However, both works give a “thorough assessment of a significant poet” (Holdridge 4) and both writers illustrate the “complexities” (Holdridge 1) readers confront in his poetry. Kendall believes that Muldoon’s poetry reveals certain difficulties though his poetic technique manipulates readers and reassures them that all is well, which provokes bewilderment in them. Muldoon exclaims, “part of writing is about manipulation – leaving [readers] high and dry, in some corner of a terrible party, where I’ve nipped out through the bathroom window” (Wills, Jenkins and Lanchester 19-20). Muldoon’s poetry is thus double-edged as it always deceives readers by its apparent “sense of smoothness and readability, only to proceed to discomfort, provoke, confuse, and fascinate” (Broom 205). It “often seems intentionally obscure” and its highly accomplished style is often “bewildering” (Holdridge …show more content…
Poets seek to be regarded as no less important than any of these since the “public health of the nation would suffer if poets didn’t resist the insidious impulse of others to use language to their own ends.” Poets should have a responsibility towards language: making it clear not obscure and getting rid of the “garbage” wherever it may be “in the advertising slogan, the newspaper article, the politician’s speech, the preacher’s sermon”