On the occasion in question, defendant, Anheuser-Busch, and their employee Frank Cuellar failed to maintain a safe driving experience with a secure load..…
In the case of Bernard Madoff, an overview was provided that describes the fraud of the century. As a result of the Ponzi scheme, social attitudes toward the investment industry were lukewarm. I will describe the highlights of the case.…
To develop what you believe is a terrific idea for a video game, you lease 50,000 square feet in an office building from Commercial Property, LLC, under a written five-year lease. Your goal is to put the game on the market within two years. Several months into the term, a competitor unexpectedly releases a new game title featuring play that would make your game appear to be a poorly crafted imitation.…
The legal issue presented by Robert Briggs is an action to void an oral real estate contract because it violates the Statute of Frauds. While, the Statute of Frauds does indeed require real estate contracts to be in writing in order to be enforceable, the Statute of Frauds does not apply to Briggs v. Sackett as the specifics of this case warrant an exception from the Statue of Frauds under the equitable doctrine of part performance.…
We are confident that our client will prevail in going to a trial on the merits; whereby, in view of all applicable elements, and based upon the following rationale, the court will more than likely rule against your client finding the liability in both his actions and his inaction, to be compensable. It is reasonable to presume what irreversible damage to your client’s reputation will likely occur with a jury verdict of guilt, inevitably causing loss of revenues.…
Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, & Sethi, M. L. (2009, May 28). United States: Criminal liability…
They also made the conscious decision to not advice of the increase of robberies in the area. Mr. Helton asked the motel clerk prior to leaving his trailer in the parking lot if it was ok for him to leave it there. The motel clerk responded that it should be fine. The morning after, the plaintiffs discovered that their trailer had been stolen. Trying to inquire about prior theft to the same parking lot the motel’s clerk responded that there had not been any theft prior to the plaintiffs stay.…
Xander Barden and Katelyn Lippa are the defendant’s (O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs) representatives they are recommending the Court present an outline verdict to the bartender, John Daniels and O’Malley’s Tavern. There is definite understanding and helpful information defined in the Indiana Dream Shop Act which contains useful knowledge. Mr. Edward Hard did not participate or take on any behavior or actions that provided proof of intoxication. Debora White, the Plaintiff is in search of compensation from the defendants, O’Malley’s Tavern and Patrick Gibbs with the theory that Mr. Patrick Gibbs had concrete awareness of Mr. Edward Hard’s consumption of alcohol. (I.C. 7.1-5-10-15.5, 1996) cites that Mr. Gibbs the defendant have actual knowledge of the person being intoxicated before damages are allowed to be awarded. Practical awareness does not persuade the hindrance nor does individual awareness. Indirect evidence doesn’t support practical awareness only actual knowledge. Individual awareness can sustain the intrusion whereas actual knowledge has to carry through and support the intrusion. Observable dealings with the recognizable events of intoxication are prejudiced according to the 7th Indiana State Circuit Court. In the Supreme Court statue stated prior to the year 1988 common law tolerated practical awareness for intrusions and caused a change in the law for this not to be supported.…
This case between the plaintiff, Deborah White (Appellee) and the defendants, Patrick Gibbs; and Stand Alone Properties, L.L.C., d/b/a O’Malley’s Tavern (Appenllants) was the subject of a Summary Judgment Motion filed on behalf of the Appellants in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Hammond Division.…
The Residential Property Disclosure Act in Tennessee Code Annotated §66-5-201-210 requires most sellers of residential real estate to complete a disclosure form. The disclosure let the buyer know about the condition of the property. Failure to disclose information can result in the canceling of a contract and be the basis for legal action. Sellers must report any known defects or malfunctions of structural or mechanical components.…
The SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4, and the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, and the SW 1/4 of Section 22 contains:…
D. the facts of the case (5 points); There were no warning signs on tobacco products, Ohio supplier was liable for warn when he should have known the dangers of the product, and defendants were charged with breach of negligence for not displaying…
Liberty University presented a case of White v. Gibbs which is about Mrs. Debbie White and Patrick Gibbs under the civil provisions of Indiana’s Dram Shop Act, Indiana Code 7.1-5-10-15.5. In this case Mrs. Debbie White sued Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Because White and Gibbs do not live in the same states, the suit was brought in diversity in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana. However, the suit will be decided under Indiana state law. The main goal of this courtroom is to argue the motion for summary judgment which is concerning the case of Mrs. Debbie White, Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. In this case, the plaintiff is Debbie White. Two moot court attorneys who are Amanda Babbitt and Jack Walsh represent Mrs. White. The defendants are Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. Also two other moot court attorneys who are Benjamin Walton and Jordan Van Meter represent the defendants which are Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern.…
Introduction Prohibition began with the ratification of the 18th American Constitutional Amendment on January 16th, 1919 prohibiting the manufacture, sale, or transportation of alcoholic beverages for consumption.[footnoteRef:1] Prohibition was the end product of opposing views of social activism, and political reform known as the Progressive Era in America from 1890 to 1920 and was the first legislative attempt of the federal government to regulate consumption of a legal product in the United States.[footnoteRef:2] It was an era dominated by the attempts of several social, financial and political factions to reform ? American life?.[footnoteRef:3] The historiography of prohibition is abundant and has gradually developed into four divisions…
Pat was very frustrated because she wanted to purchase a home but lacked the funds or credit to do so even though Pat was expecting shortly to receive a one-half million dollar final installment payment for some land she sold several years earlier. Dan knew that Pat was very interested in purchasing a home and approached Pat with a proposal to assist Pat in buying a home. Dan told Pat that he would help Pat with the financing. After finding the home she wanted to buy for $250,000, Dan and Pat orally agreed that Dan would purchase the home and "when you come up with the money, I (Dan) will sell it to you (Pat) for $250,000 plus a fair commission to be determined."…