“Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants” is a piece written by Marc Prensky showcasing the difference in the generation who grew up with rising technology and the generation who teach the younger generation. Presnky presents his piece and illustrates today’s students struggle in education dealing with an older generation who did not grow up with technology. This article highlights the reason the educational system is not effective in teaching to the style of the “Digitial Natives”.…
In Nicholas Carr’s book, “The Shallows: What The Internet is Doing to our Brains,” he makes the powerful point that in order to assume technology’s power, especially intellectual technology, we must pay a particularly high price. Carr states this idea in one quote from his book, “The price we pay to assume technologies power is alienation. The toll can be particularly high with our intellectual technologies. the tools of the mind amplify and in turn numb the most intimate, the most human, of our natural capacities- those for reason perception, memory, emotion(pg 211).” This price for intellectual technologies can range from a lowered ability to pull up memorized information, a shorter attention span, having a harder time learning new information, or even a changed perception of our world. All of these points help show how the internet is affecting our brains physically and mentally.…
Professor Sherry Turkle chronicles the impact of being overly attached to technology in her essay “Growing Up Tethered”. In this essay Turkle interviews may high schoolers on how much technology and being tethered to their phones affects their daily lives. Turkle states that the overabundance of technology and the constant need to be entertained as well as be connected is harming the development of adolescent’s independence. Turkle also observes that being bound to social media causes extreme amount of stress on adolescents as they try to fit in while sculpting their digital identity’s. Turkle brings many of these unfortunate byproducts to light, but she only looks at a subset of high schooler that use this technology the most profoundly in…
With “Digital Demands: The Challenges of Constant Connectivity” the person they interviewed was Sherry Turkle. In the book it talks about Turkle being a scholar and the director of MIT’s Initiative on Technology and Self. Turkle has also written a book called Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other which shows she has done quite the bit of research on the topic. I also established Ethos through “An Internet ‘Eraser’ Laws Would Hurt, Not Help, Oregon Teens”. Susan Nielson is the lead editorial writer on law and education. She was also an associate editor and columnist for the Portland Oregonian newspaper…
As we remember the women who entered the workforce during WWI. Many things had changed after the war which led to many controversies and fighting for social equality with men. Some of these events are called: The first female Member of Parliament, The Persons Case and of course the Famous Five.…
Mark Bauerlain says that “technological advantages don’t show up in intellectual outcomes” and “the mental equipment of the young falls short of their media, money, e-gadgets, and career plans.” But the truth of the matter is that examination scores have been on the rise since the early 1900’s as written by Sharon Begley in her article, creating a direct correlation with the rise of technology. Bauerlain also says “The 18-year-old may have a Visa-card, cell phone, Myspace page, part time job, Play Station 2, and an admissions letter from the State U., but if you ask this wired and on-the-go high school senior a few intellectual questions and the façade of in-the-know-ness crumbles,” (Source 2) This statement can be countered with another statement from Sharon Begley: “But there is no empirical evidence that being immersed in instant messaging, texting, iPods, videogames and all things online impairs thinking…
When asked asked what the benefits and drawbacks of new technologies were Gardner responded, “...the Internet has certainly contributed to the broadening of acceptable identities in today’s young people,” Gardner continues stating examples, such as being a geek or openly gay, that are now considered to be socially acceptable. Gardner explains that with the use of new technologies teens are encountering more diversity; cultural, religious, and general diversity “reinforce the acceptance of difference.” What Gardner did not include was that while it opened up acceptance horizons, it also opened shunning horizons, more so bullying horizons, because with the acceptance individuals became more open about themselves, and so did the people who did not agree with them. Everyday someone is shunned for being who they are, with advancements in social networking somebody in the United Kingdom could tell another in the United States that they are an abomination, what they’re doing or how they’re living their life is wrong, being themself is wrong. So, has technology really opened acceptance, or has it given a false hope, a facade, of acceptance to cover up the new form of intolerance; the only difference now is you’re being judged by somebody who doesn’t know you, a face you’ll never see, a voice you’ll never hear, a text box you’ll never forget.…
When it comes to the topic of online learning, most of us will readily agree that technology can be an incredible learning tool in this new Digital Age. Where this usually ends, however, is on the question of whether or not technology is helping or hindering the learning of students and young adults. Whereas some are convinced that technology will help students by supplying them with knowledge and vast amounts of resources, others maintain that technology is corrupting our youth and making us stupid. One such person who believes the latter is Mark Bauerlein.…
