One is that Anselm is specifically communicating to God about God’s existence. Which this part struck me as very ironic because if he is already communicating with God, then why is he still looking for an answer? He should already have his answer and know that God exists. Another thing I found interesting was his example that he uses with the fool who does not believe that there is a God. It is interesting to me in that Anselm simply proves his point because the fool believes him and understands that “A being than which nothing greater can be thought”, it is strange that the fool understands this. Because this exists simply in his understanding, it is weird because it exists in understanding alone and not in
One is that Anselm is specifically communicating to God about God’s existence. Which this part struck me as very ironic because if he is already communicating with God, then why is he still looking for an answer? He should already have his answer and know that God exists. Another thing I found interesting was his example that he uses with the fool who does not believe that there is a God. It is interesting to me in that Anselm simply proves his point because the fool believes him and understands that “A being than which nothing greater can be thought”, it is strange that the fool understands this. Because this exists simply in his understanding, it is weird because it exists in understanding alone and not in