Preview

Analysis of Julius Caesar Act IV

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
335 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis of Julius Caesar Act IV
Act IV Reading Questions pg. 1169
The three men that take over Rome when Caesar is murdered are Octavian, Marcus Antonius, and Marcus Lepidus.
The friendship between Brutus and Cassius changed because, Brutus realized that the reasons for killing Caesar weren’t the same for either of them. Brutus wanted to kill Caesar because he wanted to save the people but Cassius was just jealous of Caesar, “Be angry when you will; it shall have scope” (1162).
Portia commits suicide by swallowing hot coals because she thinks that all is lost for her and her husband.
Brutus believes that the men should march to Philippi to meet Antony and OCtavius’ army, but Cassius believes that it would be better for the enemy to come to them.
Brutus’s tragic flaw is that he is altogether too trusting. He genuinely thought that the other men were killing Caesar for the good of the people but now is seeing that they were lying, “Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?” (1158)
Antony’s words in Act four scene one made me look at him a lot differently than I did earlier in the play. Antony is plotting on what is the quickest way to get money from Caesar’s will, “Fetch the will hither, and we shall determine how to cut off some charge in legacies” (1154).
Brutus wants to appear completely determined in his interactions with the conspirators, his inability to confess his thoughts to Portia signifies that he still had traces of doubt about the plan.
At Philippi, Cassius and Brutus ride up and meet Octavian and Antony for parley but insults come of it. Cassius later tells Messala he has seen ill omens.
The romans seem much worse off because the conspirators are clashing in opinions and their original plan has seemed to fall apart. Caesar was organized and much more prepared to rule Rome. Brutus’s complaint is justified because he is saying that Cassius’s goals have become selfish and corrupt which is very much

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Octavian was pushed by Brutus back to the legion's camp. To the south part of Philippi, Cassius was defeated by Antony. Because of that false rumor that Brutus had spread , he had committed suicide. Brutus had gathered Cassius' still standing troops and both sides had their army to retreat to their camps. The battle was a draw.…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    12. What reasons does Portia give to insist that Brutus reveal his feelings to her?…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. Brutus – the army must march immediately so that the people don’t join Antony’s army…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act 5 begins with Octavius and Antony saying that their hopes have come true because the men are fleeing the hills and coming to them. This says that Brutus is not truly in his right mind for strategy and is blinded by wanting be honorable after killing Caesar. Cassius then tells Brutus “Flatterers! Now, Brutus, thank yourself;/This tongue had not offended so today/If Cassius might have ruled.” (see lines 45-47), meaning that if had acted as Cassius suggested, then they would not be headed towards battle and may have lived. Also, Cassius reveals that he has seen ravens, crows, and kites flying over them, like vultures waiting for meat after the prey has been killed. After Cassius confession, Brutus says that should they lose the battle, he…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Was Julius Caesar Bad

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As far as military strategy goes Cassius had the better brain for it. Brutus was not a very good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good idea to kill Antony. He thought that Antony would talk the people into trying to kill Brutus and…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Act I Q A

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Antony tells Caesar that Cassius is a noble Roman and that he is well disposed toward Caesar.…

    • 1360 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cassius is able to assess his audience and use that to his advantage. In this case, his audience is Brutus, a thoughtful if slightly oblivious patrician and friend of Caesar’s. Brutus has a strong love for Rome,…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    did not want him in the conspiracy is that he did not want competition for the…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare positions the audience to view the assassination in negative aspect, through Antony’s passionate eulogy, as compared to Brutus’ austere speech. This is understandable, as given Shakespeare’s Elizabethan context, where the removal of a legitimate leader would be viewed as treason.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his second monologue, Cassius focuses on pathos and logos in order to appeal to his audience, Brutus, directly. Cassius smartly avoids further development of ethos in this monologue to make sure Brutus doesn’t think this is all personal for Cassius and deter him from the conspiracy. Therefore, as mentioned before, Cassius’ intent for his second monologue is to appeal to Brutus. He wants to raise Brutus to the same level as Caesar and make him see that he is just as important in I.ii.9-15. This makes Brutus feel good about himself, and successfully makes Cassius’ arguments against Caesar more personal to Brutus and slowly pulls him into the conspiracy. Cassius could’ve used anyone’s name in his explanation that the name is equal to Caesar, but the fact that he used Brutus’ name made his pathos much stronger and directed at the audience for greater persuasion. This is where Cassius strongly considers his audience and knows that by implementing them into the argument he will have a higher chance at success. When Cassius then shifts into appeal to logos, he explains that Caesar, one man, is taking up all the fame and glory of Rome when there is room for much more than just one single, not even god-like man (I.ii.18-25). He explains once again just like he did in the concluding sentence of his first paragraph that it does not make sense that one man receive all the power and “bear the palm alone” (I.ii.43) He dives into the values of his audience and the people of that time who valued democracy, equality and even a divvied up triumvirate of three leaders who ruled Rome simultaneously in a checks and balances sort of way to avoid absolute leadership like the one Caesar is holding. Brutus of course would agree that, yes, why should a single man rule when the people or Rome and its government is based on a triumvirate with democratic…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius once suggested “Everything we hear is an opinion, not a fact. Everything we see is a perspective, not the truth”; embodying the notion that conflicting perspectives are held by different people towards both events and individuals. I believe that this common idea is held true in William Shakespeare’s production ‘Julius Caesar’, discussing the conflict between Brutus, Cassius and Antony, Richard Glover’s Sydney Morning Herald article ‘Take a Moment to Mourn the Mainstream’, debating against the depreciation of the respect over radio stations between generations, and Frank Capra’s classic film ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington’, which expresses the triumph of American ideals through the conflicting morals of Senator Jefferson Smith and Joseph Paine. In each we see how the respective composers have used main protagonists as well as various literary and cinematic devices to express the theme of conflicting perspectives and influence the audience’s reception.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Brutus was a devious man, even though what he thought he was doing was right. Brutus told his fellow conspirators to kill Caesar "boldly, but not angerly."(3.1.256-257) Brutus was one of Caesars right hand men, and yet Brutus kills his own friend. When Antony asks to speak at Caesars funeral, Cassius says no, but Brutus tell him that Antony will speak, but only what Brutus tells him to say. Brutus also embraces the fact that he just killed his friend, and also tells the senators who had just witnessed it to not be afraid, but to stay because ambition has paid its debt.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10th Grade Julius Caesar

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    lost due to Brutus choosing the worse path. Conflicts with Cassius occur before the war, arguing…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acute Care Model

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To my understanding, America’s healthcare system is based upon a chronic level of care and an acute level of care. In some instances, it is possible to transition from these levels of care as well. Depending on what type of medical care that one needs will determine whether it will be acute or chronic. Acute care may encompass treatment of illnesses and disorders in a moderately short amount of time. Patients receiving acute care may seek treatment for short-term illnesses or injuries and possible rehabilitation after an injury. Some examples of acute care may include; sprained ankle, common cold, or even a UTI.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays