Firstly, they all maintained a relaxed composure. As we not only listened to but watched the speakers, they all appeared prepared yet natural. They all exhibited controlled eye contact. The three all stood relaxed and clearly performed their speeches without any distracting actions. However, John did give some gestures, but they did help listeners to differentiate between the sides of his topic. They presented themselves well without being distracting during their speeches. …show more content…
Secondly, these speeches contained not only sufficient but extensive knowledge pertaining to their topics.
They had credible facts from reliable sources, and integrated their quotes perfectly throughout their speech. Most importantly, Jeremy easily listed the housing prices as “3.1 million” in West Vancouver and “1.19 million” in Eastern Vancouver” and John compared the costs of driving a gasoline-run car to an electric car. These statistics were also clearly explained to listeners, who may not necessarily be experts in the topics, to understand. Furthermore, Jeremy related his facts of the housing prices to his audience, who are direct witnesses to this issue.
T
Finally, the speakers projected their voice. They opened with a welcoming and loud tone that reached to all the students in the classroom. Jeremy and John spoke in a varied, natural tone that was steady yet exciting to follow. They pacced themselves between their core ideas for the audience to emphasize them. They also spoke in a stern tone during their main arguments. Notably, Gabriella strongly expressed her dissatisfaction of how the niqab contradicts feminism. Through this, I could tell how strongly she believed in her opinions, making myself want to believe in her as well. They expressed their speeches using a variety of tones that matched natural speech patterns.
Altogether, the speeches of Jeremy Wong, John Thomas, and Gabriella Hermary maintained a prominent stature and delivered their speeches in a dynamic voice for the audience to consider and retain their credible and well-integrated facts and arguments.