to fight discrimination and what had been planned as a 1 year stay turned into 20 years. During that time he created, taught and practiced the concept of satyagraha, a non-violent way of protesting against injustices. (Rosenberg, n.d.) Gandhi believed that freedom could not be taken but must be given willingly and that this concept helped both the oppressor and the oppressed recognize the humanity in each other. The idea of satyagraha would be used by many great civil rights leaders as a way to advance their causes. Because of this, it remains Gahndhi’s greatest contribution to political change.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taking revenge is like stepping onto God’s territory. We take matters into our own hand without thinking that it is HE who should play judge and the avenger of our lives.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    That just the strong could effectively depend on peaceful means as a device to challenge the current business as usual or to adjust the disequilibrium that penetrates the social and the political fabrics of human attempts. Composing on peacefulness resistance, Ravinda Kumar declares that peaceful noncooperation is a "capable, respectable, commendable and successful technique or intends to accord meet equity and flexibility" To Kumar, the Gandhian system for peaceful activity worries about all individuals, important, viable and kind. Kumar contends that peaceful activities are consolidated in them with "soaked up profound quality and morals". That a resort to peaceful procedures to determine clashes in the public arena exhibits unreasonable respectability by the person who hones it, and along these lines it additionally highlights practicability and validity. Citing Martin Luther King in his work, Kumar composed that "the strategies for peaceful resistance are the most intense weapon accessible to the general population in their battle for equity and human pride. In a genuine sense, Mahatma Gandhi typified in his life certain general rule that are intrinsic in the ethical structure of the universe. These standards are as unpreventable as the law of attractive energy". Additionally Kokila Shan contends that since…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    All it takes is one act of courage and act of caring. There is no important thing in life that people can achieve overnight. Gandhi explains that the force is destructive: “Violence like water, when it has an outlet, rushes forward furiously with an overwhelming force.” Violence leads people to more violence and destroys the moral laws of human beings. Violence leads people to commend the murder, injury, and other crimes which are against humanity. It is also the main cause of conflict within families, societies, and whole nations. Therefore, Gandhi’s writing on non- violence is only the path to change the violent into peaceful and progressive human beings.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The renowned Martin Luther King Jr know for being a social activist on the matter of equality of all races and ethnicities exclaims that, “The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people”. Through Martin Luther King Jr, one can presume that notion of oppression causes a society without tolerance and ethical diversity. Power is a quality desired by every human being, some people crave the notion of complete and utter dominance over any human being it is a sense of control that gives them a certainty of confront that no other desire can live up to it, the desire of power goes as far as committing atrocities such as murder, genocides and wars to gain absolute control over one…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Justice isn't really about “getting even” or experiencing joy in retaliation, rather it is about righting a wrong that society would agree is morally culpable. Revenge possesses a selfish quality: arrogance, vindication, ruthlessness. Revenge shall not be confused with justice; however, societal standards have allowed these two to become false inverses. As seen in numerous novels, poems and theatrical productions, characters interpret justice as revenge and revenge as justice— so does society.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thanissaro Bhikkhu "Non-violence: A Study Guide" Access to Insight, June 7, 2009, Accessed 24 August 2009 Last modified: unknown…

    • 1688 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflict and Omagh Essay

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some people such as Mahatma Gandhi who avoided to respond to conflict with violence and aggressiveness tend to bring about a better future for their people. Gandhi was a man of peace. His values and principles of non-violence, faith and truth are still remembered today. He objected to violence because it appeared to do good, but the good is temporary and the…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Greed In The Great Gatsby

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Published in 1925, The Great Gatsby is a novel that describes the lavish lifestyle of the elite in 1922. During this time of economic prosperity and prohibition, Americans became increasingly commercialized and demanding in regards to their possessions. There are always two sides to each coin, and within this novel there is no exception to that rule. Jay Gatsby and Nick Carraway are the embodiment of separate sides of the same coin.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. King strategically breaks down and characterizes acquiescence as a form of dealing with oppression. Through his analysis, King explains how people surrender to oppression and become accustomed to it as a way of living. Creating an atmosphere where the oppressed person learns to live in with oppression and never fully understands what self respect is. ?Religion reminds everyman that he is his brother?s keeper . . .To accept injustice or segregation passively is to say to the oppressor that his actions are morally right.? (King). Therefore, King believes that this lets the oppressor know that their actions are right influencing the oppressor to continue. Dr. King takes into consideration that this is not the best way to deal with oppression. In fact, he criticizes the people who utilize this method. ?To accept passively and in just system is to cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor.?(King) Violence, as a method of dealing with oppression that Dr. King strongly diverges with. King assumes that people who resort to violence also influence hatred at the same time. He explains how violence only creates temporary results. Although at times it may be seen as the best way out but he believes that no one should ever degrade themselves to that level of understanding and standard. According to King, violence only creates problems instead of…

    • 1864 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of violence in the world is well documented. However it is also possible to use non-violence to bring about change. This DBQ will look at two countries where a non-violent movement was successful. India and South Africa were two important nations on two different continents. But although they looked strong on the outside, each one suffered from a disease that threatened the health of the whole. For India, the disease was colonization. For South Africa, it was racial segregation. In each of these nations three conditions help explain why non-violence worked. The first condition was that both of them had been colonies of England. And like England both countries thought law was very powerful, more powerful even than government officials. The second condition was the presence of violence. Without the possibility of a violent revolution, the government might not have been willing to change. The third condition was the presence of a leader, Mohandas Gandhi in India and Nelson Mandela South Africa. Each of these men was so charismatic he could lead his followers to a non-violent victory. Both of them gave their lives to the cause. Gandhi was shot by an assassin while Mandela spent almost twenty-seven years of his life in prison.…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The practice of violence, like all action, changes the world, but the most probable change is to a more violent world” (Arendt pg 80). Violence is contagious, like a disease, which will destroy nations and our morals as human beings. Each individual has his or her own definition of violence and when it is acceptable or ethical to use it. Martin Luther King Jr., Walter Benjamin, and Hannah Arendt are among the many that wrote about the different facets of violence, in what cases it is ethical, the role we as individuals play in this violent society and the political aspects behind our violence.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Justice Is Not Blind

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Every day people are convicted of crimes they did not commit. It has been a long time since the trials of the Scottsboro Boys or George Whitmore, but our justice system has not changed. People of foreign race and lower social status receive different treatment in the justice system. These victims are often wrongfully accused, or even abused by the ones paid to protect them. The United States justice system gives unfair treatment and trials to our poor and minor races.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people loved Gandhi and prayed for him every day. However, some had a huge grudge against him – hating him and everything he did. Good or bad, Gandhi had his fair share of haters in his lifetime, and still does to this day……

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays