Analysis Of 'Nonimportation' By Professor Holton

Although non- elites contribute to the elite’s decision to fight for freedom, Professor Holton’s emphasizes that Thomas Jefferson and fellow Virginian leaders were unwilling to passively stand by or bullied. In fact, the author quotes excerpts from the Declaration of Independence and other documents such as correspondences and books to magnify their offensive and defensive posture towards the opposing government. Readers are informed about the two-pronged strategy to reduce their debts and challenging pieces of legislation keeping them financially imprisoned," the effort had two distinct parts, “nonimportation” and “nonexportation” "(75). Details concerning the boycott of British manufactured items sheds light on the social and psychological ramifications
The author continues developing a supportive narrative for his thesis claiming that farmers’ played a role in deciding to declare independence. As He continues to unfold the drama of farmers ‘refusal to export tobacco and refusal to sell to Chesapeake buyers as a means to raise prices for tobacco in order to reconcile debt payments. Evidence provided by the author argues that farmers decided to work with the elites, their," gentry’s association…became one of the vehicles that carried the thirteen colonies into the American Revolution"(129). Although some evidence of the merchants’ role is mentioned, such as their refusal to discontinue retailing imported goods and conveniences more information is needed to fully assist audiences with understanding the connection to influencing the war. Meanwhile, Professor Holton’s, solid presentation of Governor Dunmore’s makeshift emancipation offer for slaves in exchange for service in his army provides clarity about the slaves’ involvement in contributing to an already chaotic environment. Also, sources provide information about the attitudes toward blacks and the severity of punishment they endured for escaping which acts as a backdrop for the slavery uprising