Preview

Analyse the Political Factors Involved in the Unification of Italy Up to 1861

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1293 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyse the Political Factors Involved in the Unification of Italy Up to 1861
Analyse the political factors involved in the unification of Italy up to 1861
Political factors played a huge role in the unification of Italy, both hindering and increasing the possibility of unification up to 1861. In this essay I will evaluate the most important factors that eventually led towards unification such as republicanism, Piedmont and Cavour, and wars such as the Crimean War. I will also discuss the factors that decreased the chances of unification including the congress of Vienna, the role of foreign powers such as Austria, and the role of the Papacy. By the end of this essay I will decide which political factor was the most important in terms of the unification. However, there are other factors heavily involved in the unification, such as the uprisings and revolutions, and the division between the revolutionaries.
The Congress of Vienna in 1815 resulted in the separation of states in Italy and this greatly hindered the progress towards unification. The congress resulted in the restoration of the former rulers of these states including King Ferdinand II to Naples. Ferdinand was an oppressive ruler which led to a poor way of life for the people in this region. The congress also led to the public’s patriotism to their state instead of the whole of Italy. This meant it would be difficult to unite the people, which was needed if the whole of Italy was to be united. The economic and political fragmentation following the Congress added to this problem as there was no political or economic unity. This prevented the unification of Italy in the long term as it was increasingly hard for any revolutions to occur and if they did, they were largely unsuccessful because of the economic and ideological divisions.
The role of foreign powers was also a problem with unification. The key problem was with Austria as their control over Italian states, especially their army in the Papal States, made it hard for the people to overthrow them. However, the power of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Italian unification: Savoy- ruled Piedmont in N Italy = best hope for unification when lead by Count Camillo di Cavour prime minister to Victor Emmanuel II.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 10 Euro Study

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages

    ! How did social class create conflict? • Describe the situation within Florence. • What percentage of Florence’s population was considered paupers? • What was the Ciompi Revolt? What three factors led to it? Who came out on top? ! Despotism and Diplomacy • Who was the wealthiest Florentine? How did he control the city?…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Revolutions broke out in Italy in January making it the first revolt of this historic year. The Italian peninsula was made up of many smaller states and hadn’t yet been unified into one country. Revolutionaries demanded freedom from foreign powers, unification of the peninsula, and the creation of a constitutional government which provided more civil liberties to the people. The leaders of several Italian states such as Sicily, Piedmont, and Tuscany along with Pope Pius IX granted the creation of constitutions for…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1796, a French leader named Napoleon Bonaparte lead his army to attack Italy. Napoleon was an innovator and an opportunist. Although Napoleon had his own reasons for taking over Northern Italy, France mainly wanted Italy for financial and strategic reasons. At this time, Austria owned a portion of Italy, but France wanted to keep this land from them because “it was an ideal outpost for defense and offense” (Sarti 19). Only a few months into Napoleon’s rule, he had changed the political landscape of Italy which had been in place for years. After the Jacobins took power in Genoa in the north and the Roman Republic replaced papal rule in Rome, the Parthenopean Republic replaced the royal court, who escaped to…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In consort with the supporters, there were some anti-unification leaders. The Peace of Villafranca, treaty between France and Austria (1859) stated that conjoining the territories would be easy, but Emperor Napoleon III of France wrote that he did not want Italy to unify because the nation would diminish its preponderance. Though to many it seemed and obvious choice for unification, to these writer including Giuseppe Garibaldi, believed they were a monarchy in the first place for a reason. They thought that separate kingdoms and territories would be beneficial for everyone.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The liberal Italian Government faced many problems in the period between 1896 to 1915; Italy was in a political, economical and social state and was being held back in many ways because of this. Giolitti brought promising progress to Italy but could not solve all of the problems the government faced by 1915.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Austria had a massive empire in the early 19th century, Italy only being a small part. The 1815 Congress of Vienna had given Austria direct control over Lombardy and Venetia, and had also put an Austrian family in charge of ruling smaller duchies such as Parma and Modena. As such, Austria had dominating control over a lot of Italy. However, this was not the only reason why Italian revolutionaries failed. Other factors included the fact that there was no foreign support against Austria and other foreign rulers in Italy and the fact that there was a lack of cooperation between the various revolutionaries.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Congress of Vienna, held after Napoleon's exile to Elba, aimed to sort out problems in Europe. Delegates from Britain, Austria, Prussia and Russia (the winning allies) decided upon a new Europe that left both Germany and Italy as divided states. Strong nationalist elements led to the re-unification of Italy in 1861 and Germany in 1871. The settlement at the end of the Franco-Prussian war left France angry at the loss of Alsace-Lorraine to Germany and keen to regain their lost territory. Large areas of both Austria-Hungary and Serbia were home to differing nationalist groups, all of who wanted freedom from the states in which they lived.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cavour and Realpolitik

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The two men thought Italy should be organized after the war. The valley of the Po, the Romagna, and the Legations would form a kingdom of Upper Italy under the House of Savoy and reunited with France. Rome and its immediate surroundings would be left to the Pope. The rest of the Papal States, together with Tuscany, would form a kingdom of central Italy. The Neapolitan frontier would be left unchanged. These four Italian states would form a confederation and the presidency would be given to the Pope to console him for losing the best part of his estates. This plan conforms to others to obtain sovereignty and control of Italy with allies in states under The…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. Charles V attempted to unify Europe but it was such a difficult task for him that he eventually quit. His attempt at unification was unsuccessful because of reasons including an increase in royal authority and limiting the power of the Church. Countries such as England and France were also beginning to develop politically centralized states and religious unity. Interfering with their states especially if they were growing so fast would be unsuccessful because his attempt to unify them would be ignored.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So in turn this caused problems in the new country. States were in disagreement with one another, state did not financially support the government under the Article of Confederation. Because there was no executive branch congress could not enforce any laws which have passed. Due to not having every state working with each other some states began to form their own military, creating their own money causing no stable economy. (HTT7) After the states noticed economic weakness, they began to ask for stronger Articles that would create a stronger government.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is undeniable that both Camillo de Cavour and Giuseppe Garibaldi both played integral roles in the unification of Italy. These men dedicated their lives to the creation of one cultural and political entity. They also made many great strides towards this unification that very well may have not happened, or at least would not have happened in the same way, if they had not existed. Yet despite this common aim, it is remarkable how much these men differed in their actions and strategies. At times the nature of the actions of these men were so greatly different that they hindered the road to unification. Cavour and Garibaldi, although both dedicated to and aiming for Italian Unification, differed greatly in their methods and actions.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, more importantly in my opinion, the end of the war revealed that Italy lacked the diplomatically-savvy leaders because, as “the ruling coalition included many divergent points of view, her traditional system of government made this almost inevitable”.10 The public was confused about national interests and began to question whether the traditional system was really the best, be it the Liberals, the Socialists or the…

    • 2729 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bismarck and Cavour

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    By 1871, Europe was remapped with the rise of two newly united nations - the Kingdom of Italy and the German Empire. The unification movements of both countries took place at roughly the same time in the mid-19th century and were motivated by the same historical trends - liberalism and nationalism. Before the French Revolution and Napoleon Bonaparte, both Italy and Germany shared some similar features. Italy was divided into a number of separate states which were ruled by despotic kings. Yet the Italians shared a common language and a common history - the Roman Empire. Many still had memories of the ancient unity and glory. Germany was actually more divided than Italy. There were more than three hundred small independent states, and they had no form of common government. Also, the Germans had a common language and shared some memories of unity in medieval times.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics