The writer's diction shows a man who finds the world around him amazing and wishes to understand it in a better fashion. When he describes his first encounters with a snake at his home, he uses several terms of endearment such as "fellow creature" (p. 614) and "Cousin"(abbey, 615). Abbey maintains the act of killing the snake is comparing it to "murder" (abbey, 614) and an affront to morality. The writer describes the birds' song and his compares it to the flute. His word choice reveals a great love for nature and almost a form of worship.
In addition, his word choice reveals a need to rationalize the world around him through science. His use of the scientific name of various creatures such as the diamondback, "Crolatus atrox"(abbey, 614), and the Gopher snake, "Drymarchon corais couperi" (abbey, 615), shows his deep need to objectively understand nature. Abbey states at one quite clear moment in a clear rational manner that he "is not giving human motives to his snake and bird acquaintances" (Abbey, 617). This again shows a man who has his wording designed to be rational and logical.
The imagery the writer provides continues this sense of elevation. He describes the canyon itself as a powerful entity to be in feared and respected. He describes it as having power over humanity. In addition, the "dance" of the snakes in which he lowers himself in order to see the snakes as they raise themselves higher is an extremely poignant example of his powerful imagery. When the snakes