First is the “Wise men”, these men knew death was coming, but their inspiration did not live on, in turns they died peacefully and that as the end. Wejer explains “Free from the suffering-doubting the true meaning of his subjectively meaningful action.” (Para, 17). The second man described in the poem is the “Good men” who “rage against the dying of the light.” (Para, 3). These men lived a good life but also did not live it in a way to be meaningful after death. Weijer implies “Having infinite consequences’ for life is objectively meaningful because it leaves a permanent mark on the universe that will always be significant.” (Para, 25). The good men will be known throughout their presence, but after death they will be forgotten.” Next the “Wild men” is described, “Men who learn to late.”(Thomas, Para, 4). These men have lived their life the way they wanted, and now it is too late to make their life meaningful after death. They should have been wise and focused on how to “meaningfully connect their infinite lives with their infinite life.” (Weijer, Para, 3). Then the next type of men that is described is the “grave men” with “blind eyes.” (Thomas, Para, 5). These men did not see their death coming therefore they “do not go gentle in the good night.” (Thomas, Tittle). Their “important meaning-conferring desires where left unsatisfied.” (Weiner, Para, 4). The last men described in the poem include a personal connection to the author. The father of the author was sick and was close to the end of his life. “Sad height” (Thomas, Para, 6). Thomas wanted his father’s life to mean something, “I pray, do not go gentle into that good night.” (Para, 6). To have a meaningful life, it needs to have a “Third person view-point, or the universe eye view.” (Weijer, Para,
First is the “Wise men”, these men knew death was coming, but their inspiration did not live on, in turns they died peacefully and that as the end. Wejer explains “Free from the suffering-doubting the true meaning of his subjectively meaningful action.” (Para, 17). The second man described in the poem is the “Good men” who “rage against the dying of the light.” (Para, 3). These men lived a good life but also did not live it in a way to be meaningful after death. Weijer implies “Having infinite consequences’ for life is objectively meaningful because it leaves a permanent mark on the universe that will always be significant.” (Para, 25). The good men will be known throughout their presence, but after death they will be forgotten.” Next the “Wild men” is described, “Men who learn to late.”(Thomas, Para, 4). These men have lived their life the way they wanted, and now it is too late to make their life meaningful after death. They should have been wise and focused on how to “meaningfully connect their infinite lives with their infinite life.” (Weijer, Para, 3). Then the next type of men that is described is the “grave men” with “blind eyes.” (Thomas, Para, 5). These men did not see their death coming therefore they “do not go gentle in the good night.” (Thomas, Tittle). Their “important meaning-conferring desires where left unsatisfied.” (Weiner, Para, 4). The last men described in the poem include a personal connection to the author. The father of the author was sick and was close to the end of his life. “Sad height” (Thomas, Para, 6). Thomas wanted his father’s life to mean something, “I pray, do not go gentle into that good night.” (Para, 6). To have a meaningful life, it needs to have a “Third person view-point, or the universe eye view.” (Weijer, Para,