"What's The Matter With Kids Today?" An article by Amy Goldwasser, argues against the old generations who assume that the internet and technology are worthless. The negative views on teens today are viewing teens to be ignorant and blind of the world around us. Goldwasser starts off her article by taking quotes and multiple studies on the problem of teens and technology. Goldwasser makes logical arguments of the benefits of technology in the lives of teens today. She also talks about how the older generations don't like the use of technology by kids.…
Smith begins by establishing the connection today’s students have to the internet and its resources. “Pencils and paper,” he says, are being moved out of the way for “keyboards, webcams, and online drop boxes (Smith 3).” Smith attacks his argument using examples that seem to come from his experience with MyRED and EBSCO search engine, he claims that now more than ever students are completely dependent upon online resources (6). He goes on to mention the convenience of such online supplements, such as being able to register at any time online with MyRED, the ability to check grades or assignments from anywhere on Blackboard, or being able to access a greater wealth of information through search engines like EBSCO(6). As soon as Smith has established the reliance on technology that students have today, he shifts gears. Smith before he goes anywhere with his information, his approach to explaining the amount of weight put on students through the internet shifts to explaining how today’s students are irresponsible and can’t handle the freedom of online…
According to Lauren Shinozuka, in her essay, “The Dangers of Digital Distractedness,” we are a digital generation. She asserts we are celebrated for our aptitude in effortless interactions with society through technology. However, the author questions the effect that this mass use of digital media has on societal and personal interactions and suggests we are alienating ourselves from those around us. She offers the point that we have developed an obsession with high-tech communication and are afflicted by fruitlessly attempting to do too many things at once, as well as automating our interpersonal interactions, disconnecting from genuine contact, and promoting a falsified version of…
In the Frontline video titled Digital Nation, Rachel Dretzin and Douglas Rushkoff explored the impact of digital media on today’s society. In the video they cover everything from it’s impact on the brain, to it’s impact on students, to it’s impact on the military. Nothing is spared in this investigation on the effect of digital media, and growing up in a wired world. However the main thing I managed to take away from this film was it has had a dramatic effect on human abilities and communication, which I will be discussing in the following paragraphs.…
Secondly, people should moderately use technology because an over-use of technology, such as in the use of social media sites, causes a vulnerability in real-life social skills. In “What’s the Matter with Kids Today?,” Amy Goldwasser incorrectly points out that children should use their form of reading and writing in their social lives and apply it to education. Goldwasser refutes against the claims of the older generation in that the Internet has negative consequences on children and instead, argues that the Internet beneficially impacts children because it is a form of communication that is composed of a generation of writers, activists, and storytellers. She believes that the internet has encouraged teenagers to “read and write for fun;…
However, doubts inevitably arise on the negative effects of the same technology. In his book titled The Dumbest Generation, Mark Bauerlein claims, “those under age thirty constitute the ‘dumbest’ generation in modern history.” He says that students are no less intelligent or ambitious, but that their reading habits and general knowledge are diminishing (167). He blames the digital age and its distractions…
“Isolated by the Internet” an essay written by Clifford Stoll pinpoints exactly what researchers believe the internet is doing too much of today’s society. Stoll explains in detail that Internet is breaking apart family values, slowing personal interaction, distancing reality, and robbing personal time. Clifford Stoll has provided evidence that the internet is breaking apart many families and distancing them from one another. For example, Stoll expresses that many parents bring their work home, and spend only six to eight minutes a day talking with their children (106). Furthermore, Stoll states that productivity in the home takes away from playtime that even in our alone time work seeps into even the most intimate of moments (107,108). Although internet is a fast, aid in society it can also slow basic personal interaction “These electronic intermediaries dull our abilities to read each other’s gestures ad facial expressions, to express our feelings, to strike up conversations with strangers, to craft stories, to tell jokes” (106). Clifford Stoll states that it causes a person not to learn basic skills such as how to interrupt, how to speak in front of a large audience, or worst when to talk or be silent. (107) He brings in psychologists and scientist points of view that contradict significantly with those of major computing companies. For example Stoll references to psychology professor Philip Zimbardo who states that technological advances cause shyness which is a basic lack of communication skill, where as Intel stated “This is not about the Technology, per se; it’s about how it is used (105,106). Stoll uses Zimbardo’s personal account to explain computer isolation, Zimbardo will occasionally walk down the hallway and say hello and to some this is shocking and feels it is invading their space (110). The inability to communicate is in part due to the isolation of internet. Clifford Stoll insinuates that…